IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2401.08251.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A techno-economic model for avoiding conflicts of interest between owners of offshore wind farms and maintenance suppliers

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Pliego Marug'an
  • Fausto Pedro Garc'ia M'arquez
  • Jes'us Mar'ia Pinar P'erez

Abstract

Currently, wind energy is one of the most important sources of renewable energy. Offshore locations for wind turbines are increasingly exploited because of their numerous advantages. However, offshore wind farms require high investment in maintenance service. Due to its complexity and special requirements, maintenance service is usually outsourced by wind farm owners. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to determine, quantify, and reduce the possible conflicts of interest between owners and maintenance suppliers. We created a complete techno-economic model to address this problem from an impartial point of view. An iterative process was developed to obtain statistical results that can help stakeholders negotiate the terms of the contract, in which the availability of the wind farm is the reference parameter by which to determine penalisations and incentives. Moreover, a multi-objective programming problem was addressed that maximises the profits of both parties without losing the alignment of their interests. The main scientific contribution of this paper is the maintenance analysis of offshore wind farms from two perspectives: that of the owner and the maintenance supplier. This analysis evaluates the conflicts of interest of both parties. In addition, we demonstrate that proper adjustment of some parameters, such as penalisation, incentives, and resources, and adequate control of availability can help reduce this conflict of interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Pliego Marug'an & Fausto Pedro Garc'ia M'arquez & Jes'us Mar'ia Pinar P'erez, 2024. "A techno-economic model for avoiding conflicts of interest between owners of offshore wind farms and maintenance suppliers," Papers 2401.08251, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2401.08251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.08251
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Chen & Gao, Wei & Yang, Tao & Guo, Sheng, 2019. "Opportunistic maintenance strategy for wind turbines considering weather conditions and spare parts inventory management," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 703-711.
    2. Jose A. Guajardo & Morris A. Cohen & Sang-Hyun Kim & Serguei Netessine, 2012. "Impact of Performance-Based Contracting on Product Reliability: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 961-979, May.
    3. Christiansen, Marielle & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Nygreen, Bjørn & Ronen, David, 2013. "Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 467-483.
    4. Irawan, Chandra Ade & Ouelhadj, Djamila & Jones, Dylan & Stålhane, Magnus & Sperstad, Iver Bakken, 2017. "Optimisation of maintenance routing and scheduling for offshore wind farms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 76-89.
    5. Benjamin Loevinsohn, 2008. "Performance-Based Contracting for Health Services in Developing Countries : A Toolkit," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6481, December.
    6. Dahl, Christian M. & Effraimidis, Georgios & Pedersen, Mikkel H., 2019. "Nonparametric wind power forecasting under fixed and random censoring," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Tautz-Weinert, Jannis & Yürüşen, Nurseda Y. & Melero, Julio J. & Watson, Simon J., 2019. "Sensitivity study of a wind farm maintenance decision - A performance and revenue analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 93-105.
    8. Zhang, Zijun & Kusiak, Andrew & Song, Zhe, 2013. "Scheduling electric power production at a wind farm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 227-238.
    9. Wang, Jingjing & Zhao, Xian & Guo, Xiaoxin, 2019. "Optimizing wind turbine's maintenance policies under performance-based contract," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 626-634.
    10. Taylor, James W. & Jeon, Jooyoung, 2018. "Probabilistic forecasting of wave height for offshore wind turbine maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 877-890.
    11. Yürüşen, Nurseda Y. & Rowley, Paul N. & Watson, Simon J. & Melero, Julio J., 2020. "Automated wind turbine maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Kostas Selviaridis & Finn Wynstra, 2015. "Performance-based contracting: a literature review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(12), pages 3505-3540, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pliego Marugán, Alberto & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Pinar Pérez, Jesús María, 2022. "A techno-economic model for avoiding conflicts of interest between owners of offshore wind farms and maintenance suppliers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Yürüşen, Nurseda Y. & Rowley, Paul N. & Watson, Simon J. & Melero, Julio J., 2020. "Automated wind turbine maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Zhang, Chen & Hu, Di & Yang, Tao, 2022. "Anomaly detection and diagnosis for wind turbines using long short-term memory-based stacked denoising autoencoders and XGBoost," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Ren, Zhengru & Verma, Amrit Shankar & Li, Ye & Teuwen, Julie J.E. & Jiang, Zhiyu, 2021. "Offshore wind turbine operations and maintenance: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Shuo-Yan Chou & Xuan Loc Pham & Thi Anh Tuyet Nguyen & Tiffany Hui-Kuang Yu, 2023. "Optimal maintenance planning with special emphasis on deterioration process and vessel routing for offshore wind systems," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(4), pages 739-763, June.
    6. Ge, Qianru & Peng, Hao & van Houtum, Geert-Jan & Adan, Ivo, 2018. "Reliability optimization for series systems under uncertain component failure rates in the design phase," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 163-175.
    7. Nullmeier, Fabian & Wynstra, Finn & van der Valk, Wendy, 2019. "Mitigating shirking: Contracting performance in buyer-initiated service triads," Other publications TiSEM cebcb590-5a85-4906-b8ec-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Qin, Xuwei & Shao, Lusheng & Jiang, Zhong-Zhong, 2020. "Contract design for equipment after-sales service with business interruption insurance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 176-187.
    9. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Maintenance optimization in industry 4.0," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    10. He, Rui & Tian, Zhigang & Wang, Yifei & Zuo, Mingjian & Guo, Ziwei, 2023. "Condition-based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems considering prognostic information and degraded working efficiency," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    11. Ravi Pandit & Davide Astolfi & Anh Minh Tang & David Infield, 2022. "Sequential Data-Driven Long-Term Weather Forecasting Models’ Performance Comparison for Improving Offshore Operation and Maintenance Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Xiaodong Li & Xiang Song & Djamila Ouelhadj, 2023. "A Cost Optimisation Model for Maintenance Planning in Offshore Wind Farms with Wind Speed Dependent Failure Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Korkeamäki, Lauri & Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit, 2021. "Worth the risk? The profit impact of outcome-based service offerings for manufacturing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 92-102.
    14. Gilbert, Ciaran & Browell, Jethro & McMillan, David, 2021. "Probabilistic access forecasting for improved offshore operations," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 134-150.
    15. Nguyen, Thi-Anh-Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2022. "Developing an exhaustive optimal maintenance schedule for offshore wind turbines based on risk-assessment, technical factors and cost-effective evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    16. Grubic, Tonci & Jennions, Ian, 2018. "Do outcome-based contracts exist? The investigation of power-by-the-hour and similar result-oriented cases," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 209-219.
    17. Rahimi-Ghahroodi, S. & Al Hanbali, A. & Zijm, W.H.M. & Timmer, J.B., 2019. "Emergency supply contracts for a service provider with limited local resources," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 445-460.
    18. Zheng, Rui & Zhou, Yifan, 2021. "Comparison of three preventive maintenance warranty policies for products deteriorating with age and a time-varying covariate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Neha Sharma & Sripad K. Devalkar & Milind G. Sohoni, 2021. "Payment for Results: Funding Non‐Profit Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1686-1702, June.
    20. Stålhane, Magnus & Halvorsen-Weare, Elin E. & Nonås, Lars Magne & Pantuso, Giovanni, 2019. "Optimizing vessel fleet size and mix to support maintenance operations at offshore wind farms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 495-509.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2401.08251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.