IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2310.14590.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can the Black Lives Matter Movement Reduce Racial Disparities? Evidence from Medical Crowdfunding

Author

Listed:
  • Kaixin Liu
  • Jiwei Zhou
  • Junda Wang

Abstract

Using high-frequency donation records from a major medical crowdfunding site and careful difference-in-difference analysis, we demonstrate that the 2020 BLM surge decreased the fundraising gap between Black and non-Black beneficiaries by around 50\%. The reduction is largely attributed to non-Black donors. Those beneficiaries in counties with moderate BLM activities were most impacted. We construct innovative instrumental variable approaches that utilize weekends and rainfall to identify the global and local effects of BLM protests. Results suggest a broad social movement has a greater influence on charitable-giving behavior than a local event. Social media significantly magnifies the impact of protests.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaixin Liu & Jiwei Zhou & Junda Wang, 2023. "Can the Black Lives Matter Movement Reduce Racial Disparities? Evidence from Medical Crowdfunding," Papers 2310.14590, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2310.14590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.14590
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Younkin & Venkat Kuppuswamy, 2018. "The Colorblind Crowd? Founder Race and Performance in Crowdfunding," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3269-3287, July.
    2. Michael Bailey & Rachel Cao & Theresa Kuchler & Johannes Stroebel & Arlene Wong, 2018. "Social Connectedness: Measurement, Determinants, and Effects," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(3), pages 259-280, Summer.
    3. Saharsh Agarwal & Ananya Sen, 2022. "Antiracist Curriculum and Digital Platforms: Evidence from Black Lives Matter," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2932-2948, April.
    4. Buchmueller, T.C. & Levinson, Z.M. & Levy, H.G. & Wolfe, B.L., 2016. "Effect of the affordable care act on racial and ethnic disparities in health insurance coverage," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(8), pages 1416-1421.
    5. Jenq, Christina & Pan, Jessica & Theseira, Walter, 2015. "Beauty, weight, and skin color in charitable giving," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 234-253.
    6. Rebecca A. Maynard & Kenneth A. Couch & Coady Wing & Thomas D. Cook, 2013. "Strengthening The Regression Discontinuity Design Using Additional Design Elements: A Within‐Study Comparison," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 853-877, September.
    7. Adam Chilton & Jonathan Masur & Kyle Rozema, 2020. "Political Ideology and the Law Review Selection Process," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 211-240.
    8. Hong Luo & Laurina Zhang, 2022. "Scandal, Social Movement, and Change: Evidence from #MeToo in Hollywood," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1278-1296, February.
    9. Ruqaiijah Yearby, 2018. "Racial Disparities in Health Status and Access to Healthcare: The Continuation of Inequality in the United States Due to Structural Racism," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(3-4), pages 1113-1152, May.
    10. Andreas Madestam & Daniel Shoag & Stan Veuger & David Yanagizawa-Drott, 2013. "Do Political Protests Matter? Evidence from the Tea Party Movement," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(4), pages 1633-1685.
    11. Oliver Engist & Felix Schafmeister, 2022. "Do political protests mobilize voters? Evidence from the Black Lives Matter protests," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 293-313, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan Athey & Dean Karlan & Emil Palikot & Yuan Yuan, 2022. "Smiles in Profiles: Improving Efficiency While Reducing Disparities in Online Marketplaces," Papers 2209.01235, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    2. Freitas-Monteiro, Teresa & Prömel, Christopher, 2024. "Local far-right demonstrations and nationwide public attitudes towards migration," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Miller,Amisha & Lall,Saurabh A. & Goldstein,Markus P. & Montalvao Machado,Joao H. C., 2023. "Asking Better Questions : The Effect of Changing Investment Organizations’ Evaluation Practices on Gender Disparities in Funding Innovation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10625, The World Bank.
    4. Chaim Letwin & Michael P. Ciuchta & Michael Johnson & Regan Stevenson & Cameron Ford, 2024. "Passion and attractiveness on display: an examination of gender bias in crowdfunding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 165-192, June.
    5. Klepsch, Markus, 2023. "Do birds of a feather always flock together? A multidimensional examination of homophily in crowdfunding," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(1), pages 237-269.
    6. Freitas Monteiro, Teresa & Prömel, Christopher, 2024. "Local far-right demonstrations and nationwide public attitudes toward migration," Discussion Papers 2024/3, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    7. Saharsh Agarwal & Ananya Sen, 2022. "Antiracist Curriculum and Digital Platforms: Evidence from Black Lives Matter," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2932-2948, April.
    8. Seigner, Benedikt David Christian & Milanov, Hana, 2023. "Mirror, mirror—A gendered lens on female entrepreneurs’ facial attractiveness in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    9. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    10. Theresa Kuchler & Monika Piazzesi & Johannes Stroebel, 2022. "Housing Market Expectations," CESifo Working Paper Series 9665, CESifo.
    11. Priyanga Gunarathne & Huaxia Rui & Abraham Seidmann, 2022. "Racial Bias in Customer Service: Evidence from Twitter," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 43-54, March.
    12. Marco Manacorda & Andrea Tesei, 2020. "Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 533-567, March.
    13. repec:osf:osfxxx:5xerm_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Goran Calic & Moren Lévesque & Anton Shevchenko, 2024. "On why women-owned businesses take more time to secure microloans," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 917-938, October.
    15. Diemer, Andreas & Regan, Tanner, 2022. "No inventor is an island: Social connectedness and the geography of knowledge flows in the US," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    16. Bittner, Christian & Fecht, Falko & Pala, Melissa & Saidi, Farzad, 2022. "Information transmission between banks and the market for corporate control," Discussion Papers 29/2022, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    17. Bryan K. Stroube & David M. Waguespack, 2024. "Status and consensus: Heterogeneity in audience evaluations of female‐ versus male‐lead films," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 994-1024, May.
    18. Chen, Daniel L. & Levonyan, Vardges & Yeh, Susan, 2016. "Policies Affect Preferences: Evidence from Random Variation in Abortion Jurisprudence," IAST Working Papers 16-58, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    19. Josh Angrist & David Autor & Sally Hudson & Amanda Pallais, 2015. "Evaluating Econometric Evaluations of Post-Secondary Aid," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 502-507, May.
    20. Taha Movahedi, 2020. "Group Uncertainty and Social Preferences," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2020-07, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
    21. Cantarella, Michele & Strozzi, Chiara, 2019. "Workers in the Crowd: The Labour Market Impact of the Online Platform Economy," IZA Discussion Papers 12327, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2310.14590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.