IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12892.html

Financing the Scalable Stage: Technology, Donations, and Earned Revenue in the Performing Arts

Author

Listed:
  • Christos A. Makridis

Abstract

This paper studies how digital distribution changes the financing mix of a nonprofit performing-arts organization when audience access becomes scalable but live production remains labor intensive. The organization chooses quality, live ticket prices, and digital access to maximize quality-adjusted service subject to break-even; a donor then contributes after observing earned revenue and the mission supported by each donated dollar. The model yields three results. First, higher live-production wages raise the contribution share but reduce donations, production, and mission output. Second, for a fixed digital strategy, better distribution technology lowers the contribution share while raising donations because earned revenue and audience reach increase the mission supported by each donated dollar. Third, the organization commercializes digital access when the monetization gain exceeds the donor-valued loss from narrower access. The commercialization threshold rises with Baumol pressure and falls as digital access becomes easier to monetize. Numerical experiments with endogenous quality, ticket prices, and commercialization generate open, mixed, and commercial regimes. Donations can therefore rise even as their share of operating resources falls, while digital distribution helps finance the labor-intensive live core.

Suggested Citation

  • Christos A. Makridis, 2026. "Financing the Scalable Stage: Technology, Donations, and Earned Revenue in the Performing Arts," CESifo Working Paper Series 12892, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12892.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Steinberg, 1986. "The Revealed Objective Functions of Nonprofit Firms," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(4), pages 508-526, Winter.
    2. Trine Bille, 2024. "The values of cultural goods and cultural capital externalities: state of the art and future research prospects," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 48(3), pages 347-365, September.
    3. Andreoni, James & Payne, A. Abigail, 2011. "Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising? Evidence from a panel of charities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(5-6), pages 334-343, June.
    4. Juan D. Montoro-Pons & María Caballer-Tarazona & Manuel Cuadrado-García, 2023. "Assessing complementarities between live performances and YouTube video streaming," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 2953-2978, December.
    5. Karol J. Borowiecki & Marc T. Law, 2026. "Creators as firms: the organization of creative production," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 50(2), pages 371-398, June.
    6. Henry Hansmann, 1981. "Nonprofit Enterprise in the Performing Arts," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 12(2), pages 341-361, Autumn.
    7. Andreoni, James, 1990. "Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 100(401), pages 464-477, June.
    8. James Andreoni & A. Abigail Payne, 2003. "Do Government Grants to Private Charities Crowd Out Giving or Fund-raising?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 792-812, June.
    9. Throsby, David, 1994. "The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-29, March.
    10. Pascal Courty & Silvia Marchesi, 2026. "Correction: Theoretical foundations of cultural economics: introduction to the special issue," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 50(2), pages 299-299, June.
    11. David Throsby & John R. Severn & Katya Petetskaya, 2024. "Preference formation in demand for live theatre," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 48(2), pages 285-310, June.
    12. Seaman, Bruce A, 1981. "Economic Theory and the Positive Economics of Arts Financing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(2), pages 335-340, May.
    13. Christos A. Makridis, 2025. "The labor market returns of being an artist: evidence from the United States, 2006–2021," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(1), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Arthur Brooks & Jan Ondrich, 2007. "Quality, service level, or empire: which is the objective of the nonprofit arts firm?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 31(2), pages 129-142, June.
    15. Ricard Gil & S. Abraham Ravid & Olav Sorenson, 2025. "Talent and technology in creative industries: introduction to the special issue," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(2), pages 241-255, June.
    16. Kazuhiko Mikami, 2020. "On the emergence of non‐profit orchestras," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(2), pages 169-189, June.
    17. Hasan Bakhshi & David Throsby, 2014. "Digital complements or substitutes? A quasi-field experiment from the Royal National Theatre," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(1), pages 1-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ekaterina Melnik & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 2015. "The We and the I: The Logic of Voluntary Associations," Working Papers halshs-01109609, HAL.
    2. Zachary Halberstam & James R. Hines Jr., 2023. "Quality-Aware Tax Incentives for Charitable Contributions," CESifo Working Paper Series 10250, CESifo.
    3. Scharf, Kimberley, 2014. "Impure prosocial motivation in charity provision: Warm-glow charities and implications for public funding," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 50-57.
    4. Christian Handke & Carolina Dalla Chiesa, 2022. "The art of crowdfunding arts and innovation: the cultural economic perspective," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(2), pages 249-284, June.
    5. Kazuhiko Mikami, 2020. "On the emergence of non‐profit orchestras," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(2), pages 169-189, June.
    6. Paskalev, Zdravko & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2017. "A theory of outsourced fundraising: Why dollars turn into “Pennies for Charity”," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-18.
    7. Katia Melnik & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 2008. "An Economic Approach To Voluntary Association," Working Papers halshs-00347448, HAL.
    8. Lilley, Andrew & Slonim, Robert, 2014. "The price of warm glow," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 58-74.
    9. Pascal Courty & Silvia Marchesi, 2026. "Correction: Theoretical foundations of cultural economics: introduction to the special issue," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 50(2), pages 299-299, June.
    10. Behrens, Christoph & Emrich, Eike & Hämmerle, Martin & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2017. "Match quality, crowding out, and crowding in: Empirical evidence for German sports clubs," Working Papers of the European Institute for Socioeconomics 21, European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken.
    11. Traub, Stefan, 2005. "Quality Investment and Price Formation in the Performing Arts Sector: A Spatial Analysis," Economics Working Papers 2005-16, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
    12. Andrea Baldin & Trine Bille & Andrea Ellero & Daniela Favaretto, 2018. "Revenue and attendance simultaneous optimization in performing arts organizations," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(4), pages 677-700, November.
    13. Krasteva, Silvana & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2013. "(Un)Informed charitable giving," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 14-26.
    14. Cozzi, Guido & Mantovan, Noemi & Sauer, Robert M., 2013. "Does it Pay to Work for Free? Wage Returns and Gender Differences in the Market for Volunteers," Economics Working Paper Series 1330, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    15. Gong, Ning & Grundy, Bruce D., 2014. "The design of charitable fund-raising schemes: Matching grants or seed money," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 147-165.
    16. Andreoni, James & Payne, Abigail & Smith, Sarah, 2014. "Do grants to charities crowd out other income? Evidence from the UK," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 75-86.
    17. Matthew Kotchen & Katherine R.H. Wagner, 2019. "Crowding In with Impure Altruism: Theory and Evidence from Volunteerism in National Parks," NBER Working Papers 26445, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Arthur Brooks & Jan Ondrich, 2007. "Quality, service level, or empire: which is the objective of the nonprofit arts firm?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 31(2), pages 129-142, June.
    19. Teresa D. Harrison & Daniel J. Henderson & Deniz Ozabaci & Christopher A. Laincz, 2023. "Does one size fit all in the non‐profit donation production function?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 85(2), pages 373-402, April.
    20. Ruffini, Krista & Öztürk, Orgül & Pekgün, Pelin, 2025. "In-kind government assistance and crowd-out of charitable services: Evidence from free school meals," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature
    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
    • D64 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.