IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Multiple Testing of Composite Null Hypotheses in Heteroscedastic Models

Listed author(s):
  • Wenguang Sun
  • Alexander C. McLain
Registered author(s):

    In large-scale studies, the true effect sizes often range continuously from zero to small to large, and are observed with heteroscedastic errors. In practical situations where the failure to reject small deviations from the null is inconsequential, specifying an indifference region (or forming composite null hypotheses) can greatly reduce the number of unimportant discoveries in multiple testing. The heteroscedasticity issue poses new challenges for multiple testing with composite nulls. In particular, the conventional framework in multiple testing, which involves rescaling or standardization, is likely to distort the scientific question. We propose the concept of a composite null distribution for heteroscedastic models and develop an optimal testing procedure that minimizes the false nondiscovery rate, subject to a constraint on the false discovery rate. The proposed approach is different from conventional methods in that the effect size, statistical significance, and multiplicity issues are addressed integrally. The external information of heteroscedastic errors is incorporated for optimal simultaneous inference. The new features and advantages of our approach are demonstrated using both simulated and real data. The numerical studies demonstrate that our new procedure enjoys superior performance with greater accuracy and better interpretability of results.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Journal of the American Statistical Association.

    Volume (Year): 107 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 498 (June)
    Pages: 673-687

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:498:p:673-687
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.664505
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:498:p:673-687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.