IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v69y2023i11p6731-6751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Conceptual Flaws of Decentralized Automated Market Making

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Park

    (Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada)

Abstract

Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) are an essential component of the nascent decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. The most common DEXs are so-called automated market makers (AMMs): smart contracts that pool liquidity and process trades as atomic swaps of tokens. AMMs price transactions with a deterministic liquidity invariance rule that only uses the AMM’s token deposits as inputs and that has no precedent in traditional finance. Yet, in the context of transparent and open blockchain operations, any liquidity invariance pricing function allows so-called sandwich attacks (akin to front running) that increase the cost of trading and threaten the long-term viability of the DeFi ecosystem. Invariance pricing is also not regret free. Linear pricing rules have similar problems except for uniform pricing, which has regret-free prices and limits sandwich attack profits but which invites excessive order splitting. Comparing trading costs using a model of liquidity provision, constant product pricing is often cheaper except when the variance of the underlying asset is small or when the order is large.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Park, 2023. "The Conceptual Flaws of Decentralized Automated Market Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 6731-6751, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:11:p:6731-6751
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.02802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.02802
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2021.02802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:11:p:6731-6751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.