IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt6cf8v5cw.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development of Pavement Performance Models by Combining Experimental and Field Data

Author

Listed:
  • Prozzi, J A
  • Madanat, S M

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the development of pavement performance models by combining experimental and field data. A two step approach was used. In the first step a riding quality model based on serviceability consideration is developed. The data set of the American Association of State Highways Officials (AASHO) Road Test is used to this effect. Due to the experimental nature of the AASHO Road Test data set, some of the estimated parameters of the model may be biased when the model is to be applied to predict performance in the field. In the second step, the original model parameters are reestimated by applying joint estimation allowed for with the incorporation of field data set. This data set was collected through the Minnesota Road Research Project (MnRoad). The final model is referred to as the joint model, and it can be used to predict the performance of in-service pavement sections. Joint estimation allowed for the full potential of both data sources to be exploited. First, the effect of variables not available in the first data source were identified and quantified. Further, the parameter estimates had lower variance because multiple data sources were pooled, and biases in the parameters of the experimental model were corrected. Finally, different measurements of the same property were incorporated by using a measurement error model. Thus, the methodology proposed in this paper makes optimum use of available data and yields models of improved statistical properties compared with techniques such as ordinary least squares.

Suggested Citation

  • Prozzi, J A & Madanat, S M, 2004. "Development of Pavement Performance Models by Combining Experimental and Field Data," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6cf8v5cw, University of California Transportation Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt6cf8v5cw
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6cf8v5cw.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madanat, Samer, 1993. "Incorporating inspection decisions in pavement management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 425-438, December.
    2. Humplick, Frannie, 1992. "Highway pavement distress evaluation: Modeling measurement error," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 135-154, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saad Issa Sarsam, 2019. "Assessment of the Deterioration Model for Asphalt Concrete Pavement," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(7), pages 71-80, July.
    2. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Model Uncertainty and the Management of a System of Infrastructure Facilities," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6c84b9b4, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. David Llopis-Castelló & Tatiana García-Segura & Laura Montalbán-Domingo & Amalia Sanz-Benlloch & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Influence of Pavement Structure, Traffic, and Weather on Urban Flexible Pavement Deterioration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Chu, Chih-Yuan & Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2008. "Estimation of dynamic performance models for transportation infrastructure using panel data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 57-81, January.
    5. Lu, Pan & Tolliver, Denver, 2012. "Pavement Pre- and Post-Treatment Performance Models Using LTPP Data," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 51(3).
    6. Nakat, Z. & Madanat, S. & Farshidi, F. & Harvey, J., 2006. "Development of an Empirical-Mechanistic Model of Overlay Crack Progression using Data from the Washington State PMS Database," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0488k9kz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    7. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Robust Maintenance Policies for Markovian Systems under Model Uncertainty," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1d85j6mt, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Anani, Shadi B. & Madanat, Samer M., 2010. "Highway maintenance marginal costs: What if the fourth power assumption is not valid?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 486-495, November.
    9. Dunja Perić & Gyuhyeong Goh & Javad Saeidaskari & Arash Saeidi Rashk Olia & Pooyan Ayar, 2022. "Development of Prediction Models for Performance of Flexible Pavements in Kansas with Emphasis on the Effects of Subgrade and Unbound Layers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Ali A. Hatoum & Jamal M. Khatib & Firas Barraj & Adel Elkordi, 2022. "Survival Analysis for Asphalt Pavement Performance and Assessment of Various Factors Affecting Fatigue Cracking Based on LTPP Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Neil Murray & Heike Link, 2020. "A Duration Approach for Estimating the Marginal Renewal Cost at German Motorways," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1898, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    12. Ciro Caliendo & Maurizio Guida & Emiliana Pepe, 2015. "Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations for Developing a Pavement Performance Model," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(13), pages 199-199, December.
    13. Gungor, Osman Erman & Petit, Antoine Michel Alain & Qiu, Junjie & Zhao, Jingnan & Meidani, Hadi & Wang, Hao & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Al-Qadi, Imad L. & Mann, Justan, 2019. "Development of an overweight vehicle permit fee structure for Illinois," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 26-35.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prozzi, Jorge A, 2001. "Modeling Pavement Performance by Combining Field and Experimental Data," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1gx2425x, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Kobayashi, Kiyoshi & Kaito, Kiyoyuki & Lethanh, Nam, 2012. "A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 544-561.
    3. Lee, Jinwoo & Madanat, Samer, 2015. "A joint bottom-up solution methodology for system-level pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 106-122.
    4. Seites-Rundlett, William & Bashar, Mohammad Z. & Torres-Machi, Cristina & Corotis, Ross B., 2022. "Combined evidence model to enhance pavement condition prediction from highly uncertain sensor data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Dunja Perić & Gyuhyeong Goh & Javad Saeidaskari & Arash Saeidi Rashk Olia & Pooyan Ayar, 2022. "Development of Prediction Models for Performance of Flexible Pavements in Kansas with Emphasis on the Effects of Subgrade and Unbound Layers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Chu, Chih-Yuan & Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2008. "Estimation of dynamic performance models for transportation infrastructure using panel data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 57-81, January.
    7. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. & Madanat, Samer M., 2008. "Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: A quasi-Bayes approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1074-1085, October.
    8. Madanat, S M & Durango, Pablo L & Guillaumot, Vincent M, 2002. "Adaptive Optimization of Infrastructure Maintenance and Inspection Decisions under Performance Model Uncertainty," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2jj604pk, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. Gu, Weihua & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Madanat, Samer, 2012. "Joint optimization of pavement maintenance and resurfacing planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 511-519.
    10. Papakonstantinou, K.G. & Shinozuka, M., 2014. "Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part I: Theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 202-213.
    11. Zhang, Le & Fu, Liangliang & Gu, Weihua & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Hu, Yaohua, 2017. "A general iterative approach for the system-level joint optimization of pavement maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 378-400.
    12. Mishalani, Rabi G. & Gong, Liying, 2009. "Optimal infrastructure condition sampling over space and time for maintenance decision-making under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 311-324, March.
    13. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2007. "A time series analysis framework for transportation infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 493-505, June.
    14. Mishalani, Rabi G. & Koutsopoulos, Haris N., 2002. "Modeling the spatial behavior of infrastructure condition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 171-194, February.
    15. Swei, Omar & Gillen, David & Onayev, Anuarbek, 2021. "Improving productivity measures of producing transportation infrastructure using quality-adjusted price indices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 372-381.
    16. Madanat, S M & Park, Sejung & Kuhn, K D, 2006. "Adaptive Optimization and Systematic Probing of Infrastructure System Maintenance Policies under Model Uncertainty," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4fb7k5rc, University of California Transportation Center.
    17. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Robust Maintenance Policies for Markovian Systems under Model Uncertainty," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1d85j6mt, University of California Transportation Center.
    18. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Robust Maintenance Policies in Asset Management," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt00z6g3pr, University of California Transportation Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt6cf8v5cw. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.