IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.18005.html

LLM Consumer Behavior Theory: Foundations of a Novel Research Field

Author

Listed:
  • Manon Reusens
  • Sofie Goethals
  • David Martens

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents that make consumption decisions on behalf of users. This shift raises fundamental questions for consumer theory, which has traditionally modeled humans as the primary decision-makers. In this paper, we introduce LLM Consumer Behavior Theory, a new field of study concerned with analyzing consumer behavior in agentic markets. Drawing on classical and behavioral economics alongside recent advances in Natural Language Processing, we formalize how human preferences are reflected and acted upon by LLM-based agents, and how agent-level decisions aggregate into market demand. We unify previously fragmented literature on LLM decision-making, human behavior simulation, and preference elicitation under a common economic lens, highlighting where assumptions, such as rationality and heterogeneity, may fail in agentic markets. Rather than providing empirical validation, this paper outlines the scope of LLM consumer behavior and identifies open research questions related to alignment, preference representation, and market dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Manon Reusens & Sofie Goethals & David Martens, 2026. "LLM Consumer Behavior Theory: Foundations of a Novel Research Field," Papers 2606.18005, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.18005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.18005
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiaxu Lou & Yifan Sun, 2026. "Anchoring bias in large language models: an experimental study," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Ali Goli & Amandeep Singh, 2024. "Frontiers: Can Large Language Models Capture Human Preferences?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 709-722, July.
    4. Berry, Steven & Levinsohn, James & Pakes, Ariel, 1995. "Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 841-890, July.
    5. Ilia Shumailov & Zakhar Shumaylov & Yiren Zhao & Nicolas Papernot & Ross Anderson & Yarin Gal, 2024. "AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data," Nature, Nature, vol. 631(8022), pages 755-759, July.
    6. Jeongbin Kim & Matthew Kovach & Kyu-Min Lee & Euncheol Shin & Hector Tzavellas, 2024. "Can an LLM Learn Preferences from Choice Data?," Papers 2401.07345, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    7. R. Maria del Rio-Chanona & Marco Pangallo & Cars Hommes, 2025. "Can Generative AI agents behave like humans? Evidence from laboratory market experiments," Papers 2505.07457, arXiv.org.
    8. Grossman, Sanford J & Hart, Oliver D, 1983. "An Analysis of the Principal-Agent Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 7-45, January.
    9. John J. Horton & Apostolos Filippas & Benjamin S. Manning, 2023. "Large Language Models as Simulated Economic Agents: What Can We Learn from Homo Silicus?," NBER Working Papers 31122, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongshen Sun & Juanjuan Zhang, 2025. "From Model Choice to Model Belief: Establishing a New Measure for LLM-Based Research," Papers 2512.23184, arXiv.org.
    2. Matthew O. Jackson & Qiaozhu Me & Stephanie W. Wang & Yutong Xie & Walter Yuan & Seth Benzell & Erik Brynjolfsson & Colin F. Camerer & James Evans & Brian Jabarian & Jon Kleinberg & Juanjuan Meng & Se, 2025. "AI Behavioral Science," Papers 2509.13323, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    3. Prieto, Marc & Caemmerer, Barbara & Baltas, George, 2015. "Using a hedonic price model to test prospect theory assertions: The asymmetrical and nonlinear effect of reliability on used car prices," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 206-212.
    4. Herweg, Fabian & Müller, Daniel, 2008. "The Optimality of Simple Contracts: Moral Hazard and Loss Aversion," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 17/2008, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    5. de Meza, David & Webb, David C., 2003. "Principal agent problems under loss aversion: an application to executive stock options," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24676, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Shu Wang & Zijun Yao & Shuhuai Zhang & Jianuo Gai & Tracy Xiao Liu & Songfa Zhong, 2025. "When Experimental Economics Meets Large Language Models: Evidence-based Tactics," Papers 2505.21371, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    7. Fabian Herweg & Daniel Muller & Philipp Weinschenk, 2010. "Binary Payment Schemes: Moral Hazard and Loss Aversion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(5), pages 2451-2477, December.
    8. Yuan Gao & Dokyun Lee & Gordon Burtch & Sina Fazelpour, 2024. "Take Caution in Using LLMs as Human Surrogates: Scylla Ex Machina," Papers 2410.19599, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    9. Pedro Amorim & Nicole DeHoratius & Fredrik Eng-Larsson & Sara Martins, 2024. "Customer Preferences for Delivery Service Attributes in Attended Home Delivery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7559-7578, November.
    10. Ryota IWAMOTO & Takunori ISHIHARA & Takanori IDA, 2026. "Comparing Risk Preferences and Reference Dependence in Humans and AI: A Persona-Based Approach with Fine-Tuning," Discussion papers e-25-006-v2, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    11. Jiaxin Liu & Yixuan Tang & Yi Yang & Kar Yan Tam, 2025. "Evaluating and Aligning Human Economic Risk Preferences in LLMs," Papers 2503.06646, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    12. George Gui & Seungwoo Kim, 2025. "Leveraging LLMs to Improve Experimental Design: A Generative Stratification Approach," Papers 2509.25709, arXiv.org.
    13. Casado, Esteban & Ferrer, Juan-Carlos, 2013. "Consumer price sensitivity in the retail industry: Latitude of acceptance with heterogeneous demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 418-426.
    14. Yonezawa, Koichi & Richards, Timothy J., 2016. "Competitive Package Size Decisions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 445-469.
    15. Filippo Gusella & Eugenio Vicario, 2025. "Generative Agents and Expectations: Do LLMs Align with Heterogeneous Agent Models?," Working Papers - Economics wp2025_18.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    16. Alekseenko, Iuliia & Dagaev, Dmitry & Paklina, Sofiia & Parshakov, Petr, 2025. "Strategizing with AI: Insights from a beauty contest experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    17. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    18. Ryuji Hashimoto & Takehiro Takayanagi & Masahiro Suzuki & Kiyoshi Izumi, 2026. "LLM agents reveal how human bias shapes path-dependent market dynamics," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Anne Lundgaard Hansen & Seung Jung Lee, 2025. "Financial Stability Implications of Generative AI: Taming the Animal Spirits," Papers 2510.01451, arXiv.org.
    20. Jingru Jia & Zehua Yuan & Junhao Pan & Paul E. McNamara & Deming Chen, 2024. "Decision-Making Behavior Evaluation Framework for LLMs under Uncertain Context," Papers 2406.05972, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.18005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.