IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.27654.html

FedIncome: Federated Learning for Income Estimation in Digital Lending Under Data Sovereignty Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Sultan Amed
  • Tanmay Sen
  • Sayantan Banerjee

Abstract

Verified income is often unavailable in digital loan applications, forcing lenders to rely on reported income and potentially leading to over-lending, overly conservative offers, or rejection of creditworthy applicants. Cross-institutional data-sharing constraints make this problem especially difficult for smaller lenders with limited training data. We introduce FedIncome, a federated learning framework for income estimation that enables institutions to train a shared model without pooling raw borrower records. Using more than one million LendingClub loans partitioned into $50$ state-level clients, we simulate a heterogeneous lending consortium. The best federated model achieves out-of-time $R^2=0.608$, compared with $0.619$ for a pooled centralised benchmark. Small-sample clients obtain an average out-of-time $R^2$ improvement of $3.8$ percentage points relative to the pooled centralised benchmark, while the fitted client-level relationship places the empirical crossover at approximately $4,790$ training observations in this setting. When pooling is infeasible and the relevant alternative is local-only training, federation improves out-of-time performance across all sample-size groups, with the largest gains for data-scarce clients. We also combine federated income estimates with state- and income-specific debt-to-income thresholds. In a retrospective decision analysis, replacing reported income with the federated estimate increases simulated approval rates with only modest changes in observed default rates. FedIncome supports collaborative learning under data-locality constraints with little aggregate loss relative to pooled training and larger gains relative to local-only estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sultan Amed & Tanmay Sen & Sayantan Banerjee, 2026. "FedIncome: Federated Learning for Income Estimation in Digital Lending Under Data Sovereignty Constraints," Papers 2609.27654, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.27654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.27654
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sultan Amed & Tanmay Sen & Sayantan Banerjee, 2026. "FSL-BDP: Federated Survival Learning with Bayesian Differential Privacy for Credit Risk Modeling," Papers 2601.11134, arXiv.org.
    2. Baesens, Bart & Smedts, Kristien, 2025. "Boosting credit risk models," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(4).
    3. Julapa Jagtiani & Catharine Lemieux, 2019. "The roles of alternative data and machine learning in fintech lending: Evidence from the LendingClub consumer platform," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 48(4), pages 1009-1029, December.
    4. Babina, Tania & Fedyk, Anastassia & He, Alex & Hodson, James, 2024. "Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Huan Tang, 2019. "Peer-to-Peer Lenders Versus Banks: Substitutes or Complements?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1900-1938.
    6. Tetyana Balyuk, 2023. "FinTech Lending and Bank Credit Access for Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 555-575, January.
    7. Adair Morse, 2015. "Peer-to-Peer Crowdfunding: Information and the Potential for Disruption in Consumer Lending," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 463-482, December.
    8. Stiglitz, Joseph E & Weiss, Andrew, 1981. "Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(3), pages 393-410, June.
    9. Adair Morse, 2015. "Peer-to-Peer Crowdfunding: Information and the Potential for Disruption in Consumer Lending," NBER Working Papers 20899, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Daron Acemoglu & Ali Makhdoumi & Azarakhsh Malekian & Asu Ozdaglar, 2022. "Too Much Data: Prices and Inefficiencies in Data Markets," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 218-256, November.
    11. Dirk Bergemann & Alessandro Bonatti, 2019. "Markets for Information: An Introduction," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 85-107, August.
    12. Cornelli, Giulio & Frost, Jon & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Rau, P. Raghavendra & Wardrop, Robert & Ziegler, Tania, 2023. "Fintech and big tech credit: Drivers of the growth of digital lending," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bollaert, Helen & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Schwienbacher, Armin, 2021. "Fintech and access to finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Eid, Nourhan & Yang, Junhong & Duygun, Meryem, 2024. "Bridging the credit gap: The influence of regional bank structure on the expansion of peer-to-peer lending," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(6).
    3. Biancini, Sara & Verdier, Marianne, 2023. "Bank-platform competition in the credit market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Dömötör, Barbara & Ölvedi, Tímea, 2021. "A személyközi hitelezés létjogosultsága a pénzügyi közvetítésben [The relevance of peer-to-peer lending in financial intermediation]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 773-793.
    5. Chen, Jiakai & Huang, Wei & Wang, Xinruo, 2025. "Peer-to-peer lending: Shift of pricing regime and changes in risk sensitivity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Khan, Habib Hussain & Ahmad, Mohammad Rais, 2025. "The fintech revolution: Exploring the potential of fintech finance in reducing corporate credit constraints," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Khan, Habib Hussain & Qureshi, Fiza & Jamali, Dima, 2025. "Digital disruption in financing: Are fintech and bigtech credit reshaping corporate access to capital?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Bazley, William & Jannati, Sima, 2024. "The influence of regional sentiment on online borrowing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    9. Sara Biancini & Marianne Verdier, 2023. "Bank-platform competition in the credit market," Post-Print hal-04300815, HAL.
    10. Ping-Lun Tseng & Wen-Chung Guo, 2022. "Fintech, Credit Market Competition, and Bank Asset Quality," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 61(3), pages 285-318, June.
    11. Douglas Cumming & Ahmed Sewaid, 2025. "Crowdlending, Self-Employment, and Entrepreneurial Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 49(2), pages 403-434, March.
    12. Peng, Hongfeng & Ji, Jiao & Sun, Hanwen & Xu, Haofeng, 2023. "Legal enforcement and fintech credit: International evidence," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 214-231.
    13. Erel, Isil & Liebersohn, Jack, 2022. "Can FinTech reduce disparities in access to finance? Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 90-118.
    14. Kräussl, Roman & Kräussl, Zsofia & Pollet, Joshua & Rinne, Kalle, 2024. "The performance of marketplace lenders," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    15. Doerr, Sebastian & Frost, Jon & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Shreeti, Vatsala, 2023. "Big techs in finance," CEPR Discussion Papers 18665, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    16. Danisewicz, Piotr & Elard, Ilaf, 2023. "The real effects of financial technology: Marketplace lending and personal bankruptcy," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. de Roure, Calebe & Pelizzon, Loriana & Tasca, Paolo, 2016. "How does P2P lending fit into the consumer credit market?," Discussion Papers 30/2016, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    18. Nguyen, Dat Thanh & Tran, Vuong Thao & Phan, Dinh Hoang Bach, 2025. "Lending in the crowd, receivables in decline: P2P lending and trade credit," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PD).
    19. Fabio Bertoni & Stefano Bonini & Vincenzo Capizzi & Massimo G. Colombo & Sophie Manigart, 2022. "Digitization in the Market for Entrepreneurial Finance: Innovative Business Models and New Financing Channels," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(5), pages 1120-1135, September.
    20. José María Liberti & Mitchell A. Petersen, 2018. "Information: Hard and Soft," NBER Working Papers 25075, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.27654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.