IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Retornos a la educación sesgo de habilidad. Teoría y aplicaciones en Colombia

  • Andrés Casas

    ()

  • Juan Miguel Gallego

    ()

  • Carlos Sepúlveda

    ()

Este trabajo presenta una discusión acerca de los retornos a la inversión en educación y de su estimación para el caso colombiano. El marco teórico esta dado por la literatura del capital humano en educación, los aspectos de estimación de dichos retornos, los problemas de omitir en la especificación econométrica el efecto de variables como la habilidad de los individuos y la forma en que se ha intentado solucionar el sesgo derivado de tal omisión. Para la estimación de los retornos educativos se utilizaron dos bases en diferentes periodos del tiempo. La primera es una encuesta realizada para trabajadores bogotanos en 1988 y la segunda, la Encuesta de Calidad de Vida de 1997. Aunque dichas encuestas no son comparables entre si, se encuentra un sesgo de habilidad positivo, al parecer no muy significativo. Al utilizar una variable de caracterización socioeconómica como instrumento para la corrección de los retornos se encuentra una sobreestimación de los mismos, resultado similar al encontrado en la literatura internacional. Además, se muestra evidencia de poca movilidad intergeneracional, ya que trabajadores cuyos padres tienen educación superior obtienen unos mayores retornos. ************************************************************************ This work presents a discussion about the returns to the investment in education and its estimation to the Colombian case. The theory framework is gave by the literature of the human capital in education, the aspects of estimation of these returns, the problems to omit in the econometric specification the effect of variables as the ability of the individuals and the form in which the bias derived from such omission has tried to be solved. For the estimation of the educative returns two data in different periods from the time were used. The first, originating one of a survey made for Bogotá's workers in 1988 and second, from the "Encuesta de Calidad de Vida" of 1997. Although these surveys are not comparable, there is a positive ability bias, apparently not very significant. When we use a variable of socioeconomic characterization as instrument for the correction of the returns there is an upward bias; this result is similar to the found in international literature. In addition, there is evidence of little intergenerational mobility, since workers whose parents have higher education obtain greater returns.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.urosario.edu.co/FASE1/economia/documentos/pdf/bi24.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO in its series BORRADORES DE INVESTIGACIÓN with number 003467.

as
in new window

Length: 25
Date of creation: 01 May 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:col:000091:003467
Contact details of provider:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Joshua Angrist & Alan B. Krueger, 2001. "Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments," NBER Working Papers 8456, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  2. Altonji, Joseph G & Dunn, Thomas A, 1996. "The Effects of Family Characteristics on the Return to Education," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 78(4), pages 692-704, November.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000091:003467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Paola Villalobos)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.