IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.19663.html

The impact of class imbalance in logistic regression models for low-default portfolios in credit risk

Author

Listed:
  • Willem D. Schutte
  • Charl Pretorius
  • Neill Smit
  • Leandra van der Merwe
  • Robert Maxwell

Abstract

In this paper, we study how class imbalance, typical of low-default credit portfolios, affects the performance of logistic regression models. Using a simulation study with controlled data-generating mechanisms, we vary (i) the level of class imbalance and (ii) the strength of association between the predictors and the response. The results show that, for a given strength of association, achievable classification accuracy deteriorates markedly as the event rate decreases, and the optimal classification cut-off shifts with the level of imbalance. In contrast, the Gini coefficient is comparatively stable with respect to class imbalance once sample sizes are sufficiently large, even when classification accuracy is strongly affected. As a practical guideline, we summarise attainable classification performance as a function of the event rate and strength of association between the predictors and the response.

Suggested Citation

  • Willem D. Schutte & Charl Pretorius & Neill Smit & Leandra van der Merwe & Robert Maxwell, 2026. "The impact of class imbalance in logistic regression models for low-default portfolios in credit risk," Papers 2602.19663, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.19663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.19663
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.19663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.