IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.11691.html

Diffusive Market Impact: A Consistent Microfoundation

Author

Listed:
  • Julius F. Bonart

Abstract

Structural price diffusivity explains many empirical regularities of market impact including the ``square-root law'' and its crossover to a linear regime for low trading rates \citep{bonart2026diffusive}. One of its central predictions is that an information-neutral trading strategy generates a diffusive impact state. We microfound this result in an economy with a trader and many arbitrageurs who progressively eliminate predictable returns. Each arbitrageur observes realized returns and a private signal of one component of the fundamental return. As aggregate private information becomes complete and under suitable convergence to a stationary limit, the trader's impact law is of the form $j=U\cdot w$, where $w$ is the innovation in the trading schedule and $U$ is causal all-pass. Impact returns are therefore white, even though no individual arbitrageur can reconstruct the underlying trading strategy. We then investigate the economic meaning of the impact phase. We argue that the $U$ which has minimum distance from the filter $L$ generating the trade flow is an especially interesting candidate: Trade flow is then minimally distorted under impact and arbitrage, and it always guarantees positive impact costs. Under a trader flow generated by a biexponential $L$ (the simplest form allowed in our model) an interesting result emerges: Impact decline is confined to a narrow band of $50\%$--$60\%$, lower than some empirical estimates and quite consistent with others. More complicated flow models can lead to different decays. Finally, we argue that in real markets, the impact phase is probably somewhat ``distorted'' in its long-term tails which allows for a full relaxation of the impact propagator. The effect is weak, long-term mean-reversion of the impact state.

Suggested Citation

  • Julius F. Bonart, 2026. "Diffusive Market Impact: A Consistent Microfoundation," Papers 2610.11691, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.11691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.11691
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. -P. Bouchaud & I. Mastromatteo & B. Toth, 2026. "On Bonart's interpretation of the Square-Root Impact Law," Papers 2610.10053, arXiv.org.
    2. Louis Saddier & Matteo Marsili, 2023. "A Bayesian theory of market impact," Papers 2303.08867, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    3. Hasbrouck, Joel, 1991. "Measuring the Information Content of Stock Trades," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(1), pages 179-207, March.
    4. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Yuval Gefen & Marc Potters & Matthieu Wyart, 2004. "Fluctuations and response in financial markets: the subtle nature of 'random' price changes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 176-190.
    5. J. Doyne Farmer & Austin Gerig & Fabrizio Lillo & Szabolcs Mike, 2006. "Market efficiency and the long-memory of supply and demand: is price impact variable and permanent or fixed and temporary?," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 107-112.
    6. Glosten, Lawrence R. & Milgrom, Paul R., 1985. "Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 71-100, March.
    7. J. Doyne Farmer & Austin Gerig & Fabrizio Lillo & Henri Waelbroeck, 2013. "How efficiency shapes market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(11), pages 1743-1758, November.
    8. Kyle, Albert S, 1985. "Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1315-1335, November.
    9. A. C. Barato & I. Mastromatteo & M. Bardoscia & M. Marsili, 2013. "Impact of meta-order in the Minority Game," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(9), pages 1343-1352, September.
    10. Guillaume Maitrier & Grégoire Loeper & Kiyoshi Kanazawa & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2026. "The ‘double’ square-root law: evidence for the mechanical origin of market impact using Tokyo stock exchange data," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 491-503, April.
    11. Alfonso Dufour & Robert F. Engle, 2000. "Time and the Price Impact of a Trade," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(6), pages 2467-2498, December.
    12. C. Gomes & H. Waelbroeck, 2015. "Is market impact a measure of the information value of trades? Market response to liquidity vs. informed metaorders," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 773-793, May.
    13. Kempf, Alexander & Korn, Olaf, 1999. "Market depth and order size1," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 29-48, February.
    14. Yuki Sato & Kiyoshi Kanazawa, 2024. "Strict universality of the square-root law in price impact across stocks: a complete survey of the Tokyo stock exchange," Papers 2411.13965, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    15. Jonathan Donier & Julius Bonart, 2014. "A Million Metaorder Analysis of Market Impact on the Bitcoin," Papers 1412.4503, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    16. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Julien Kockelkoren & Marc Potters, 2006. "Random walks, liquidity molasses and critical response in financial markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 115-123.
    17. Damian Eduardo Taranto & Giacomo Bormetti & Fabrizio Lillo, 2014. "The adaptive nature of liquidity taking in limit order books," Papers 1403.0842, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2014.
    18. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Youssef Ouazzani Chahdi & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Gr'egoire Szymanski, 2026. "A unified theory of order flow, market impact, and volatility," Papers 2601.23172, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    19. Bence Toth & Zoltan Eisler & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2017. "The short-term price impact of trades is universal," Papers 1702.08029, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    20. Madhavan, Ananth & Richardson, Matthew & Roomans, Mark, 1997. "Why Do Security Prices Change? A Transaction-Level Analysis of NYSE Stocks," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(4), pages 1035-1064.
    21. Hellwig, Martin F., 1980. "On the aggregation of information in competitive markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 477-498, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & J. Doyne Farmer & Fabrizio Lillo, 2008. "How markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand," Papers 0809.0822, arXiv.org.
    2. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2021. "The Inelastic Market Hypothesis: A Microstructural Interpretation," Papers 2108.00242, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    3. Fabrizio Lillo, 2021. "Order flow and price formation," Papers 2105.00521, arXiv.org.
    4. J. Doyne Farmer & Austin Gerig & Fabrizio Lillo & Henri Waelbroeck, 2013. "How efficiency shapes market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(11), pages 1743-1758, November.
    5. Martin D. Gould & Mason A. Porter & Stacy Williams & Mark McDonald & Daniel J. Fenn & Sam D. Howison, 2010. "Limit Order Books," Papers 1012.0349, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2013.
    6. Olivier Guéant, 2016. "The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From Optimal Execution to Market Making," Post-Print hal-01393136, HAL.
    7. Bonart, Julius & Lillo, Fabrizio, 2018. "A continuous and efficient fundamental price on the discrete order book grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 698-713.
    8. B. Tóth & Z. Eisler & F. Lillo & J. Kockelkoren & J.-P. Bouchaud & J.D. Farmer, 2012. "How does the market react to your order flow?," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(7), pages 1015-1024, May.
    9. Christopher Angstmann & Tim Gebbie, 2026. "Event-Time Order-Flow Memory, Operational-Time Impact, and Subordinated Market Observables," Papers 2609.13715, arXiv.org.
    10. Julius F. Bonart, 2026. "Diffusive in plain sight: An inconspicuous law of market impact," Papers 2606.07059, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
    11. Matthieu Wyart & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Julien Kockelkoren & Marc Potters & Michele Vettorazzo, 2006. "Relation between Bid-Ask Spread, Impact and Volatility in Double Auction Markets," Papers physics/0603084, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2007.
    12. Damian Eduardo Taranto & Giacomo Bormetti & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Fabrizio Lillo & Bence Toth, 2016. "Linear models for the impact of order flow on prices I. Propagators: Transient vs. History Dependent Impact," Papers 1602.02735, arXiv.org.
    13. Julius Bonart & Fabrizio Lillo, 2016. "A continuous and efficient fundamental price on the discrete order book grid," Papers 1608.00756, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.
    14. Thibault Jaisson, 2014. "Market impact as anticipation of the order flow imbalance," Papers 1402.1288, arXiv.org.
    15. Philipp Weber & Bernd Rosenow, 2006. "Large stock price changes: volume or liquidity?," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 7-14.
    16. Thibault Jaisson, 2015. "Liquidity and Impact in Fair Markets," Papers 1506.02507, arXiv.org.
    17. Guillaume Maitrier & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2025. "The Subtle Interplay between Square-root Impact, Order Imbalance & Volatility: A Unifying Framework," Papers 2506.07711, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    18. Zoltán Eisler & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Julien Kockelkoren, 2012. "The price impact of order book events: market orders, limit orders and cancellations," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(9), pages 1395-1419, September.
    19. Cenesizoglu, Tolga & Dionne, Georges & Zhou, Xiaozhou, 2022. "Asymmetric effects of the limit order book on price dynamics," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 77-98.
    20. Rzayev, Khaladdin & Ibikunle, Gbenga, 2019. "A state-space modeling of the information content of trading volume," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.11691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.