IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/cshedu/qt4s08b4jx.html

REFORMING DOCTORAL EDUCATION: There is a Better Way

Author

Listed:
  • Spronken-Smith, Rachel

Abstract

The traditional apprenticeship model for PhD education involves supervisors mentoring students through a substantive research project and ultimately into academia. Although about half of PhD graduates enter careers beyond academia, this apprenticeship model, with a narrow focus on thesis research has continued to dominate in many countries. While there are variations in terms of coursework requirements, the main assessment continues to be on the PhD thesis, and, in most countries, an oral defense of this thesis. The aims of this working paper are firstly to critique the dominant models of PhD education by using the lens of ‘success’, and secondly to consider an alternative model of PhD education. A PhD program may be deemed successful if it leads to high employment rates, high satisfaction with types of employment, and graduates who are well equipped for being in the world – in work and in society. Through examining these indicators of success, I argue that the North American and British PhD models may be failing, and suggest an alternative model based on ‘constructive alignment’, in which the graduate outcomes are well aligned with teaching and learning methods, and the assessment regime. This alternative model is still based on an apprenticeship approach but requires PhD programs to be tailored to the individual and their desired career pathway, so that alongside and through their research, they can develop a holistic set of graduate attributes – for ‘doctorateness’, for possible careers, and for global citizenship. This model has implications not only for the learning opportunities available to PhD students, but also for how we assess PhDs. Universities may need to develop programs to better support the career planning and professional development of PhD students. A portfolio or digital badge assessment approach, whether summative or formative, would allow PhD graduates to demonstrate the depth and breadth of knowledge and skills they have acquired through doctoral study, and better equip them for their chosen career pathway.

Suggested Citation

  • Spronken-Smith, Rachel, 2018. "REFORMING DOCTORAL EDUCATION: There is a Better Way," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt4s08b4jx, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:cshedu:qt4s08b4jx
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4s08b4jx.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nell Buissink-Smith & Samuel Mann & Kerry Shephard, 2011. "How Do We Measure Affective Learning in Higher Education?," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 5(1), pages 101-114, March.
    2. Bennion, Alice & Locke, William, 2010. "The Early Career Paths and Employment Conditions of the Academic Profession in 17 Countries," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(S1), pages 7-33, May.
    3. Richard C. Larson & Navid Ghaffarzadegan & Yi Xue, 2014. "Too Many PhD Graduates or Too Few Academic Job Openings: The Basic Reproductive Number R0 in Academia," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 745-750, November.
    4. Ann E. Austin, 2002. "Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 94-122, January.
    5. David Cyranoski & Natasha Gilbert & Heidi Ledford & Anjali Nayar & Mohammed Yahia, 2011. "Education: The PhD factory," Nature, Nature, vol. 472(7343), pages 276-279, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Zaheer Asghar & Javed Iqbal & Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen & Elena Barbera & Fatih Mutlu Ozbilen & Yasira Waqar, 2023. "Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Modeling: Applying Vitae Researchers’ Development Framework through the Lens of Web 2.0 Technologies for Vocational-Health Education Researchers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Muhammad Zaheer Asghar & Seema Arif & Javed Iqbal & Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, 2022. "Social Media Tools for the Development of Pre-Service Health Sciences Researchers during COVID-19 in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeongeun Kim & Molly Ott & Lindsey Dippold, 2020. "University and Department Influences on Scientists’ Occupational Outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(2), pages 197-228, March.
    2. Robert J Speakman & Carla S Hadden & Matthew H Colvin & Justin Cramb & K C Jones & Travis W Jones & Isabelle Lulewicz & Katharine G Napora & Katherine L Reinberger & Brandon T Ritchison & Alexandra R , 2018. "Market share and recent hiring trends in anthropology faculty positions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Li, Liping & Shen, Wenqin & Xie, Ailei, 2021. "Why students leave Chinese elite universities for doctoral studies abroad: Institutional habitus, career script and college graduates’ decision to study abroad," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Smirnova, Inna & Shannon, Austin & Teplitskiy, Misha, 2025. "The effect of trainee career intentions on mentor's interest in the trainee: Experimental evidence from academia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    5. Santos, João M. & Horta, Hugo & Heitor, Manuel, 2016. "Too many PhDs? An invalid argument for countries developing their scientific and academic systems: The case of Portugal," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 352-362.
    6. Clara Boothby & Staša Milojević, 2021. "An exploratory full-text analysis of Science Careers in a changing academic job market," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4055-4071, May.
    7. Gen-Chang Hsu & Wei-Jiun Lin & Syuan-Jyun Sun, 2023. "Temporal trends in academic performance and career duration of principal investigators in ecology and evolutionary biology in Taiwan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3437-3451, June.
    8. Andrea M Zimmerman, 2018. "Navigating the path to a biomedical science career," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Catherine E. Déri & Émilie Tremblay-Wragg & Sara Mathieu-C., 2022. "Academic Writing Groups in Higher Education: History and State of Play," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-85, February.
    10. Anaïs Glorieux & Bram Spruyt & Petrus te Braak & Joeri Minnen & Theun Pieter van Tienoven, 2024. "When the Student Becomes the Teacher: Determinants of Self-Estimated Successful PhD Completion Among Graduate Teaching Assistants," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    11. Kirstin R W Matthews & Kara M Calhoun & Nathan Lo & Vivian Ho, 2011. "The Aging of Biomedical Research in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-6, December.
    12. Ghaleb Alnahdi & Dimitris Anastasiou, 2020. "Recruitment Practices for Special Education Faculty: Implications for Saudi Universities," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, August.
    13. Bäker, Agnes, 2015. "Non-tenured post-doctoral researchers’ job mobility and research output: An analysis of the role of research discipline, department size, and coauthors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 634-650.
    14. Böttcher, Wolfgang & Krüger, Heinz-Hermann, 2009. "Evaluation der Qualität der Promotionskollegs der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung: Eine quantitative und qualitative Studie," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 234.
    15. Shibayama, Sotaro, 2019. "Sustainable development of science and scientists: Academic training in life science labs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 676-692.
    16. Conti, Annamaria & Visentin, Fabiana, 2015. "A revealed preference analysis of PhD students’ choices over employment outcomes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1931-1947.
    17. Stefan Reichmann & Thomas Klebel & Ilire Hasani‐Mavriqi & Tony Ross‐Hellauer, 2021. "Between administration and research: Understanding data management practices in an institutional context," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(11), pages 1415-1431, November.
    18. Sofia Patsali & Michele Pezzoni & Fabiana Visentin, 2021. "The Impact of Research Independence on PhD Students’ Careers: Large-Scale Evidence from France," Post-Print hal-03564708, HAL.
    19. Ambika Mathur & Annmarie Cano & Michael Kohl & Nisansala S Muthunayake & Prassanna Vaidyanathan & Mary E Wood & Mustafa Ziyad, 2018. "Visualization of gender, race, citizenship and academic performance in association with career outcomes of 15-year biomedical doctoral alumni at a public research university," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Christopher Zou & Julia Tsui & Jordan B. Peterson, 2018. "The publication trajectory of graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, and new professors in psychology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1289-1310, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:cshedu:qt4s08b4jx. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/cshe/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.