IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.12782.html

Empirical Validation of a Dual-Defense Mechanism Reshaping Wholesale Electricity Price Dynamics in Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Huang Zhenyu
  • Yuan Zhao

Abstract

While ex-ante screening and static price caps are global standards for mitigating price volatility, Singapore's electricity market employs a unique dual-defense mechanism integrating vesting contracts (VC) with a temporary price cap (TPC). Using high-frequency data from 2021 to 2024, this paper evaluates this mechanism and yields three primary findings. First, a structural trade-off exists within the VC framework: while VC quantity (VCQ) suppresses average prices, it paradoxically exacerbates instability via liquidity squeezes. Conversely, VC price (VCP) functions as a tail-risk anchor, dominating at extreme quantiles where VCQ efficacy wanes. Second, a structural break around the 2023 reform reveals a fundamental re-mapping of price dynamics; the previously positive pass-through from offer ratios to clearing prices was largely neutralized post-reform. Furthermore, diagnostics near the TPC threshold show no systematic evidence of strategic bid shading, confirming the TPC's operational integrity. Third, the dual-defense mechanism exhibits a critical synergy that resolves the volatility trade-off. The TPC reverses the volatility penalty of high VCQ, shifting the elasticity of conditional volatility from a destabilizing 0.636 to a stabilizing -0.213. This synergy enables the framework to enhance tail-risk control while eliminating liquidity-related stability costs. We conclude that this dual-defense mechanism successfully decouples price suppression from liquidity risks, thereby maximizing market stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang Zhenyu & Yuan Zhao, 2026. "Empirical Validation of a Dual-Defense Mechanism Reshaping Wholesale Electricity Price Dynamics in Singapore," Papers 2602.12782, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.12782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.12782
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Youngho, 2007. "The New Electricity Market of Singapore: Regulatory framework, market power and competition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 403-412, January.
    2. Loi, Tian Sheng Allan & Jindal, Gautam, 2019. "Electricity market deregulation in Singapore – Initial assessment of wholesale prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1-10.
    3. repec:aen:journl:dn-se-a03 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Olmstead, Derek E.H. & Yatchew, Adonis, 2025. "Alberta's electricity futures market: An empirical analysis of price formation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. repec:aen:eeepjl:2_2_a03 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Flottmann, Jonty & Simshauser, Paul & Wild, Phillip & Todorova, Neda, 2025. "The forward market dilemma in energy-only electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Qu Feng & Shihao Zhou, 2023. "Electricity Market Liberalization And Efficiency: Evidence From Singapore," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 68(03), pages 651-669, June.
    8. Wolak, Frank A., 2003. "Diagnosing the California Electricity Crisis," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 11-37.
    9. Paul L. Joskow, 2008. "Lessons Learned From Electricity Market Liberalization," The Energy Journal, , vol. 29(2_suppl), pages 9-42, December.
    10. Natalia Fabra & Imelda, 2023. "Market Power and Price Exposure: Learning from Changes in Renewable Energy Regulation," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 323-358, November.
    11. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Uz, Dilek, 2026. "Monetary policy shocks and day-ahead electricity markets: Insights from a “bizarre policy experiment”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    12. Ding, Wenfu & Wang, Lingzhi & Tian, Gaoliang, 2026. "Electricity spot market reform and overcapacity in fossil-fired power firms: A quasi-natural experiment based on China power market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 209(PA).
    13. Frank Wolak, 2000. "An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Hedge Contracts on Bidding Behavior in a Competitive Electricity Market," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 1-39.
    14. Hassani, Hossein & Rua, António & Silva, Emmanuel Sirimal & Thomakos, Dimitrios, 2019. "Monthly forecasting of GDP with mixed-frequency multivariate singular spectrum analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1263-1272.
    15. Ciarreta, Aitor & Damoun, Anas & Espinosa, Maria Paz, 2025. "A restructured Moroccan electricity market and its interaction with the Iberian power market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    16. Kee, Edward D., 2001. "Vesting Contracts: A Tool for Electricity Market Transition," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 11-22, July.
    17. Fabra, Natalia, 2023. "Reforming European electricity markets: Lessons from the energy crisis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    18. Newbery, David M., 2002. "Problems of liberalising the electricity industry," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4-5), pages 919-927, May.
    19. De Blauwe, Jilles & Zhang, Xiaobing & Keles, Dogan, 2025. "Investigating empirical bidding curves in the electricity spot market: Expected patterns vs anomalies?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    20. Steve Cicala, 2022. "Imperfect Markets versus Imperfect Regulation in US Electricity Generation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(2), pages 409-441, February.
    21. Flottmann, Jonty & Wild, Phillip & Todorova, Neda, 2024. "Derivatives and hedging practices in the Australian National Electricity Market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Simshauser, 2025. "Are gas turbines 'bankable' in transitioning energy-only markets?," Working Papers EPRG2601, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    2. Loi, Tian Sheng Allan & Jindal, Gautam, 2019. "Electricity market deregulation in Singapore – Initial assessment of wholesale prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Abuouf, Sarah & Elshurafa, Amro M., 2025. "Is the single-buyer model a barrier to clean energy deployment? Empirical evidence on decarbonization and renewable energy supply in emerging and developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Jordi Brandts & Paul Pezanis-Christou & Arthur Schram, 2008. "Competition with forward contracts: a laboratory analysis motivated by electricity market design," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(525), pages 192-214, January.
    5. Frank A. Wolak, 2011. "Managing Demand-Side Economic and Political Constraints on Electricity Industry Re-structuring Processes," RSCAS Working Papers 2011/61, European University Institute.
    6. Paul Simshauser, 2026. "Coordinating coal plant closures: transient strategic reserves in transitioning energy-only markets," Working Papers EPRG2605, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    7. Johanndeiter, Silke & Bertsch, Valentin, 2024. "Bidding zero? An analysis of solar power plants’ price bids in the electricity day-ahead market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    8. Lebeau, Alexis & Petitet, Marie & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2024. "Long-term issues with the Energy-Only Market design in the context of deep decarbonization," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Nicola Comincioli & Mattia Guerini & Sergio Vergalli, 2024. "Carbon Taxation and Electricity Price Dynamics: Empirical Evidence from the Australian Market," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(12), pages 3131-3161, December.
    10. Natalia Fabra & Clément Leblanc & Mateus Souza, 2025. "Unpacking the Distributional Implications of the Energy Crisis: Lessons from the Iberian Electricity Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 12093, CESifo.
    11. Abuzayed, A., 2025. "From Model Optimality to Market Reality: Do Electricity Markets Support Renewable Investments?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2558, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    12. Gallego, Camilo A., 2025. "Economic effects in wholesale electricity markets from endogenous long-term forward contracts indexed to spot conditions," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Joseph Collins & Andreas Amann & Kieran Mulchrone, 2025. "Speculators and Price Inertia in a Day-Ahead Electricity Market: An Irish Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-26, September.
    14. Mayer, Klaus & Trück, Stefan, 2018. "Electricity markets around the world," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 77-100.
    15. Anas Abuzayed, 2025. "From model optimality to market reality: do electricity markets support renewable investments?," Working Papers EPRG2521, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    16. Zhang, Liang & Ruan, Jian & Ding, Jianhua, 2014. "The institutional power shortage in China: Capacity shortage or capacity under-utilisation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 480-494.
    17. Ciarreta, Aitor & Nasirov, Shahriyar & Silva, Carlos, 2016. "The development of market power in the Spanish power generation sector: Perspectives after market liberalization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 700-710.
    18. Paul Simshauser, 2026. "Coordinating coal plant closures: transient strategic reserves in transitioning energy-only markets," Working Papers EPRG2605, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    19. Lo Prete, Chiara & Palmer, Karen & Robertson, Molly, 2025. "Time for a market upgrade? A review of wholesale electricity market designs for the future," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Wolak, Frank A., 2010. "Using restructured electricity supply industries to understand oligopoly industry outcomes," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 227-246, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.12782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.