IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12512.html

Sherlocking: The Effects of Platform-Owner Entry on the Competitive Behavior of Third-Party Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin T. Leyden

Abstract

I study how third-party firms respond when a platform owner enters its own marketplace, analyzing Apple's entries into App Store submarkets from 2016-2021. Using text embeddings to define markets and a staggered difference-in-differences design, I find that Apple's entry deters new competitors and shifts incumbents' monetization strategies, but effects vary widely: many markets show no meaningful response, while others move in opposing directions across a host of monetization and quality outcomes. Responses depend on how Apple enters and apps' competitive proximity to Apple. This heterogeneity suggests targeted oversight rather than categorical restrictions on platform-owner entry.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin T. Leyden, 2026. "Sherlocking: The Effects of Platform-Owner Entry on the Competitive Behavior of Third-Party Firms," CESifo Working Paper Series 12512, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12512.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Anderson & Özlem Bedre Defolie, 2024. "Hybrid platform model: monopolistic competition and a dominant firm," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 55(4), pages 684-718, December.
    2. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W Imbens & Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2023. "When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(1), pages 1-35.
    3. Gerard Hoberg & Gordon Phillips, 2016. "Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(5), pages 1423-1465.
    4. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Wael Jabr & Dennis Kundisch, 2020. "The Fate of the App: Economic Implications of Updating under Reputation Resetting," Working Papers Dissertations 76, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    5. MacKinnon, James G. & Nielsen, Morten Ørregaard & Webb, Matthew D., 2023. "Cluster-robust inference: A guide to empirical practice," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 272-299.
    6. Feng Zhu & Qihong Liu, 2018. "Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 2618-2642, October.
    7. Marianne Bertrand & Esther Duflo & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004. "How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(1), pages 249-275.
    8. Andrei Hagiu & Tat‐How Teh & Julian Wright, 2022. "Should platforms be allowed to sell on their own marketplaces?," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(2), pages 297-327, June.
    9. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    10. Wen Wen & Feng Zhu, 2019. "Threat of platform‐owner entry and complementor responses: Evidence from the mobile app market," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(9), pages 1336-1367, September.
    11. Bruce E. Hansen, 2025. "Standard Errors for Difference‐in‐Difference Regression," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 291-309, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roth, Jonathan & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Bilinski, Alyssa & Poe, John, 2023. "What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2218-2244.
    2. Chongwoo Choe & Antoine Dubus & Noriaki Matsushima & Shiva Shekhar, 2025. "Data-Driven Platform Encroachment," CESifo Working Paper Series 12233, CESifo.
    3. Ashesh Rambachan & Jonathan Roth, 2026. "Design-Based Uncertainty for Quasi-Experiments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 121(553), pages 477-491, January.
    4. Sunny R. Karim & Morten {O}rregaard Nielsen & James G. MacKinnon & Matthew D. Webb, 2026. "Improved Inference for CSDID Using the Cluster Jackknife," Papers 2602.12043, arXiv.org.
    5. Shu He & Jing Peng & Jianbin Li & Liping Xu, 2020. "Impact of Platform Owner’s Entry on Third-Party Stores," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1467-1484, December.
    6. Dmitry Arkhangelsky & Guido Imbens, 2023. "Causal Models for Longitudinal and Panel Data: A Survey," Papers 2311.15458, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    7. Bruno Ferman, 2023. "Inference in difference‐in‐differences: How much should we trust in independent clusters?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 358-369, April.
    8. Mi Hyun Lee & Sang Pil Han & Sungho Park & Wonseok Oh, 2023. "Positive Demand Spillover of Popular App Adoption: Implications for Platform Owners’ Management of Complements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 961-995, September.
    9. Martin Peitz, 2025. "Governance and Regulation of Platforms," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, edition 0, chapter 23, pages 565-593, Springer.
    10. Tobias Kircher & Jens Foerderer, 2024. "Ban Targeted Advertising? An Empirical Investigation of the Consequences for App Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 1070-1092, February.
    11. Jonathan E. Prunty & Jinbao Zhang & Madalina Toma & Robin Miller & Julien Forder, 2025. "Effect of strengths-based care: community led support," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Cristina Vaquero‐Piñeiro & Eleonora Pierucci, 2026. "Spirit of Innovation or Historical Tradition? The Complex Dilemma of EU Policy for Renowned Products," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 214-247, January.
    13. Peter Z. Schochet, 2022. "Statistical Power for Estimating Treatment Effects Using Difference-in-Differences and Comparative Interrupted Time Series Estimators With Variation in Treatment Timing," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(4), pages 367-405, August.
    14. Leda Maria Bonazzi & Riccardo Martina & Giovanni Ursino, 2025. "Hybrid platforms with free entry: demand-enhancing activities," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 52(1), pages 81-106, March.
    15. Peter Z. Schochet, 2021. "Statistical Power for Estimating Treatment Effects Using Difference-in-Differences and Comparative Interrupted Time Series Designs with Variation in Treatment Timing," Papers 2102.06770, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    16. Chen, Steven Xianglong & Cao, Zhangfan & Zheng, Xiaolan, 2025. "Does trade secret protection spur human capital investment? Evidence from the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    17. Kamila Cygan-Rehm, 2022. "Lifetime Consequences of Lost Instructional Time in the Classroom: Evidence from Shortened School Years," CESifo Working Paper Series 9892, CESifo.
    18. Tianxin Zou & Bo Zhou, 2025. "Self-Preferencing and Search Neutrality in Online Retail Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 4087-4107, May.
    19. Li, Tongxia & Ang, Tze Chuan ‘Chewie’ & Lu, Chun, 2023. "Employment protection and the provision of trade credit," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Raveesh Mayya & Peng Huang, 2025. "Startup Accelerators, Information Asymmetry, and Corporate Venture Capital Investments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(11), pages 9123-9144, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.