IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dar/wpaper/113226.html

Predicting Pulmonary Function Testing from Quantified Computed Tomography Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Patients with COPD

Author

Listed:
  • Gawlitza, Joshua
  • Sturm, Timo
  • Spohrer, Kai
  • Henzler, Thomas
  • Akin, Ibrahim
  • Schönberg, Stefan
  • Borggrefe, Martin
  • Haubenreisser, Holger
  • Trinkmann, Frederik

Abstract

Introduction: Quantitative computed tomography (qCT) is an emergent technique for diagnostics and research in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). qCT parameters demonstrate a correlation with pulmonary function tests and symptoms. However, qCT only provides anatomical, not functional, information. We evaluated five distinct, partial-machine learning-based mathematical models to predict lung function parameters from qCT values in comparison with pulmonary function tests. Methods: 75 patients with diagnosed COPD underwent body plethysmography and a dose-optimized qCT examination on a third-generation, dual-source CT with inspiration and expiration. Delta values (inspiration—expiration) were calculated afterwards. Four parameters were quantified: mean lung density, lung volume low-attenuated volume, and full width at half maximum. Five models were evaluated for best prediction: average prediction, median prediction, k-nearest neighbours (kNN), gradient boosting, and multilayer perceptron. Results: The lowest mean relative error (MRE) was calculated for the kNN model with 16%. Similar low MREs were found for polynomial regression as well as gradient boosting-based prediction. Other models led to higher MREs and thereby worse predictive performance. Beyond the sole MRE, distinct differences in prediction performance, dependent on the initial dataset (expiration, inspiration, delta), were found. Conclusion: Different, partially machine learning-based models allow the prediction of lung function values from static qCT parameters within a reasonable margin of error. Therefore, qCT parameters may contain more information than we currently utilize and can potentially augment standard functional lung testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Gawlitza, Joshua & Sturm, Timo & Spohrer, Kai & Henzler, Thomas & Akin, Ibrahim & Schönberg, Stefan & Borggrefe, Martin & Haubenreisser, Holger & Trinkmann, Frederik, 2019. "Predicting Pulmonary Function Testing from Quantified Computed Tomography Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Patients with COPD," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 113226, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
  • Handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:113226
    Note: for complete metadata visit http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/113226/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/9/1/33
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyndman, Rob J. & Koehler, Anne B., 2006. "Another look at measures of forecast accuracy," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 679-688.
    2. Li Shao & Xiaohui Fan & Ningtao Cheng & Leihong Wu & Yiyu Cheng, 2013. "Determination of Minimum Training Sample Size for Microarray-Based Cancer Outcome Prediction–An Empirical Assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-9, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ekaterina Jussupow & Kai Spohrer & Armin Heinzl & Joshua Gawlitza, 2021. "Augmenting Medical Diagnosis Decisions? An Investigation into Physicians’ Decision-Making Process with Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 713-735, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:prg:jnlcfu:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:id:572 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Laurence T Kell & Iago Mosqueira & Henning Winker & Rishi Sharma & Toshihide Kitakado & Massimiliano Cardinale, 2024. "Empirical validation of integrated stock assessment models to ensuring risk equivalence: A pathway to resilient fisheries management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Cabral, Joilson de Assis & Freitas Cabral, Maria Viviana de & Pereira Júnior, Amaro Olímpio, 2020. "Elasticity estimation and forecasting: An analysis of residential electricity demand in Brazil," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Das, Prashant & Füss, Roland & Hanle, Benjamin & Russ, Isabel Nina, 2020. "The cross-over effect of irrational sentiments in housing, commercial property, and stock markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Thé, Jesse & Yu, Hesheng, 2017. "A critical review on the simulations of wind turbine aerodynamics focusing on hybrid RANS-LES methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 257-289.
    6. Lai-Wang Wang & Thanh-Tuyen Tran & Nhu-Ty Nguyen, 2015. "An Empirical Study of Hybrid DEA and Grey System Theory on Analyzing Performance: A Case from Indian Mining Industry," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2015(1).
    7. Ioannis Badounas & Georgios Pitselis, 2020. "Loss Reserving Estimation With Correlated Run-Off Triangles in a Quantile Longitudinal Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Artur Budzyński & Maria Cieśla, 2025. "Enhancing Road Freight Price Forecasting Using Gradient Boosting Ensemble Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Chang, Andrew C. & Hanson, Tyler J., 2016. "The accuracy of forecasts prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 23-43.
    10. Michael Kostmann & Wolfgang K. Härdle, 2019. "Forecasting in Blockchain-Based Local Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.
    11. Hayat, Aziz & Bhatti, M. Ishaq, 2013. "Masking of volatility by seasonal adjustment methods," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 676-688.
    12. Pankaj Kumar, 2021. "Deep Hawkes Process for High-Frequency Market Making," Papers 2109.15110, arXiv.org.
    13. Bloom, David E. & Canning, David & Fink, Gunther & Finlay, Jocelyn E., 2007. "Does age structure forecast economic growth?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 569-585.
    14. Mengyang Wang & Hui Wang & Jiao Wang & Hongwei Liu & Rui Lu & Tongqing Duan & Xiaowen Gong & Siyuan Feng & Yuanyuan Liu & Zhuang Cui & Changping Li & Jun Ma, 2019. "A novel model for malaria prediction based on ensemble algorithms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, 2020. "On the statistical differences between binary forecasts and real-world payoffs," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1228-1240.
    16. Andrikopoulos, Andreas & Merika, Anna & Stoupos, Nikolaos, 2025. "The effect of oil prices on the US shipping stock prices: The mediating role of freight rates and economic indicators," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    17. Olivares, Kin G. & Meetei, O. Nganba & Ma, Ruijun & Reddy, Rohan & Cao, Mengfei & Dicker, Lee, 2024. "Probabilistic hierarchical forecasting with deep Poisson mixtures," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 470-489.
    18. Marco Zanotti, 2025. "On the stability of global forecasting models," Working Papers 553, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics.
    19. Marcelo Bourguignon, 2016. "Poisson–geometric INAR(1) process for modeling count time series with overdispersion," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 70(3), pages 176-192, August.
    20. Dima, Bogdan & Dima, Ştefana Maria & Ioan, Roxana, 2025. "The short-run impact of investor expectations’ past volatility on current predictions: The case of VIX," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    21. Ling Tang & Chengyuan Zhang & Tingfei Li & Ling Li, 2021. "A novel BEMD-based method for forecasting tourist volume with search engine data," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(5), pages 1015-1038, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:113226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dekanatssekretariat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivthdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.