IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.15802.html

The Economics of Recursive Self-Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Cunningham
  • Lukas Althoff
  • Basil Halperin
  • Brian Jabarian
  • Andrew Koh
  • Arjun Ramani
  • Phil Trammell
  • Parker Whitfill
  • Cheryl Wu

Abstract

We model the economics of recursive self-improvement (RSI) and assess its plausibility and impacts. First, we build a sequence of increasingly rich models of AI progress to highlight the feedback loops behind RSI. We represent our models as directed graphs and show that net acceleration in AI capabilities depends on the product of elasticities across each feedback loop. Second, we distinguish between "narrow" and "broad" AI capabilities, capturing the possibility that AI systems improve narrowly at optimizing AI R&D benchmarks without improving at broader economically valuable tasks. Third, we document existing estimates of key parameters and provide a wish list of empirical objects that AI companies can measure and feasibly share publicly. Finally, we calibrate the model with existing data. A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that feedback loops are not currently strong enough to generate a self-sustaining acceleration, though they appear to be strengthening. We conclude by assessing the plausibility and implications of such an acceleration.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Cunningham & Lukas Althoff & Basil Halperin & Brian Jabarian & Andrew Koh & Arjun Ramani & Phil Trammell & Parker Whitfill & Cheryl Wu, 2026. "The Economics of Recursive Self-Improvement," Papers 2609.15802, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.15802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.15802
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin F. Jones, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence in Research and Development," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Transformative AI, pages 37-61, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Parker Whitfill & Cheryl Wu, 2025. "Will Compute Bottlenecks Prevent an Intelligence Explosion?," Papers 2507.23181, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    3. Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
    4. Jones, Charles I, 1995. "R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(4), pages 759-784, August.
    5. Ege Erdil & Tamay Besiroglu & Anson Ho, 2024. "Estimating Idea Production: A Methodological Survey," Papers 2405.10494, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ege Erdil & Andrei Potlogea & Tamay Besiroglu & Edu Roldan & Anson Ho & Jaime Sevilla & Matthew Barnett & Matej Vrzla & Robert Sandler, 2025. "GATE: An Integrated Assessment Model for AI Automation," Papers 2503.04941, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    2. Shanchao Wang & Julian M. Alston & Philip G. Pardey, 2025. "R&D lags in economic models," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 842-862, August.
    3. Basso, Henrique S. & Jimeno, Juan F., 2021. "From secular stagnation to robocalypse? Implications of demographic and technological changes," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 833-847.
    4. Sitian Liu & Yichen Su, 2026. "The Geography of Research: The Trade-Off Between Knowledge Production and Access," Papers 2608.15981, arXiv.org.
    5. James Malley & Apostolis Philippopoulos, 2023. "Stimulating Long-Term Growth and Welfare in the U.S," CESifo Working Paper Series 10658, CESifo.
    6. Ina Ganguli & Jeffrey Lin & Vitaly Meursault & Nicholas Reynolds, 2026. "Spreading Out Across Expanding Idea Space," Working Papers 26-39, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    7. Nguyen, Manh-Hung, 2026. "Epistemic Capital and Two-Trap Growth in the AI Era," TSE Working Papers 26-1722, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    8. Dinopoulos, Elias & Grieben, Wolf-Heimo & Şener, Fuat, 2023. "A Policy Conundrum: Schumpeterian Growth or Job Creation?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Bernardo Ribeiro, 2026. "Growth With New And Old Technologies," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2515R2, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Jun 2026.
    10. Peter K. Kruse-Andersen, 2019. "Directed Technical Change, Environmental Sustainability, and Population Growth," Discussion Papers 19-12, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    11. Choi, Jin-Uk & Lee, Chang-Yang, 2022. "The differential effects of basic research on firm R&D productivity: The conditioning role of technological diversification," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. M. Sadra Heydari & Zafer Kanik & Santiago Montoya-Bland'on, 2025. "The R&D Productivity Puzzle: Innovation Networks with Heterogeneous Firms," Papers 2512.23337, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    13. Teemu Pekkarinen, 2026. "Data processing growth model," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 46(1), pages 334-341.
    14. Alston, Julian M. & Pardey, Philip G., 2022. "Are Ideas Really Getting Harder to Find?," Staff Papers 320517, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    15. Sabrina T. Howell, 2024. "Government Intervention in Innovation," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 367-390, November.
    16. Peter J. Klenow & Huiyu Li, 2020. "Innovative Growth Accounting," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2020, volume 35, pages 245-295, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Thomas H.W. Ziesemer, 2020. "Can we have growth when population is stagnant? Testing linear growth rate formulas of non-scale endogenous growth models," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(13), pages 1502-1516, March.
    18. Philippe Aghion & Benjamin F. Jones & Charles I. Jones, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 237-282, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Cozzi, Guido, 2021. "Semi-Endogenous or Fully Endogenous Growth? A Simple Unified Theory," MPRA Paper 110681, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Kemnitz, Alexander & Knoblach, Michael, 2020. "Endogenous sigma-augmenting technological change: An R&D-based approach," CEPIE Working Papers 02/20, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.15802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.