IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Quality in and Equality of Access to Healthcare Services in England

  • Maria Goddard

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York)

Registered author(s):

    This “country report” for England is part of a larger, collaborative effort between eight European countries to document and analyse access to health care services. Key points from the country reports have been collated into an overall report for the European Commission, the funders of the project. The purpose of this report is to identify and analyze barriers to access to health care services which are faced by vulnerable groups in society, and especially those most exposed to social exclusion. In addition, the report reviews the policy initiatives aimed at improving access and equity of access, highlighting the features that appear to be most promising in achieving these aims. This report addresses only the specific aims of the project brief and therefore does not cover the full range of issues related to access and quality.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/researchpapers/rp40_access_to_healthcare_services_in_england.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2008
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics, University of York in its series Working Papers with number 040cherp.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 69 pages
    Date of creation: Aug 2008
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:40cherp
    Contact details of provider: Postal: York Y010 5DD
    Phone: (01904) 321401
    Fax: (0)1904 323759
    Web page: http://www.york.ac.uk/che
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Anne R Mason & Peter C Smith, 2005. "Description of the Benefit Catalogue England," Working Papers 002cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    2. Katharina Hauck & Andrew Street, 2007. "Do targets matter? A comparison of English and Welsh National Health priorities," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 275-290.
    3. Maria Goddard & Peter Smith, 1998. "Equity of access to health care," Working Papers 032cheop, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:40cherp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Frances Sharp)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.