IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evidence and Evolution : A Review


  • Christian P. Robert



Evidence and Evolution: the Logic behind the Science was publishedin 2008 by Elliott Sober. It examines the philosophical foundations of the sta-tistical arguments used to evaluate hypotheses in evolutionary biology, based onsimple examples and likelihood ratios. The difficulty with reading the book froma statistician’s perspective is the reluctance of the author to engage into modelbuilding and even less into parameter estimation. The first chapter nonethelessconstitutes a splendid coverage of the most common statistical approaches to test-ing and model comparison, even though the advocation of the Akaike informationcriterion against Bayesian alternatives is rather forceful. The book also covers anexamination of the "intelligent design" arguments against the Darwinian evolutiontheory, predictably if unnecessarily resorting to Popperian arguments to correctlyargue that the creationist perspective fails to predict anything. The followingchapters cover the more relevant issues of assessing selection versus drift and oftesting for the presence of a common ancestor. While remaining a philosophytreatise, Evidence and Evolution is written in a way that is accessible to laymen, ifrather unusual from a statistician viewpoint, and the insight about testing issuesgained from Evidence and Evolution makes it a worthwhile read.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian P. Robert, 2010. "Evidence and Evolution : A Review," Working Papers 2010-23, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
  • Handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2010-23

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Crest working paper version
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Hartmann, Simon, 2012. "The conceptual flaws of the new EU development agenda from a political economy perspective, or why change is problematic for a donor-driven development policy," Working Papers 35, Österreichische Forschungsstiftung für Internationale Entwicklung (ÖFSE) / Austrian Foundation for Development Research.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2010-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sri Srikandan). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.