IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.20271.html

Information Propagation Across Investor Types: Transfer Entropy Networks in the Korean Equity Market

Author

Listed:
  • Sungwoo Kang

Abstract

Whether heterogeneous investor flows transmit private information across stocks or merely reflect coordinated responses to public signals remains an open question in market microstructure. We construct Transfer Entropy (TE) networks from investor-type flows -- foreign, institutional, and individual -- for \numNStocks{} Korean equities over \numNDates{} trading days (January 2020 to February 2025), and evaluate their economic content through interaction information (II), conditional TE, mutual information (MI), Kelly criterion bounds, and Fama-MacBeth regressions. Three findings emerge. First, TE networks are sparse and structurally heterogeneous: foreign investors maintain few but strong links (\numEdgesFor{} edges, mean TE = \numMeanTEFor{}), while individual investors form many but weak links (\numEdgesInd{} edges, mean TE = \numMeanTEInd{}). Second, cross-investor information is redundant rather than synergistic, no investor type directionally dominates another, and MI between signals and returns is zero at the daily horizon. Third, network centrality adds negligible alpha in cross-sectional regressions, with only one of six signal-centrality interactions reaching marginal significance. These results indicate that the observed propagation structure captures shared information processing rather than private signal cascades, consistent with daily-frequency market efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Sungwoo Kang, 2026. "Information Propagation Across Investor Types: Transfer Entropy Networks in the Korean Equity Market," Papers 2603.20271, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.20271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20271
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimpfl Thomas & Peter Franziska Julia, 2013. "Using transfer entropy to measure information flows between financial markets," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 85-102, February.
    2. R. Mantegna, 1999. "Hierarchical structure in financial markets," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 193-197, September.
    3. Hyuk Choe & Bong-Chan Kho & René M. Stulz, 2005. "Do Domestic Investors Have an Edge? The Trading Experience of Foreign Investors in Korea," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 795-829.
    4. Kyle, Albert S, 1985. "Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1315-1335, November.
    5. Grossman, Sanford J & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1980. "On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 393-408, June.
    6. Billio, Monica & Getmansky, Mila & Lo, Andrew W. & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2012. "Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 535-559.
    7. Sensoy, Ahmet & Sobaci, Cihat & Sensoy, Sadri & Alali, Fatih, 2014. "Effective transfer entropy approach to information flow between exchange rates and stock markets," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 180-185.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kathleen Weiss Hanley & Gerard Hoberg, 2019. "Dynamic Interpretation of Emerging Risks in the Financial Sector," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(12), pages 4543-4603.
    2. Tran, Ly Thi Hai & Hoang, Thao Thi Phuong & Tran, Hoa Xuan, 2018. "Stock liquidity and ownership structure during and after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis: Empirical evidence from an emerging market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 114-133.
    3. Chen, Yanhua & Pantelous, Athanasios A., 2022. "The U.S.-China trade conflict impacts on the Chinese and U.S. stock markets: A network-based approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    4. Lee, Jieun & Ryu, Doojin, 2019. "How does FX liquidity affect the relationship between foreign ownership and stock liquidity?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 101-119.
    5. Badhani, K.N. & Kumar, Ashish & Vo, Xuan Vinh & Tayde, Mangesh, 2023. "Do institutional investors perform better in emerging markets?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1041-1056.
    6. Leonidas Sandoval Junior & Asher Mullokandov & Dror Y. Kenett, 2015. "Dependency Relations among International Stock Market Indices," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-39, May.
    7. Kyoung‐Hun Bae & Peter Dixon, 2018. "Do investors use options and futures to trade on different types of information? Evidence from an aggregate stock index," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 175-198, February.
    8. repec:wyi:journl:002166 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Chen, Haiqiang & Choi, Paul Moon Sub, 2012. "Does information vault Niagara Falls? Cross-listed trading in New York and Toronto," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 175-199.
    10. Theo Diamandis & Yonathan Murin & Andrea Goldsmith, 2018. "Ranking Causal Influence of Financial Markets via Directed Information Graphs," Papers 1801.06896, arXiv.org.
    11. Jieun Lee, 2018. "Who Improves or Worsens Liquidity in the Korean Treasury Bond Market?," Working Papers 2018-3, Economic Research Institute, Bank of Korea.
    12. Yue Zhao & Difang Wan, 2018. "Institutional high frequency trading and price discovery: Evidence from an emerging commodity futures market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 243-270, February.
    13. Xianfeng Jiang & Yongdong Shi, 2006. "The Impact of Insider Trading on the Secondary Market with Order-Driven System," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 7(1), pages 129-143, May.
    14. Guillermo Llorente & Jiang Wang, 2020. "Trading and information in futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(8), pages 1231-1263, August.
    15. AltInkIlIç, Oya & Hansen, Robert S., 2009. "On the information role of stock recommendation revisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 17-36, October.
    16. Sebastiano Michele Zema & Giorgio Fagiolo & Tiziano Squartini & Diego Garlaschelli, 2025. "Mesoscopic structure of the stock market and portfolio optimization," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 20(2), pages 307-333, April.
    17. Fernandes, Marcelo & Mergulhão, João, 2016. "Anticipatory effects in the FTSE 100 index revisions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 79-90.
    18. Jacob Gyntelberg & Mico Loretan & Tientip Subhanij & Eric Chan, 2010. "Private information, stock markets, and exchange rates," BIS Papers chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), The international financial crisis and policy challenges in Asia and the Pacific, volume 52, pages 186-210, Bank for International Settlements.
    19. Jonathan A. Batten & Igor Lončarski & Peter G. Szilagyi, 2018. "When Kamay Met Hill: Organisational Ethics in Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 779-792, February.
    20. Lan, Hairong & Wang, Liukai & Li, Mengting & Xiong, Yu & Li, Yuqing, 2025. "Network centrality, diversification, and portfolio returns: Economic insights from blockchain industry," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    21. Greenwood, Robin, 2005. "Short- and long-term demand curves for stocks: theory and evidence on the dynamics of arbitrage," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 607-649, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.20271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.