IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Performance indicators for primary care management in the NHS

Listed author(s):
  • Antonio Giuffrida
  • Hugh Gravelle
  • Martin Rowland

There is increased emphasis on the measurement of performance in the NHS. Following the White Paper, additional high level indicators for measuring primary care performance at Health Authority level have been proposed by the NHS Executive. These include measures based on prescribing and on hospital admission rates for certain acute and chronic conditions. It is suggested that higher hospital admission rates for some conditions may indicate deficiencies in their management in primary care. In this paper we argue that there are difficulties with some of the proposed measures. The difficulties arise because individual single indicators are used to attempt to reflect more than one aspect of performance, may have large year to year variation and be subject to confounding. Using data on Family Health Services Authorities (FHSAs) from 1989/90 to 1994/5 we investigate how admission rates, and the ranking of FHSAs by admission rates, vary as socio-economic and secondary and primary care supply conditions are allowed for. The impact of socio-economic factors on admission rates and rankings is at least as large as the impact of the age and sex structure of FHSA populations. Allowing also for secondary care supply conditions has a smaller, but still noticeable, effect. We suggest that if admission rates are used as performance indicators in primary care they should be standardised for socio-economic and supply conditions, as well as for demographic factors. We also make a number of other suggestions for improving the indicators. Length: 34 pages

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: First version, 1998
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics, University of York in its series Working Papers with number 160chedp.

in new window

Date of creation: Sep 1998
Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:160chedp
Contact details of provider: Postal:
York Y010 5DD

Phone: (01904) 321401
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Wu, De-Min, 1973. "Alternative Tests of Independence Between Stochastic Regressors and Disturbances," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 733-750, July.
  2. Godfrey, L. G. & Hutton, J. P., 1994. "Discriminating between errors-in- variables/simultaneity and misspecification in linear regression models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 359-364, April.
  3. Hausman, Jerry, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
  4. Antonio Giuffrida & Hugh Gravelle, 2001. "Measuring performance in primary care: econometric analysis and DEA," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 163-175.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:160chedp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Frances Sharp)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.