IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.03616.html

Measuring the engine of a liquidation cascade: subcritical branching inside a first-order transition

Author

Listed:
  • Ramon Marc Garcia Seuma

Abstract

We study seven major crypto-perpetual liquidation cascades (2022-2025), and in the largest of them we can watch the mechanism directly. From the on-chain fill log of a fully transparent venue we measure the branching ratio of that event -- the October 2025 crash, the largest on record -- in flight, with both of its factors observed and no free constants. It ran deeply subcritical: the structural ratio and the amplification bookkeeping both place it at $\hat\lambda \approx 0.1-0.2$ throughout, while a third, flow-based estimator falls through the climax rather than rising. All three agree on subcriticality within the venue, not on a common numerical level. Alongside them, 88% of all post-onset forced selling landed within thirty minutes and 63% of it was absorbed off-book by the venue's backstop, which drives the branching ratio down precisely at the climax. Across the full set of seven, at onset -- the minute ending the steepest hour of each crash -- the order parameter (mean inter-asset coupling) jumps by between 1.6 and 4.4 baseline standard deviations into a near-fully-ordered phase, while the susceptibility proxy $\chi$ collapses in five of the seven events and diverges in none; the jump is invariant under subsampling. The transition is abrupt and scale-robust rather than critical, and its in-cascade signature lives in the liquidity sector: price impact spikes on two venues and two instruments while open interest clears by 25-70%. The natural mechanistic account, a Galton-Watson cascade with $\lambda = k \tilde\rho$, is then eliminated as a description of the pre-cascade state: both of its falsifiable predictions fail at simulated power >= 0.96, on proxied and on directly measured regressors alike. Severity is set by shock times map-in-path times liquidity withdrawal rather than by a diverging multiplier, which is why none of the scalar pre-state measures we can construct grades it.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramon Marc Garcia Seuma, 2026. "Measuring the engine of a liquidation cascade: subcritical branching inside a first-order transition," Papers 2608.03616, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.03616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.03616
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rama Cont & Lakshithe Wagalath, 2016. "Fire Sales Forensics: Measuring Endogenous Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 835-866, October.
    2. Stephen J. Hardiman & Nicolas Bercot & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2013. "Critical reflexivity in financial markets: a Hawkes process analysis," Papers 1302.1405, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    3. Ramon Marc Garcia Seuma, 2026. "Where does the criticality live? Early-warning signals are event-heterogeneous across seven crypto-perpetual liquidation cascades," Papers 2607.27070, arXiv.org.
    4. Kyle, Albert S, 1985. "Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1315-1335, November.
    5. Stephen Hardiman & Nicolas Bercot & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2013. "Critical reflexivity in financial markets: a Hawkes process analysis," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 86(10), pages 1-9, October.
    6. Stefan Thurner & J. Doyne Farmer & John Geanakoplos, 2012. "Leverage causes fat tails and clustered volatility," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(5), pages 695-707, February.
    7. Matthias Kirchner, 2017. "An estimation procedure for the Hawkes process," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 571-595, April.
    8. Jonathan Donier & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2015. "Why Do Markets Crash? Bitcoin Data Offers Unprecedented Insights," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Jonathan Donier & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2015. "Why Do Markets Crash? Bitcoin Data Offers Unprecedented Insights," Papers 1503.06704, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2015.
    10. Anders Johansen & Olivier Ledoit & Didier Sornette, 2000. "Crashes As Critical Points," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 219-255.
    11. Jonathan Donier & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2015. "Why Do Markets Crash? Bitcoin Data Offers Unprecedented Insights," Post-Print hal-01277584, HAL.
    12. Marten Scheffer & Jordi Bascompte & William A. Brock & Victor Brovkin & Stephen R. Carpenter & Vasilis Dakos & Hermann Held & Egbert H. van Nes & Max Rietkerk & George Sugihara, 2009. "Early-warning signals for critical transitions," Nature, Nature, vol. 461(7260), pages 53-59, September.
    13. Rama Cont & Lakshithe Wagalath, 2016. "Fire Sales Forensics: Measuring Endogenous Risk," Post-Print hal-03003955, HAL.
    14. Andr'es Garc'ia-Medina, 2026. "Iterative detection of global factors near the BBP phase transition," Papers 2607.06908, arXiv.org.
    15. Vishwesha Guttal & Srinivas Raghavendra & Nikunj Goel & Quentin Hoarau, 2016. "Lack of Critical Slowing Down Suggests that Financial Meltdowns Are Not Critical Transitions, yet Rising Variability Could Signal Systemic Risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Didier SORNETTE, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based Models," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 14-25, Swiss Finance Institute.
    2. Min Shu & Ruiqiang Song & Wei Zhu, 2021. "The 2021 Bitcoin Bubbles and Crashes—Detection and Classification," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Matthias Schnaubelt & Jonas Rende & Christopher Krauss, 2019. "Testing Stylized Facts of Bitcoin Limit Order Books," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, February.
    4. Christoph Aymanns & J. Doyne Farmer & Alissa M. Keinniejenhuis & Thom Wetzer, 2017. "Models of Financial Stability and their Application in Stress Tests," Working Papers on Finance 1805, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    5. Shu, Min & Zhu, Wei, 2020. "Real-time prediction of Bitcoin bubble crashes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 548(C).
    6. D. Sornette, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based models," Papers 1404.0243, arXiv.org.
    7. Ramon Marc Garcia Seuma, 2026. "Where does the criticality live? Early-warning signals are event-heterogeneous across seven crypto-perpetual liquidation cascades," Papers 2607.27070, arXiv.org.
    8. Christie Smith & Aaron Kumar, 2018. "Crypto‐Currencies – An Introduction To Not‐So‐Funny Moneys," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1531-1559, December.
    9. M. Eren Akbiyik & Mert Erkul & Killian Kaempf & Vaiva Vasiliauskaite & Nino Antulov-Fantulin, 2021. "Ask "Who", Not "What": Bitcoin Volatility Forecasting with Twitter Data," Papers 2110.14317, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    10. Thibault Jaisson, 2014. "Market impact as anticipation of the order flow imbalance," Papers 1402.1288, arXiv.org.
    11. Cerqueti, Roy & Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio & Nicolosi, Marco, 2021. "ESG investing: A chance to reduce systemic risk," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Corsi, Fulvio & Lillo, Fabrizio & Pirino, Davide & Trapin, Luca, 2018. "Measuring the propagation of financial distress with Granger-causality tail risk networks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 18-36.
    13. Bariviera, Aurelio F., 2017. "The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A dynamic approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1-4.
    14. Begušić, Stjepan & Kostanjčar, Zvonko & Eugene Stanley, H. & Podobnik, Boris, 2018. "Scaling properties of extreme price fluctuations in Bitcoin markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 400-406.
    15. Valentina Macchiati & Giuseppe Brandi & Tiziana Di Matteo & Daniela Paolotti & Guido Caldarelli & Giulio Cimini, 2022. "Systemic liquidity contagion in the European interbank market," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 17(2), pages 443-474, April.
    16. Lennart Ante, 2020. "A place next to Satoshi: foundations of blockchain and cryptocurrency research in business and economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1305-1333, August.
    17. Aslanidis, Nektarios & Bariviera, Aurelio F. & Savva, Christos S., 2024. "Do online attention and sentiment affect cryptocurrencies’ correlations?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    18. Zhang, Haoran, 2026. "Early warning of financial crises through critical field dynamics: A nonlocal trend-inhibition delay equation framework," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 682(C).
    19. Corbet, Shaen & Lucey, Brian & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2018. "Datestamping the Bitcoin and Ethereum bubbles," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 81-88.
    20. Steven Haryanto & Athor Subroto & Maria Ulpah, 2020. "Disposition effect and herding behavior in the cryptocurrency market," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(1), pages 115-132, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.03616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.