IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/quedwp/274723.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Blockchain-based Settlement for Asset Trading

Author

Listed:
  • Chiu, Jonathan
  • Koeppl, Thorsten

Abstract

Can securities be settled on a blockchain and, if so, what are the gains relative to existing settlement systems? We consider a blockchain that ensures delivery-vs-payment by linking transfers of assets with payments and operates via a Proof-of-Work protocol. The main problem is to overcome settlement fails where participants fork the chain to get rid of trading losses. To deter forking, the blockchain needs to restrict block size and block time in order to generate sucient transaction fees which nance costly mining. We show that large enough trading volume, suciently strong preferences for fast settlement and limited trade size and risk are necessary conditions for blockchain-based settlement to be feasible. Despite mining being a deadweight cost, our estimates based on the market for US corporate debt show that gains from moving to faster and more exible settlement are in the range of 1-4 bps relative to existing legacy settlement systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiu, Jonathan & Koeppl, Thorsten, 2018. "Blockchain-based Settlement for Asset Trading," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 274723, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274723
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.274723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/274723/files/qed_wp_1397.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.274723?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.