IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The interaction between unit and item nonresponse in view of the reverse cooperation continuum

Listed author(s):
  • Oliver Serfling

    (University of Basel)

Registered author(s):

    The paper addresses two questions. First, is item nonresponse (INR) a precursor of panel attrition (UNR), as predicted by the theory of a latent cooperation continuum, or is the interrelation of another type? Second, are the results in models of item nonresponse behavior affected by a selectivity bias due to panel attrition? We test the hypothesis of a latent cooperation continuum with data taken from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) - and can not find evidence for it. In contrast, we hypothesize that the relationship of both nonresponse types may be inverse in principle (the reverse cooperation continuum) and both types of cooperation may coexist. Besides unit nonresponse we analyze questionnaire nonresponse, i.e. participating but refusing a whole questionnaire with specific items in a multi-questionnaire survey. We find evidence for negative correlation of INR with questionnaire nonresponse. The correlation between item and unit nonresponse is inverse U-shaped which supports the hypothesis of coexistence of both types of cooperation. Addressing the second question we test whether panel attrition causes endogenous sample selection in regressions of INR by means of a bivariate probit model for selection correction. Additionally we use Monte Carlo simulations to test the influence of alternative assumptions for INR-behavior of attriters. The results show that attrition bias is item-specific. Existence and magnitude of the bias differs with the analyzed subsample.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel in its series Working papers with number 2004/02.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2004
    Handle: RePEc:bsl:wpaper:2004/02
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Peter-Merian-Weg 6, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Jörg-Peter Schräpler, 2001. "Respondent Behavior in Panel Studies: A Case Study of the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP)," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 244, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    3. Daniel H. Hill & Robert J. Willis, 2001. "Reducing Panel Attrition: A Search for Effective Policy Instruments," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 36(3), pages 416-438.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bsl:wpaper:2004/02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (WWZ)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.