IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2412.15083.html

Can They Compete? Cost Competitiveness of Non-Light-Water Reactors for Heat and Power Supply in a Decarbonized European Energy System

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Wimmers
  • Fanny Bose
  • Leonard Goke

Abstract

Recent pledges to triple global nuclear capacity by 2050 suggest a "nuclear renaissance," bolstered by unconventional reactor concepts such as sodium-cooled fast reactors, high-temperature reactors, and molten salt reactors. These technologies claim to address the challenges of today's high-capacity light-water reactors, i.e., cost overruns, delays, and social acceptance, while also offering additional non-electrical applications. However, this analysis reveals that none of these concepts currently meet the prerequisites of affordability, competitiveness, or commercial availability. Our cost analysis reveals optimistic FOAK cost assumptions of 5,623 to 9,511 USD per kW, and NOAK cost projections as low as 1,476 USD per kW. At FOAK cost, the applied energy system model for Europe in 2040 includes no nuclear power capacity, and thus indicates that significant cost reductions would be required for these technologies to contribute to energy system decarbonization. In lower-cost scenarios, reactors capable of producing high and medium temperature heat compete with other technologies and dominate the system once costs fall below 5,000 USD per kW. Electricity shares reach current levels of approx. 20% once costs are reduced to 3,000 USD per kW or less We conclude that, for reactor capacities to increase significantly, a focus on certain technology lines and streamlined regulation in necessary. Further remaining technological challenges, e.g., new waste streams, must be resolved.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Wimmers & Fanny Bose & Leonard Goke, 2024. "Can They Compete? Cost Competitiveness of Non-Light-Water Reactors for Heat and Power Supply in a Decarbonized European Energy System," Papers 2412.15083, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.15083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15083
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dupré la Tour, Marie-Alix, 2023. "Photovoltaic and wind energy potential in Europe – A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Wealer, B. & Bauer, S. & Hirschhausen, C.v. & Kemfert, C. & Göke, L., 2021. "Investing into third generation nuclear power plants - Review of recent trends and analysis of future investments using Monte Carlo Simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    3. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Gilbert, Alex & Nugent, Daniel, 2014. "Risk, innovation, electricity infrastructure and construction cost overruns: Testing six hypotheses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 906-917.
    4. Sawicki Łukasz & Horbaczewska Bożena, 2021. "Role of the state in implementation of strategic investment projects: The SaHo Model for nuclear power," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 57(4), pages 343-359, December.
    5. Bärenbold, Rebekka & Bah, Muhammad Maladoh & Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Steigerwald, Björn & von Hirschhausen, Christian & Wealer, Ben & Weigt, Hannes & Wimmers, Alexander, 2024. "Decommissioning of commercial nuclear power plants: Insights from a multiple-case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Göke, Leonard & Weibezahn, Jens & Kendziorski, Mario, 2023. "How flexible electrification can integrate fluctuating renewables," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    7. Karakosta, Charikleia & Pappas, Charalampos & Marinakis, Vangelis & Psarras, John, 2013. "Renewable energy and nuclear power towards sustainable development: Characteristics and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 187-197.
    8. Steigerwald, Björn & Weibezahn, Jens & Slowik, Martin & von Hirschhausen, Christian, 2023. "Uncertainties in estimating production costs of future nuclear technologies: A model-based analysis of small modular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lopez, Gabriel & Pourjamal, Yousef & Breyer, Christian, 2025. "Paving the way towards a sustainable future or lagging behind? An ex-post analysis of the International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Weibezahn, Jens & Steigerwald, Björn, 2024. "Fission for funds: The financing of nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Wen, Xin & Contreras, Julia Gonzalez & Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle & Sasse, Jan-Philipp & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2025. "High sensitivity to methodological choices when integrating social acceptance data in electricity system modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 402(PA).
    4. Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon & Solomon, A.A. & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Aghahosseini, Arman & Mensah, Theophilus Nii Odai & Ram, Manish & Breyer, Christian, 2021. "Just transition towards defossilised energy systems for developing economies: A case study of Ethiopia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 346-365.
    5. Athanasios Ioannis Arvanitidis & Vivek Agarwal & Miltiadis Alamaniotis, 2023. "Nuclear-Driven Integrated Energy Systems: A State-of-the-Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Backhaus, Klaus & Gausling, Philipp & Hildebrand, Luise, 2015. "Comparing the incomparable: Lessons to be learned from models evaluating the feasibility of Desertec," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 905-913.
    7. Fang, Xingming & Wang, Lu & Sun, Chuanwang & Zheng, Xuemei & Wei, Jing, 2021. "Gap between words and actions: Empirical study on consistency of residents supporting renewable energy development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    8. Liao, Haoyang & Zhao, Fulong & Qin, Aoxiang & Chen, Baowen & Tan, Sichao & Gao, Puzhen & Tian, Ruifeng, 2025. "Design and characteristics analysis of various residual heat removal schemes and shutdown control strategies for helium-xenon cooled reactor system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    9. Tournier, Olympe & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2024. "Maintaining reliability in a 100% decarbonized power sector: The interrelated role of flexible resources," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Liu, Chunyu & Zheng, Xinrui & Yang, Haibin & Tang, Waiching & Sang, Guochen & Cui, Hongzhi, 2023. "Techno-economic evaluation of energy storage systems for concentrated solar power plants using the Monte Carlo method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    11. Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2023. "Long-term optimization of the hydrogen-electricity nexus in France: Green, blue, or pink hydrogen?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    12. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Walter, Götz, 2018. "Major hydropower states, sustainable development, and energy security: Insights from a preliminary cross-comparative assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1074-1082.
    13. Burgherr, Peter & Hirschberg, Stefan, 2014. "Comparative risk assessment of severe accidents in the energy sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(S1), pages 45-56.
    14. Chong, Yih Tng & Teo, Kwong Meng & Tang, Loon Ching, 2016. "A lifecycle-based sustainability indicator framework for waste-to-energy systems and a proposed metric of sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 797-809.
    15. Islam, Muhammad Tanveer ul & Harillo, Alex & Pereira, Miguel Alves, 2025. "Prioritising municipal photovoltaic initiatives using multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Barner, Lukas, 2024. "A multi-commodity partial equilibrium model of imperfect competition in future global hydrogen markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    17. Atienza-Márquez, Antonio & Oi, Shota & Araki, Takuto & Mitsushima, Shigenori, 2024. "Water transport across the membrane of a direct toluene electro-hydrogenation electrolyzer: Experiments and modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    18. Brookes, Naomi J. & Locatelli, Giorgio, 2015. "Power plants as megaprojects: Using empirics to shape policy, planning, and construction management," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 57-66.
    19. Dana Laureen Laband & Martin Stöckl & Annedore Mittreiter & Uwe Holzhammer, 2025. "Barrier Analysis of Flexibilization of Cooling Supply Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-33, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.15083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.