IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.18509.html

When Trade Produces Knowledge: Dynamic Pricing, Bilateral Learning, and Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Chupeng Xie

Abstract

A transaction can allocate a product and create information unavailable before consumption. We study dynamic pricing when a pricing agent and a buying agent hold different estimates of match value, traded outcomes update a public belief, and attributed extraction depreciates relationship capital. Public learning polarizes exchange: greater precision drives compatible delegated policies toward trade and incompatible policies toward rejection. The seller's exact expected profit must account for the fact that acceptance selects its posterior margin. Its optimal policy therefore tracks the public margin, trust distance, and posterior precision. Higher extraction reduces both current acceptance and the arrival of future outcome signals, producing a reference-respecting region and an extraction-learning trap. With unequal signal precision, the trading rule additionally selects common quality; a selection-naive learner can become more confident and less accurate. Transactions create an information externality for later participants, while a shared misspecified model can make the agents agree without becoming correct. The analysis distinguishes data production, Bayesian knowledge, relationship capital, and verified computation, and identifies the state and protocol records required to test the mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Chupeng Xie, 2026. "When Trade Produces Knowledge: Dynamic Pricing, Bilateral Learning, and Trust," Papers 2607.18509, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.18509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.18509
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Bergemann & Juuso Välimäki, 2000. "Experimentation in Markets," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 67(2), pages 213-234.
    2. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2023. "Data‐enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(4), pages 638-667, December.
    3. Sridhar Narayanan & Puneet Manchanda, 2009. "Heterogeneous Learning and the Targeting of Marketing Communication for New Products," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 424-441, 05-06.
    4. Ian N. Weaver & Vineet Kumar & Lalit Jain, 2025. "Nonparametric Pricing Bandits Leveraging Informational Externalities to Learn the Demand Curve," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 1299-1320, November.
    5. Eric T. Anderson & Duncan I. Simester, 2010. "Price Stickiness and Customer Antagonism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 125(2), pages 729-765.
    6. Ichihashi, Shota, 2021. "The economics of data externalities," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2004. "Consumer Learning, Brand Loyalty, and Competition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 134-145, December.
    8. Daria Dzyabura & John R. Hauser, 2019. "Recommending Products When Consumers Learn Their Preference Weights," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 417-441, May.
    9. Tülin Erdem & Michael P. Keane, 1996. "Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20.
    10. William J. Allender & Jura Liaukonyte & Sherif Nasser & Timothy J. Richards, 2021. "Price Fairness and Strategic Obfuscation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 122-146, January.
    11. Jean-Pierre Dubé & Sanjog Misra, 2023. "Personalized Pricing and Consumer Welfare," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(1), pages 131-189.
    12. Liying Qiu & Yan Huang & Param Vir Singh & Kannan Srinivasan, 2025. "Personalization, Consumer Search, and Algorithmic Pricing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 1278-1298, November.
    13. Arnoud V. den Boer & N. Bora Keskin, 2022. "Dynamic Pricing with Demand Learning and Reference Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7112-7130, October.
    14. Atalay Atasu & Dragos Florin Ciocan & Antoine Désir, 2024. "Price Delegation with Learning Agents," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(8), pages 5540-5556, August.
    15. Simon, Herbert A, 1979. "Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 493-513, September.
    16. Bergemann, Dirk & Valimaki, Juuso, 1996. "Learning and Strategic Pricing," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(5), pages 1125-1149, September.
    17. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard, 1986. "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 728-741, September.
    18. Arnoud V. den Boer & Bert Zwart, 2014. "Simultaneously Learning and Optimizing Using Controlled Variance Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 770-783, March.
    19. Juan Feng & Xin Li & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2019. "Online Product Reviews-Triggered Dynamic Pricing: Theory and Evidence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1107-1123, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chupeng Xie, 2026. "When Pricing Agents Meet Buying Agents: Personalized Pricing and Verifiable Trust," Papers 2607.16343, arXiv.org.
    2. Weng, Xi, 2015. "Dynamic pricing in the presence of individual learning," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 262-299.
    3. Tat Y. Chan & Jia Li & Lamar Pierce, 2014. "Learning from Peers: Knowledge Transfer and Sales Force Productivity Growth," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 463-484, July.
    4. Alexander Erlei & Mattheus Brenig & Nils Engelbrecht, 2024. "Consumer Behavior under Benevolent Price Discrimination," Papers 2404.03581, arXiv.org.
    5. Deni Mazrekaj & Mark D. Verhagen & Ajay Kumar & Daniel Muzio, 2025. "Does Price Personalization Ethically Outperform Unitary Pricing? A Thought Experiment and a Simulation Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 207-227, June.
    6. Tat Chan & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Ying Xie, 2013. "Treatment Effectiveness and Side Effects: A Model of Physician Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1309-1325, June.
    7. Zachary Mahone & Filippo Rebessi, 2019. "Consumer Learning and Firm Dynamics," Department of Economics Working Papers 2019-08, McMaster University.
    8. Snir, Avichai & Levy, Daniel & Levy, Dudi & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2025. "Price Gouging or Market Forces? Fairness Perceptions of Price Hikes during the Pandemic," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 0.
    9. Fernando Branco & Monic Sun & J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2012. "Optimal Search for Product Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(11), pages 2037-2056, November.
    10. Ali Goli & David H. Reiley & Hongkai Zhang, 2025. "Personalizing Ad Load to Optimize Subscription and Ad Revenues: Product Strategies Constructed from Experiments on Pandora," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 327-352, March.
    11. Tobias Gesche, 2022. "Reference‐price shifts and customer antagonism: Evidence from reviews for online auctions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 558-578, August.
    12. Philipp Kircher & Andrew Postlewaite, 2008. "Strategic Firms and Endogenous Consumer Emulation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 123(2), pages 621-661.
    13. Andreas Leibbrandt, 2016. "Behavioral Constraints on Pricing: Experimental Evidence on Price Discrimination and Customer Antagonism," CESifo Working Paper Series 6214, CESifo.
    14. Jie Bai, 2016. "Melons as Lemons: Asymmetric Information, Consumer Learning and Seller Reputation," Natural Field Experiments 00540, The Field Experiments Website.
    15. Nicolas Klein & Tymofiy Mylovanov, 2011. "Should the Flatterers be Avoided?," 2011 Meeting Papers 1273, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    16. Vishal Narayan & Vithala R. Rao & Carolyne Saunders, 2011. "How Peer Influence Affects Attribute Preferences: A Bayesian Updating Mechanism," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 368-384, 03-04.
    17. Moscarini, Giuseppe & Ottaviani, Marco, 2001. "Price Competition for an Informed Buyer," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 457-493, December.
    18. Kohei Kawaguchi, 2021. "When Will Workers Follow an Algorithm? A Field Experiment with a Retail Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1670-1695, March.
    19. Deni Mazreka & Mark D. Verhagen & Ajay Kumar & Daniel Muzio, 2025. "Does Price Personalization Ethically Outperform Unitary Pricing? : A Thought Experiment and a Simulation Study," Post-Print hal-04850420, HAL.
    20. Nicola Lacetera & Claudio A. Piga & Lorenzo Zirulia, 2025. "Sticky price for declining risk? Business strategies with “behavioral” customers in the hotel industry," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 250-273, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.18509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.