IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.18138.html

Demographic Transition and the Dynamics of Income Distribution in Japan: A Bayesian State-Space Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuhiko Kakamu

Abstract

We develop a Bayesian state-space model for analyzing the dynamic evolution of income distributions using grouped income data. The model combines the generalized beta distribution of the second kind (GB2) with latent time-varying parameters to capture changes in the entire income distribution over time. Using Japanese household income data, we examine how demographic factors, particularly population aging and declining household size, affect inequality dynamics. The results show that demographic changes have heterogeneous effects across different parts of the income distribution and contribute substantially to the evolution of inequality. Counterfactual analyses indicate that aging and household size changes affect the lower and upper tails of the distribution differently. Because the proposed framework requires only grouped income data, it can be applied to countries where micro-level income data are unavailable.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuhiko Kakamu, 2026. "Demographic Transition and the Dynamics of Income Distribution in Japan: A Bayesian State-Space Approach," Papers 2605.18138, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.18138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.18138
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Christensen & Benjamin Connault, 2023. "Counterfactual Sensitivity and Robustness," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(1), pages 263-298, January.
    2. Chiaki Moriguchi & Emmanuel Saez, 2008. "The Evolution of Income Concentration in Japan, 1886-2005: Evidence from Income Tax Statistics," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(4), pages 713-734, November.
    3. Alisdair McKay & Christian K. Wolf, 2023. "What Can Time‐Series Regressions Tell Us About Policy Counterfactuals?," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(5), pages 1695-1725, September.
    4. Toshiaki Tachibanaki, 2005. "Confronting Income Inequality in Japan: A Comparative Analysis of Causes, Consequences, and Reform," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262201585, December.
    5. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández‐Val & Blaise Melly, 2013. "Inference on Counterfactual Distributions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(6), pages 2205-2268, November.
    6. DiNardo, John & Fortin, Nicole M & Lemieux, Thomas, 1996. "Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: A Semiparametric Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(5), pages 1001-1044, September.
    7. Nishino, Haruhisa & Kakamu, Kazuhiko, 2015. "A random walk stochastic volatility model for income inequality," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 21-28.
    8. Kazuhiko Kakamu & Haruhisa Nishino, 2019. "Bayesian Estimation of Beta-type Distribution Parameters Based on Grouped Data," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 625-645, August.
    9. Haruhisa Nishino & Kazuhiko Kakamu & Takashi Oga, 2012. "Bayesian estimation of Persistent Income Inequality using the Lognormal Stochastic Volatility Model," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 21(1), pages 88-101, March.
    10. Masini, Ricardo, 2025. "Distributional counterfactual analysis in high-dimensional setup," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PA).
    11. James B. McDonald, 2008. "Some Generalized Functions for the Size Distribution of Income," Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion, and Well-Being, in: Duangkamon Chotikapanich (ed.), Modeling Income Distributions and Lorenz Curves, chapter 3, pages 37-55, Springer.
    12. Stephen P. Jenkins, 2009. "Distributionally‐Sensitive Inequality Indices And The Gb2 Income Distribution," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 55(2), pages 392-398, June.
    13. Deaton, Angus & Paxson, Christina, 1994. "Intertemporal Choice and Inequality," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(3), pages 437-467, June.
    14. Genya Kobayashi & Yuta Yamauchi & Kazuhiko Kakamu & Yuki Kawakubo & Shonosuke Sugasawa, 2022. "Bayesian Approach to Lorenz Curve Using Time Series Grouped Data," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 897-912, April.
    15. Chib, Siddhartha & Ramamurthy, Srikanth, 2010. "Tailored randomized block MCMC methods with application to DSGE models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 19-38, March.
    16. Martin Feldkircher & Kazuhiko Kakamu, 2022. "How does monetary policy affect income inequality in Japan? Evidence from grouped data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2307-2327, May.
    17. Kazuhiko Kakamu, 2016. "Simulation Studies Comparing Dagum and Singh–Maddala Income Distributions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 48(4), pages 593-605, December.
    18. Jenkins, Stephen P., 2011. "Changing Fortunes: Income Mobility and Poverty Dynamics in Britain," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199226436.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuki Kawakubo & Kazuhiko Kakamu, 2025. "Multilevel Decomposition of Generalized Entropy Measures Using Constrained Bayes Estimation: An Application to Japanese Regional Data," Papers 2506.21213, arXiv.org.
    2. Philippe Van Kerm & Seunghee Yu & Chung Choe, 2016. "Decomposing quantile wage gaps: a conditional likelihood approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(4), pages 507-527, August.
    3. Masakatsu Okubo, 2015. "Earnings Dynamics and Profile Heterogeneity: Estimates from Japanese Panel Data," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 66(1), pages 112-146, March.
    4. Małgorzata Szczepaniak & Ewa Wędrowska & Joanna Muszyńska & Grzegorz Markowski, 2026. "Unequal by age and household type: income inequality and demographic aging in Central and Eastern Europe," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 1-34, March.
    5. Kazuhiko Kakamu, 2022. "Bayesian analysis of mixtures of lognormal distribution with an unknown number of components from grouped data," Papers 2210.05115, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    6. Tobias Eckernkemper & Bastian Gribisch, 2021. "Classical and Bayesian Inference for Income Distributions using Grouped Data," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(1), pages 32-65, February.
    7. Enrico Fabrizi & Maria Rosaria Ferrante & Carlo Trivisano, 2020. "A functional approach to small area estimation of the relative median poverty gap," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1273-1291, June.
    8. Richard Burkhauser & Shuaizhang Feng & Stephen Jenkins & Jeff Larrimore, 2011. "Estimating trends in US income inequality using the Current Population Survey: the importance of controlling for censoring," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(3), pages 393-415, September.
    9. Kazuhiko Kakamu & Haruhisa Nishino, 2019. "Bayesian Estimation of Beta-type Distribution Parameters Based on Grouped Data," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 625-645, August.
    10. Mihaela-Cătălina Anastasiade-Guinand & Alina Matei & Yves Tillé, 2023. "Gender wage difference estimation at quantile levels using sample survey data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(4), pages 1392-1433, December.
    11. Nishino, Haruhisa & Kakamu, Kazuhiko, 2015. "A random walk stochastic volatility model for income inequality," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 21-28.
    12. Sugasawa, Shonosuke & Kobayashi, Genya & Kawakubo, Yuki, 2020. "Estimation and inference for area-wise spatial income distributions from grouped data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Sloczynski, Tymon, 2013. "Population Average Gender Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 7315, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Mathias Silva, 2023. "Parametric models of income distributions integrating misreporting and non-response mechanisms," AMSE Working Papers 2311, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    15. Hajargasht, Gholamreza & Griffiths, William E., 2013. "Pareto–lognormal distributions: Inequality, poverty, and estimation from grouped income data," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 593-604.
    16. Michał Brzeziński, 2013. "Parametric Modelling of Income Distribution in Central and Eastern Europe," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 5(3), pages 207-230, September.
    17. Sungchul Park & Anirban Basu, 2018. "Alternative evaluation metrics for risk adjustment methods," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 984-1010, June.
    18. Nao Sudo & Michio Suzuki & Tomoaki Yamada, 2012. "Inequalities in Japanese Economy during the Lost Decades," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-856, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    19. Yannick Kalantzis & Ryo Kambayashi & Sébastien Lechevalier, 2012. "Wage and Productivity Differentials in Japan: The Role of Labor Market Mechanisms," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 26(4), pages 514-541, December.
    20. Jose Maria Sarabia & Francisco Azpitarte, 2012. "On the relationship between objective and subjective inequality indices and the natural rate of subjective inequality," Working Papers 248, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.18138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.