IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.19846.html

Random Cap: Optimal Informationally Robust Delegation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiyuan Jia

Abstract

Are simple delegation rules optimal under ambiguity? We study delegation when the principal knows the mean, but not the distribution, of the agent's private information. In a parsimonious quadratic constant-bias environment, the robustly optimal randomized mechanism is a random cap: the principal draws and reveals an upper bound, below which the agent chooses freely. Randomization strictly outperforms every deterministic cap by hedging against cap-specific worst-case distributions. We characterize random caps through a nondecreasing and concave expected-action rule and construct the solution using a saddle-point approach. The worst-case distribution features an exponential survival function over its continuous region and an atom at the upper endpoint. Under regularity conditions, the result extends to convex-order ambiguity. Moreover, when the mean is below the agent's bias, an optimum can be implemented by supplementing the random cap with an incentive-neutral outcome lottery, while pure random caps are strictly suboptimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiyuan Jia, 2026. "Random Cap: Optimal Informationally Robust Delegation," Papers 2608.19846, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.19846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.19846
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.19846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.