Technology Acquisition and Growth of Firms Under Changing Policy Regimes: A Study of the Indian Automobile Sector
This paper attempts to analyse the determinants of growth of Indian automobile firms during three different policy regimes, namely licensing (1980-81 to 84-85), de-regulation (1985-86 to 1990-91) and liberalisation (1991-92 to 1995-96). The analysis broadly follows the evolutionary theoretical framework. It is argued that differences among firms in terms of technology acquisition explain much of the firm level variation in growth. To incorporate firm specific and inter-temporal changes, the study used two-way fixed effects estimation of the growth function. The results of this exercise support the view that inter-firm differences in growth in this industry in India are determined by variables capturing technology paradigm and trajectory shifts. The changing role of technology acquisition variables in determining growth is also borne out by the results of this exercise, thereby broadly confirming the basic tenets of Penrose (1959), Marris (1964), Geroski (1995) and the evolutionary theorists. Further, if one accounts for the role of technology, vertical integration, capital intensity and the age of the firm, size of the firm does provide a firm with positive advantages to grow. The results of this paper also confirm the hypothesis of the Marris model that profitability determines a firm's ability and willingness to grow and point out that, while vertical integration poses severe constraints in maximising growth, firms that are efficient in utilising their capital stock and the new ones grow at a faster rate than their older counterparts.
|Date of creation:||Jun 2001|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Delhi 110 007|
Phone: (011) 27667005
Fax: (011) 27667159
Web page: http://www.cdedse.org/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Web: http://www.cdedse.org/ Email: |
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Geroski, P. A., 1995. "What do we know about entry?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 421-440, December.
- Raut, Lakshmi K., 1995. "R & D spillover and productivity growth: Evidence from Indian private firms," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 1-23, October.
- Narayanan, K., 1997.
"Technology Acquisition, De-regulation and Competitiveness: A Study of Indian Automobile Industry,"
UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series
3, United Nations University - INTECH.
- Narayanan, K., 1998. "Technology acquisition, de-regulation and competitiveness: a study of Indian automobile industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 215-228, June.
- Bronwyn H. Hall, 1986.
"The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector,"
NBER Working Papers
1965, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hall, Bronwyn H, 1987. "The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 583-606, June.
- Ajit Singh & Geoffrey Whittington, 1975.
"The Size and Growth of Firms,"
Review of Economic Studies,
Oxford University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 15-26.
- Siddharthan, N S & Lall, Sanjaya, 1982. "The Recent Growth of the Largest U.S. Multinationals," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 44(1), pages 1-13, February.
- Basant, Rakesh, 1997. "Technology strategies of large enterprises in Indian industry: Some explorations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1683-1700, October.
- Teece, David J, 1977. "Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-how," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 87(346), pages 242-261, June.
- Cohen, Wesley M & Levinthal, Daniel A, 1989. "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(397), pages 569-596, September.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cde:cdewps:93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sanjeev Sharma)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.