IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.23915.html

Equilibrium in closed constant-function market maker economies

Author

Listed:
  • Muqiao Huang
  • Ruodu Wang
  • Yiyun Wang

Abstract

We study equilibria in a closed, fee-free constant-function market maker (CFMM) economy with two assets and two agents. An interior state is a unilateral no-trade equilibrium exactly when the CFMM marginal price equals both agents' marginal rates of substitution. For an interior initial state, individually rational unilateral equilibria are Pareto optimal relative to the fixed CFMM invariant. A weak representative agent is obtained at each fixed equilibrium by weighted sup-convolution, whereas, under some regularity assumptions, a state-independent strong representative agent exists exactly when agents share the same homothetic preference. Every interior feasible state is reachable through finitely many valid trades, but an individually rational interior target need not be improvement reachable. Alternating utility-maximizing trades converge to a Pareto optimal unilateral equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Muqiao Huang & Ruodu Wang & Yiyun Wang, 2026. "Equilibrium in closed constant-function market maker economies," Papers 2608.23915, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.23915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.23915
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shipra Agrawal & Erick Delage & Mark Peters & Zizhuo Wang & Yinyu Ye, 2011. "A Unified Framework for Dynamic Prediction Market Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 550-568, June.
    2. Robin Hanson, 2003. "Combinatorial Information Market Design," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 107-119, January.
    3. Jianjun Gao & Zizhuo Wang & Weiping Wu & Dian Yu, 2025. "Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 157-177, January.
    4. Guillermo Angeris & Hsien-Tang Kao & Rei Chiang & Charlie Noyes & Tarun Chitra, 2019. "An analysis of Uniswap markets," Papers 1911.03380, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    5. Joel Hasbrouck & Thomas J. Rivera & Fahad Saleh, 2026. "An Economic Model of a Decentralized Exchange with Concentrated Liquidity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(5), pages 3666-3683, May.
    6. Robin Hanson, 2007. "Logarithmic Market Scoring Rules for Modular Combinatorial Information Aggregation," Journal of Prediction Markets, University of Buckingham Press, vol. 1(1), pages 3-15, February.
    7. Alfred Lehar & Christine Parlour, 2025. "Decentralized Exchange: The Uniswap Automated Market Maker," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 80(1), pages 321-374, February.
    8. Agostino Capponi & Ruizhe Jia, 2025. "Liquidity Provision on Blockchain-Based Decentralized Exchanges," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 38(10), pages 3040-3085.
    9. 'Alvaro Cartea & Fayc{c}al Drissi & Marcello Monga, 2023. "Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Execution and Speculation," Papers 2307.03499, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    10. Jonathan Chiu & Thorsten V Koeppl, 2019. "Blockchain-Based Settlement for Asset Trading," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1716-1753.
    11. Bruno Biais & Agostino Capponi & Lin William Cong & Vishal Gaur & Kay Giesecke, 2023. "Advances in Blockchain and Crypto Economics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 6417-6426, November.
    12. Andreas Park, 2023. "The Conceptual Flaws of Decentralized Automated Market Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 6731-6751, November.
    13. Cartea, Álvaro & Drissi, Fayçal & Monga, Marcello, 2025. "Decentralised finance and automated market making: Execution and speculation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    14. Mas-Colell, Andreu & Whinston, Michael D. & Green, Jerry R., 1995. "Microeconomic Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195102680.
    15. Joel Hasbrouck & Thomas J. Rivera & Fahad Saleh, 2026. "The Need for Fees at a DEX: How Increases in Fees Can Increase DEX Trading Volume," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(10), pages 8309-8324, October.
    16. Andreas A. Aigner & Gurvinder Dhaliwal, 2021. "UNISWAP: Impermanent Loss and Risk Profile of a Liquidity Provider," Papers 2106.14404, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chu, Gang & Dowling, Michael & Li, Xiao, 2026. "Impermanent loss in cryptocurrency," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Chengqi Zang & Gabriel P. Andrade & Tomoyuki Nakajima, 2026. "Who Aggregates Information? Screening, Rent, and the Coexistence of CLOB and AMM Prediction Markets," Papers 2609.20017, arXiv.org.
    3. Agostino Capponi & 'Alvaro Cartea & Fayc{c}al Drissi, 2026. "The Viability of Blockchain Markets under Discrete Clearing and Paid Priority," Papers 2605.17425, arXiv.org.
    4. David Dai & Ruizhe Jia & Shihao Yu, 2026. "Settlement Manipulation in Prediction Markets," Papers 2606.31675, arXiv.org.
    5. Vijay Mohan, 2022. "Automated market makers and decentralized exchanges: a DeFi primer," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-48, December.
    6. Wen-Ting Wang, 2026. "Reinforcement Learning for Execution under Dynamic Fees in a Closed-Loop DEX Simulator," Papers 2607.10960, arXiv.org.
    7. Dian Yu & Jianjun Gao & Weiping Wu & Zizhuo Wang, 2022. "Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence Analysis," Papers 2205.08913, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    8. Harvey, Campbell R. & Hasbrouck, Joel & Saleh, Fahad, 2026. "Reprint of: The evolution of decentralized exchange: Risks, benefits, and oversight," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(7).
    9. Philippe Bergault & S'ebastien Bieber & Leandro S'anchez-Betancourt, 2025. "Optimal Exit Time for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers," Papers 2509.06510, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    10. Tuan Tran & Duc A. Tran, 2026. "An Automated Market Maker Algorithm for Fixed-Rate Trading with Flexible Maturities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 68(1), pages 401-435, July.
    11. Papakonstantinou, A. & Rogers, A & Gerding, E. H. & Jennings, N. R., 2010. "Mechanism Design for the truthful elicitation of costly probabilistic estimates in Distributed Information Systems," MPRA Paper 43324, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Daniele Maria Di Nosse & Fabrizio Lillo, 2026. "Mitigating Adverse Selection in Concentrated Liquidity AMMs with Dynamic Fees: An Agent-Based Model Approach," Papers 2606.23070, arXiv.org.
    13. Athos V. C. Carvalho & Douglas Silveira & Regis A. Ely & Daniel O. Cajueiro, 2023. "A logarithmic market scoring rule agent-based model to evaluate prediction markets," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1303-1343, September.
    14. Jianjun Gao & Zizhuo Wang & Weiping Wu & Dian Yu, 2025. "Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 157-177, January.
    15. Sascha Hägele, 2024. "Centralized exchanges vs. decentralized exchanges in cryptocurrency markets: A systematic literature review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Nam Anh Le, 2026. "Funding-Aware Optimal Market Making for Perpetual DEXs," Papers 2605.06405, arXiv.org.
    17. Cartea, Álvaro & Drissi, Fayçal & Monga, Marcello, 2025. "Decentralised finance and automated market making: Execution and speculation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    18. Carol Alexander & Xi Chen & Jun Deng & Qi Fu, 2025. "Price Discovery and Efficiency in Uniswap Liquidity Pools," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(8), pages 1023-1048, August.
    19. John R. Birge & Yifan Feng & N. Bora Keskin & Adam Schultz, 2021. "Dynamic Learning and Market Making in Spread Betting Markets with Informed Bettors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 1746-1766, November.
    20. Rafael Frongillo, 2022. "Quantum Information Elicitation," Papers 2203.07469, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.23915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.