IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2012.12550.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Invidious Comparisons: Ranking and Selection as Compound Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaying Gu
  • Roger Koenker

Abstract

There is an innate human tendency, one might call it the "league table mentality," to construct rankings. Schools, hospitals, sports teams, movies, and myriad other objects are ranked even though their inherent multi-dimensionality would suggest that -- at best -- only partial orderings were possible. We consider a large class of elementary ranking problems in which we observe noisy, scalar measurements of merit for $n$ objects of potentially heterogeneous precision and are asked to select a group of the objects that are "most meritorious." The problem is naturally formulated in the compound decision framework of Robbins's (1956) empirical Bayes theory, but it also exhibits close connections to the recent literature on multiple testing. The nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for mixture models (Kiefer and Wolfowitz (1956)) is employed to construct optimal ranking and selection rules. Performance of the rules is evaluated in simulations and an application to ranking U.S kidney dialysis centers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2020. "Invidious Comparisons: Ranking and Selection as Compound Decisions," Papers 2012.12550, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2012.12550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.12550
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenguang Sun & Alexander C. McLain, 2012. "Multiple Testing of Composite Null Hypotheses in Heteroscedastic Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(498), pages 673-687, June.
    2. Magne Mogstad & Joseph P. Romano & Azeem Shaikh & Daniel Wilhelm, 2020. "Inference for Ranks with Applications to Mobility across Neighborhoods and Academic Achievement across Countries," NBER Working Papers 26883, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Sun, Wenguang & Cai, T. Tony, 2007. "Oracle and Adaptive Compound Decision Rules for False Discovery Rate Control," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 901-912, September.
    4. Athey, Susan & Imbens, Guido W. & Metzger, Jonas & Munro, Evan, 2024. "Using Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks for the design of Monte Carlo simulations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(2).
    5. Vaart,A. W. van der, 2000. "Asymptotic Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784504.
    6. Roger Koenker & Ivan Mizera, 2014. "Convex Optimization, Shape Constraints, Compound Decisions, and Empirical Bayes Rules," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(506), pages 674-685, June.
    7. Raj Chetty & Nathaniel Hendren & Patrick Kline & Emmanuel Saez, 2014. "Where is the land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(4), pages 1553-1623.
    8. Nicholas C. Henderson & Michael A. Newton, 2016. "Making the cut: improved ranking and selection for large-scale inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(4), pages 781-804, September.
    9. Hanushek, Eric A., 2011. "The economic value of higher teacher quality," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 466-479, June.
    10. Pallavi Basu & T. Tony Cai & Kiranmoy Das & Wenguang Sun, 2018. "Weighted False Discovery Rate Control in Large-Scale Multiple Testing," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1172-1183, July.
    11. Christopher Genovese & Larry Wasserman, 2002. "Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 499-517, August.
    12. John D. Storey, 2002. "A direct approach to false discovery rates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 479-498, August.
    13. Raj Chetty & Nathaniel Hendren, 2018. "The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility II: County-Level Estimates," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(3), pages 1163-1228.
    14. Bradley Efron, 2016. "Empirical Bayes deconvolution estimates," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(1), pages 1-20.
    15. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2017. "Rebayes: an R package for empirical bayes mixture methods," CeMMAP working papers CWP37/17, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    16. Michael Gilraine & Jiaying Gu & Robert McMillan, 2020. "A New Method for Estimating Teacher Value-Added," NBER Working Papers 27094, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Schmidt, Klaus D., 2014. "On inequalities for moments and the covariance of monotone functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 91-95.
    18. Hongyuan Cao & Wenguang Sun & Michael R. Kosorok, 2013. "The optimal power puzzle: scrutiny of the monotone likelihood ratio assumption in multiple testing," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 100(2), pages 495-502.
    19. Portnoy, Stephen, 1982. "Maximizing the probability of correctly ordering random variables using linear predictors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 256-269, June.
    20. Koenker, Roger & Mizera, Ivan, 2014. "Convex Optimization in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 60(i05).
    21. Harvey Goldstein & David J. Spiegelhalter, 1996. "League Tables and Their Limitations: Statistical Issues in Comparisons of Institutional Performance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 159(3), pages 385-409, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magne Mogstad & Joseph P. Romano & Azeem M. Shaikh & Daniel Wilhelm, 2023. "A Comment on: “Invidious Comparisons: Ranking and Selection as Compound Decisions” by Jiaying Gu and Roger Koenker," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(1), pages 53-60, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2023. "Invidious Comparisons: Ranking and Selection as Compound Decisions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(1), pages 1-41, January.
    2. T. Tony Cai & Wenguang Sun & Weinan Wang, 2019. "Covariate‐assisted ranking and screening for large‐scale two‐sample inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 187-234, April.
    3. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2016. "On a Problem of Robbins," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 224-244, August.
    4. Timothy B. Armstrong & Michal Kolesár & Mikkel Plagborg‐Møller, 2022. "Robust Empirical Bayes Confidence Intervals," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(6), pages 2567-2602, November.
    5. Cipolli III, William & Hanson, Timothy & McLain, Alexander C., 2016. "Bayesian nonparametric multiple testing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 64-79.
    6. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2017. "Rebayes: an R package for empirical bayes mixture methods," CeMMAP working papers 37/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    7. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2017. "Rebayes: an R package for empirical bayes mixture methods," CeMMAP working papers CWP37/17, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Timothy B. Armstrong & Michal Koles'ar & Mikkel Plagborg-M{o}ller, 2020. "Robust Empirical Bayes Confidence Intervals," Papers 2004.03448, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    9. Magne Mogstad & Joseph P. Romano & Azeem Shaikh & Daniel Wilhelm, 2020. "Inference for Ranks with Applications to Mobility across Neighborhoods and Academic Achievement across Countries," NBER Working Papers 26883, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Gómez-Villegas Miguel A. & Sanz Luis & Salazar Isabel, 2014. "A Bayesian decision procedure for testing multiple hypotheses in DNA microarray experiments," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 49-65, February.
    11. Joshua Habiger & David Watts & Michael Anderson, 2017. "Multiple testing with heterogeneous multinomial distributions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 562-570, June.
    12. Jo Blanden & Matthias Doepke & Jan Stuhler, 2022. "Education inequality," CEP Discussion Papers dp1849, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    13. Zhigen Zhao, 2022. "Where to find needles in a haystack?," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(1), pages 148-174, March.
    14. Izmirlian, Grant, 2020. "Strong consistency and asymptotic normality for quantities related to the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate procedure," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. Li Tan & Cory Koedel, 2019. "The Effects of Differential Income Replacement and Mortality on U.S. Social Security Redistribution," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 613-637, October.
    16. T. Tony Cai & Wenguang Sun, 2017. "Optimal screening and discovery of sparse signals with applications to multistage high throughput studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 197-223, January.
    17. Roger Koenker, 2017. "Bayesian deconvolution: an R vinaigrette," CeMMAP working papers 38/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    18. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2018. "Nonparametric maximum likelihood methods for binary response models with random coefficients," Papers 1811.03329, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2020.
    19. Stéphane Bonhomme & Martin Weidner, 2019. "Posterior average effects," CeMMAP working papers CWP43/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    20. Roger Koenker, 2017. "Bayesian deconvolution: an R vinaigrette," CeMMAP working papers CWP38/17, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2012.12550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.