IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v69y2021i6p1746-1766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Learning and Market Making in Spread Betting Markets with Informed Bettors

Author

Listed:
  • John R. Birge

    (Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

  • Yifan Feng

    (National University of Singapore Business School, Singapore 119245)

  • N. Bora Keskin

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

  • Adam Schultz

    (Uber Technologies Inc, San Francisco, California 94103)

Abstract

We study the profit-maximization problem of a market maker in a spread betting market. In this market, the market maker quotes cutoff lines for the outcome of a certain future event as “prices,” and bettors bet on whether the event outcome exceeds the cutoff lines. Anonymous bettors with heterogeneous strategic behavior and information levels participate in the market. The market maker has limited information on the event outcome distribution, aiming to extract information from the market (i.e., “learning”) while guarding against an informed bettor’s strategic manipulation (i.e., “bluff-proofing”). We show that Bayesian policies that ignore bluffing are typically vulnerable to the informed bettor’s strategic manipulation, resulting in exceedingly large profit losses for the market maker as well as market inefficiency. We develop and analyze a novel family of policies, called inertial policies , that balance the trade-off between learning and bluff-proofing. We construct a simple instance of this family that (i) enables the market maker to achieve a near-optimal profit loss and (ii) eventually yields market efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • John R. Birge & Yifan Feng & N. Bora Keskin & Adam Schultz, 2021. "Dynamic Learning and Market Making in Spread Betting Markets with Informed Bettors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 1746-1766, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:69:y:2021:i:6:p:1746-1766
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2021.2109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2109
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2021.2109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:69:y:2021:i:6:p:1746-1766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.