IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2510.27384.html

On effects of present-bias on carbon emission patterns towards a net zero target

Author

Listed:
  • Hansjorg Albrecher
  • Jinxia Zhu

Abstract

This paper explores the optimal policy for using an allocated carbon emission budget over time with the objective to maximize profit, by explicitly taking into account present-biased preferences of decision-makers, accounting for time-inconsistent preferences. The setup can be adapted to be applicable for either a (present-biased) individual or also for a company which seeks a balance between production and emission schedules. In particular, we use and extend stochastic control techniques developed for optimal dividend strategies in insurance risk theory for the present purpose. The approach enables a quantitative analysis to assess the effects of present-bias, of sustainability awareness, and the efficiency of a potential carbon tax in a simplified model. In some numerical implementations, we illustrate in what way a higher degree of present-bias leads to excess emission patterns, while placing greater emphasis on sustainability reduces carbon emissions. Furthermore, we show that for low levels of carbon tax, its increase has a positive effect on curbing emissions, while beyond a certain threshold that marginal impact gets considerably weaker.

Suggested Citation

  • Hansjorg Albrecher & Jinxia Zhu, 2025. "On effects of present-bias on carbon emission patterns towards a net zero target," Papers 2510.27384, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.27384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.27384
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Harris & David Laibson, 2013. "Instantaneous Gratification," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(1), pages 205-248.
    2. Chen, Shumin & Li, Zhongfei & Zeng, Yan, 2014. "Optimal dividend strategies with time-inconsistent preferences," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 150-172.
    3. Borissov, Kirill & Bretschger, Lucas, 2022. "Optimal carbon policies in a dynamic heterogeneous world," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Terrence Iverson & Larry Karp, 2021. "Carbon Taxes and Climate Commitment with Non-constant Time Preference," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(2), pages 764-799.
    5. Eisenberg, Julia, 2015. "Optimal dividends under a stochastic interest rate," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 259-266.
    6. Hans Gerber & Elias Shiu, 1998. "On the Time Value of Ruin," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 48-72.
    7. Laibson, David, 1998. "Life-cycle consumption and hyperbolic discount functions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3-5), pages 861-871, May.
    8. Jinxia Zhu, 2015. "Dividend optimization for general diffusions with restricted dividend payment rates," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2015(7), pages 592-615, October.
    9. Chen, Shumin & Wang, Xi & Deng, Yinglu & Zeng, Yan, 2016. "Optimal dividend-financing strategies in a dual risk model with time-inconsistent preferences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 27-37.
    10. A. Max Reppen & Jean‐Charles Rochet & H. Mete Soner, 2020. "Optimal dividend policies with random profitability," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 228-259, January.
    11. Yongwu Li & Zhongfei Li & Yan Zeng, 2016. "Equilibrium Dividend Strategy with Non-exponential Discounting in a Dual Model," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 699-722, February.
    12. William Nordhaus, 2018. "Evolution of modeling of the economics of global warming: changes in the DICE model, 1992–2017," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 623-640, June.
    13. Zhao, Qian & Wei, Jiaqin & Wang, Rongming, 2014. "On dividend strategies with non-exponential discounting," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Shane Frederick & George Loewenstein & Ted O'Donoghue, 2002. "Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 351-401, June.
    15. Josef Anton Strini & Stefan Thonhauser, 2023. "Time-inconsistent view on a dividend problem with penalty," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2023(8), pages 811-833, September.
    16. Thonhauser, Stefan & Albrecher, Hansjorg, 2007. "Dividend maximization under consideration of the time value of ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 163-184, July.
    17. Maskin, Eric & Tirole, Jean, 2001. "Markov Perfect Equilibrium: I. Observable Actions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 191-219, October.
    18. MacKenzie, Ian A. & Ohndorf, Markus, 2012. "Cap-and-trade, taxes, and distributional conflict," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 51-65.
    19. Grenadier, Steven R. & Wang, Neng, 2007. "Investment under uncertainty and time-inconsistent preferences," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 2-39, April.
    20. C. V. Pao, 1992. "Nonlinear Parabolic and Elliptic Equations," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-1-4615-3034-3, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Shumin & Zeng, Yan & Hao, Zhifeng, 2017. "Optimal dividend strategies with time-inconsistent preferences and transaction costs in the Cramér–Lundberg model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 31-45.
    2. Sang Hu & Zihan Zhou, 2025. "Equilibrium Policy on Dividend and Capital Injection under Time-inconsistent Preferences," Papers 2505.23511, arXiv.org.
    3. Soren Christensen & Kristoffer Lindensjo, 2019. "Moment constrained optimal dividends: precommitment \& consistent planning," Papers 1909.10749, arXiv.org.
    4. Zhu, Jinxia & Siu, Tak Kuen & Yang, Hailiang, 2020. "Singular dividend optimization for a linear diffusion model with time-inconsistent preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 66-80.
    5. Shou Chen & Richard Fu & Lei Wedge & Ziran Zou, 2019. "Non-hyperbolic discounting and dynamic preference reversal," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 283-302, March.
    6. Chen, Shumin & Wang, Xi & Deng, Yinglu & Zeng, Yan, 2016. "Optimal dividend-financing strategies in a dual risk model with time-inconsistent preferences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 27-37.
    7. Shigeta, Yuki, 2022. "Quasi-hyperbolic discounting under recursive utility and consumption–investment decisions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    8. Li, Jiangyuan & Liu, Bo & Yang, Jinqiang & Zou, Zhentao, 2020. "Hedge fund’s dynamic leverage decisions under time-inconsistent preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 779-791.
    9. Liu, Bo & Mu, Congming & Yang, Jinqiang, 2017. "Dynamic agency and investment theory with time-inconsistent preferences," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 88-95.
    10. Chen, Shumin & Luo, Dan & Yao, Haixiang, 2024. "Optimal investor life cycle decisions with time-inconsistent preferences," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Guo, Qian-Wen & Chen, Shumin & Schonfeld, Paul & Li, Zhongfei, 2018. "How time-inconsistent preferences affect investment timing for rail transit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 172-192.
    12. Tyson, Christopher J., 2008. "Management of a capital stock by Strotz's naive planner," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 2214-2239, July.
    13. Chen, Shumin & Li, Zhongfei & Zeng, Yan, 2014. "Optimal dividend strategies with time-inconsistent preferences," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 150-172.
    14. Aleksandar Arandjelovi'c & Julia Eisenberg, 2024. "Optimal risk mitigation by deep reinsurance," Papers 2408.06168, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    15. li, Hong & Mu, Congming & Yang, Jinqiang, 2016. "Optimal contract theory with time-inconsistent preferences," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 519-530.
    16. Timothy Hillman & Nan Zhang & Zhuo Jin, 2018. "Real-Option Valuation in a Finite-Time, Incomplete Market with Jump Diffusion and Investor-Utility Inflation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Yanzhao Li & Ju'e Guo & Yongwu Li & Xu Zhang, 2021. "Optimal exit decision of venture capital under time-inconsistent preferences," Papers 2103.11557, arXiv.org.
    18. Ebert, Sebastian & Wei, Wei & Zhou, Xun Yu, 2020. "Weighted discounting—On group diversity, time-inconsistency, and consequences for investment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Choi, Yoonseok, 2020. "Macroeconomic implications of dynamically inconsistent preferences," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 267-279.
    20. Xue Dong He & Xun Yu Zhou, 2021. "Who Are I: Time Inconsistency and Intrapersonal Conflict and Reconciliation," Papers 2105.01829, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.27384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.