IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dem/wpaper/wp-2025-021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Human capital investment helps mitigate family caregiving challenges in aging China

Author

Listed:
  • Sha Jiang

    (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany)

  • Haili Liang
  • Diego Alburez-Gutierrez

    (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany)

  • Emilio Zagheni

    (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany)

Abstract

Objective: Population aging and shrinking family structures in China are placing unprecedented strain on traditional family-based systems of old-age support. This study develops and applies a capital-based caregiving framework that integrates human capital with the structural dimension of social capital (i.e., kinship networks) to assess the caregiving dynamics within families. We provide the first long-term projection of family caregiving dynamics in China, modeling how rising education--by improving health--can simultaneously enhance caregiving capacity and moderate care needs amid declining kin availability. Methods: We used formal demographic kinship models to project the number and age composition of a broad range of kin for older adults in China from 1950 to 2100, capturing kinship structure as the structural dimension of social capital. Educational attainment and education-specific health gradients were then integrated to model the human capital of each kin member. These dimensions were synthesized into novel health-adjusted kin-dependency ratios to assess caregiving dynamics over time. Results: We find that while the number of working-age kin declines substantially across cohorts, rising education and health among both working-age and older kin enhance caregiving capacity and reduce care needs. Under a rapid educational expansion scenario, the health-adjusted kin-dependency ratio is projected to be approximately 10% lower by 2100 compared to a stalled education scenario, indicating a substantial buffering effect of human capital on aggregate caregiving burdens. Conclusions: Human capital investment, particularly in education, serve as a powerful, though partial, demographic buffer against the family caregiving challenges posed by population aging and shrinking family size. These findings demonstrate that overlooking the human capital composition of kin leads to overly pessimistic assessments of family caregiving capacity. The capital-based framework developed here offers a new perspective for integrating demographic and resource-based approaches to family support, with implications for aging societies beyond China.

Suggested Citation

  • Sha Jiang & Haili Liang & Diego Alburez-Gutierrez & Emilio Zagheni, 2025. "Human capital investment helps mitigate family caregiving challenges in aging China," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2025-021, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:wpaper:wp-2025-021
    DOI: 10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2025-021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/papers/working/wp-2025-021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2025-021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hal Caswell & Xi Song, 2021. "The formal demography of kinship III: Kinship dynamics with time-varying demographic rates," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(16), pages 517-546.
    2. Huang, Bin & Tani, Massimiliano & Wei, Yi & Zhu, Yu, 2022. "Returns to education in China: Evidence from the great higher education expansion," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Elke Loichinger, 2015. "Labor force projections up to 2053 for 26 EU countries, by age, sex, and highest level of educational attainment," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(15), pages 443-486.
    4. Hal Caswell, 2022. "The formal demography of kinship IV: Two-sex models and their approximations," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(13), pages 359-396.
    5. Eileen Crimmins & Jung Kim & Sarinnapha Vasunilashorn, 2010. "Biodemography: New approaches to understanding trendsand differences in population health and mortality," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 47(1), pages 41-64, March.
    6. Stéphane Cullati & Matthias Kliegel & Eric Widmer, 2018. "Development of reserves over the life course and onset of vulnerability in later life," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(8), pages 551-558, August.
    7. Zhangjun Zhou & Ashton M Verdery & Rachel Margolis & Feinian Chen, 2019. "No Spouse, No Son, No Daughter, No Kin in Contemporary China: Prevalence, Correlates, and Differences in Economic Support," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(8), pages 1453-1462.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Butterick, Joe W.B. & Smith, Peter W.F. & Bijak, Jakub & Hilton, Jason, 2025. "A mathematical framework for time-variant multi-state kinship modelling," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Hal Caswell & Rachel Margolis & Ashton Verdery, 2023. "The formal demography of kinship V: Kin loss, bereavement, and causes of death," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 49(41), pages 1163-1200.
    3. Liliana P. Calderón-Bernal & Diego Alburez-Gutierrez & Martin Kolk & Emilio Zagheni, 2025. "Assessing the validity of microsimulated kinship networks using Swedish population registers," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2025-020, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    4. Hal Caswell, 2024. "The formal demography of kinship VI: Demographic stochasticity and variance in the kinship network," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 51(39), pages 1201-1256.
    5. Lanza Queiroz, Bernardo & Lobo Alves Ferreira, Matheus, 2021. "The evolution of labor force participation and the expected length of retirement in Brazil," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    6. Chen, Yuanyuan & Wang, Haining & Cheng, Zhiming & Smyth, Russell, 2023. "Education and Migrant Health in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    7. Samuel Vézina & Alain Bélanger, 2019. "Impacts of education and immigration on the size and skills of the future workforce," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(12), pages 331-366.
    8. Rocha de Jesus Fernandes, Anderson & Lanza Queiroz, Bernardo, 2024. "Aging, education and some other implications for the silver dividend in developing countries: Evidence from Brazil," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    9. Noreen Goldman & Dana A Glei & Maxine Weinstein, 2016. "What Matters Most for Predicting Survival? A Multinational Population-Based Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, July.
    10. Kelin, Ema & Istenič, Tanja & Sambt, Jože, 2023. "The role of educational attainment in production and transfers in the form of unpaid household work," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    11. Meiwen, Su & Ming, Ji & Mengyu, Li, 2025. "Education, technology and high-quality economic development," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Elke Loichinger & C. Katharina Spiess, 2023. "The key role of early education in an ageing and shrinking population: The example of Germany," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 21(1), pages 93-103.
    13. Todd, Megan A. & Shkolnikov, Vladimir M. & Goldman, Noreen, 2016. "Why are well-educated Muscovites more likely to survive? Understanding the biological pathways," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 138-147.
    14. Sommet, Nicolas & Spini, Dario, 2022. "Financial scarcity undermines health across the globe and the life course," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    15. Guillaume Drevon & Philippe Gerber & Vincent Kaufmann, 2020. "Dealing with Daily Rhythms: Families’ Strategies to Tackle Chronic Time Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Michaud, Pierre-Carl & Crimmins, Eileen M. & Hurd, Michael D., 2016. "The effect of job loss on health: Evidence from biomarkers," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 194-203.
    17. Sayuri Inuzuka & Paulo Cesar Veiga Jardim & Shafika Abrahams-Gessel & Ludimila Garcia Souza & Ana Carolina Rezende & Naiana Borges Perillo & Samanta Garcia Souza & Ymara Cássia Luciana Araújo & Rogéri, 2018. "Self-rated health status and illiteracy as death predictors in a Brazilian cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, July.
    18. Guillaume MAROIS & Patrick SABOURIN & Alain BÉLANGER, 2019. "Forecasting Human Capital of EU Member Countries Accounting for Sociocultural Determinants," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(3), pages 231-269, September.
    19. Chang Xu & Futao Xiang & Ruiqi Duan & Cristina Miralles-Cardona & Xinxin Huo & Junwei Xu, 2023. "An Analysis of Factors Influencing Chinese University Students’ Major Choice from the Perspective of Gender Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-13, September.
    20. Guillaume Marois & Ekaterina Zhelenkova & Balhasan Ali, 2022. "Labour Force Projections in India Until 2060 and Implications for the Demographic Dividend," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 477-497, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:wpaper:wp-2025-021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Wilhelm (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.