IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1901.03478.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Deep Learning for Ranking Response Surfaces with Applications to Optimal Stopping Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Ruimeng Hu

Abstract

In this paper, we propose deep learning algorithms for ranking response surfaces, with applications to optimal stopping problems in financial mathematics. The problem of ranking response surfaces is motivated by estimating optimal feedback policy maps in stochastic control problems, aiming to efficiently find the index associated to the minimal response across the entire continuous input space $\mathcal{X} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$. By considering points in $\mathcal{X}$ as pixels and indices of the minimal surfaces as labels, we recast the problem as an image segmentation problem, which assigns a label to every pixel in an image such that pixels with the same label share certain characteristics. This provides an alternative method for efficiently solving the problem instead of using sequential design in our previous work [R. Hu and M. Ludkovski, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 5 (2017), 212--239]. Deep learning algorithms are scalable, parallel and model-free, i.e., no parametric assumptions needed on the response surfaces. Considering ranking response surfaces as image segmentation allows one to use a broad class of deep neural networks, e.g., UNet, SegNet, DeconvNet, which have been widely applied and numerically proved to possess high accuracy in the field. We also systematically study the dependence of deep learning algorithms on the input data generated on uniform grids or by sequential design sampling, and observe that the performance of deep learning is {\it not} sensitive to the noise and locations (close to/away from boundaries) of training data. We present a few examples including synthetic ones and the Bermudan option pricing problem to show the efficiency and accuracy of this method.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruimeng Hu, 2019. "Deep Learning for Ranking Response Surfaces with Applications to Optimal Stopping Problems," Papers 1901.03478, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1901.03478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.03478
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leif Andersen & Mark Broadie, 2004. "Primal-Dual Simulation Algorithm for Pricing Multidimensional American Options," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1222-1234, September.
    2. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    3. Carriere, Jacques F., 1996. "Valuation of the early-exercise price for options using simulations and nonparametric regression," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 19-30, December.
    4. Gilles Stoltz & Sébastien Bubeck & Rémi Munos, 2011. "Pure exploration in finitely-armed and continuous-armed bandits," Post-Print hal-00609550, HAL.
    5. Sébastien Bubeck & Rémi Munos & Gilles Stoltz & Csaba Szepesvari, 2011. "X-Armed Bandits," Post-Print hal-00450235, HAL.
    6. Mark Broadie & Menghui Cao, 2008. "Improved lower and upper bound algorithms for pricing American options by simulation," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(8), pages 845-861.
    7. Daniel Merl & Leah R Johnson & Robert B Gramacy & Marc Mangel, 2009. "A Statistical Framework for the Adaptive Management of Epidemiological Interventions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-9, June.
    8. Roustant, Olivier & Ginsbourger, David & Deville, Yves, 2012. "DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R Packages for the Analysis of Computer Experiments by Kriging-Based Metamodeling and Optimization," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 51(i01).
    9. Taddy, Matthew A. & Gramacy, Robert B. & Polson, Nicholas G., 2011. "Dynamic Trees for Learning and Design," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 109-123.
    10. N. Meinshausen & B. M. Hambly, 2004. "Monte Carlo Methods For The Valuation Of Multiple‐Exercise Options," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(4), pages 557-583, October.
    11. Pascal L�tourneau & Lars Stentoft, 2014. "Refining the least squares Monte Carlo method by imposing structure," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 495-507, March.
    12. Guoming Lai & Mulan X. Wang & Sunder Kekre & Alan Scheller-Wolf & Nicola Secomandi, 2011. "Valuation of Storage at a Liquefied Natural Gas Terminal," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 602-616, June.
    13. Denis Belomestny, 2011. "Pricing Bermudan options by nonparametric regression: optimal rates of convergence for lower estimates," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 655-683, December.
    14. Jain, Shashi & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2015. "The Stochastic Grid Bundling Method: Efficient pricing of Bermudan options and their Greeks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 412-431.
    15. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiequn Han & Ruimeng Hu & Jihao Long, 2020. "Convergence of Deep Fictitious Play for Stochastic Differential Games," Papers 2008.05519, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    2. Jie Chen & Lingfei Li, 2021. "Data-driven Hedging of Stock Index Options via Deep Learning," Papers 2111.03477, arXiv.org.
    3. Xuwei Yang & Anastasis Kratsios & Florian Krach & Matheus Grasselli & Aurelien Lucchi, 2023. "Regret-Optimal Federated Transfer Learning for Kernel Regression with Applications in American Option Pricing," Papers 2309.04557, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Wei & Zhu, Dan, 2022. "Generic improvements to least squares monte carlo methods with applications to optimal stopping problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 1132-1144.
    2. Mike Ludkovski, 2020. "mlOSP: Towards a Unified Implementation of Regression Monte Carlo Algorithms," Papers 2012.00729, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    3. Sebastian Becker & Patrick Cheridito & Arnulf Jentzen & Timo Welti, 2019. "Solving high-dimensional optimal stopping problems using deep learning," Papers 1908.01602, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    4. Vikranth Lokeshwar & Vikram Bhardawaj & Shashi Jain, 2019. "Neural network for pricing and universal static hedging of contingent claims," Papers 1911.11362, arXiv.org.
    5. Sebastian Becker & Patrick Cheridito & Arnulf Jentzen, 2020. "Pricing and Hedging American-Style Options with Deep Learning," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Ivan Guo & Nicolas Langren'e & Jiahao Wu, 2023. "Simultaneous upper and lower bounds of American option prices with hedging via neural networks," Papers 2302.12439, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    7. Andersson, Kristoffer & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2021. "A deep learning approach for computations of exposure profiles for high-dimensional Bermudan options," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 408(C).
    8. Pascal Létourneau & Lars Stentoft, 2019. "Bootstrapping the Early Exercise Boundary in the Least-Squares Monte Carlo Method," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Fabozzi, Frank J. & Paletta, Tommaso & Tunaru, Radu, 2017. "An improved least squares Monte Carlo valuation method based on heteroscedasticity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 698-706.
    10. Andersson, Kristoffer & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2021. "Deep learning for CVA computations of large portfolios of financial derivatives," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 409(C).
    11. Mark S. Joshi, 2016. "Analysing the bias in the primal-dual upper bound method for early exercisable derivatives: bounds, estimation and removal," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 519-533, April.
    12. Nadarajah, Selvaprabu & Margot, François & Secomandi, Nicola, 2017. "Comparison of least squares Monte Carlo methods with applications to energy real options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 196-204.
    13. Maximilian Mair & Jan Maruhn, 2013. "On the primal-dual algorithm for callable Bermudan options," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 79-110, April.
    14. Juri Hinz & Tanya Tarnopolskaya & Jeremy Yee, 2020. "Efficient algorithms of pathwise dynamic programming for decision optimization in mining operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 583-615, March.
    15. Jain, Shashi & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2015. "The Stochastic Grid Bundling Method: Efficient pricing of Bermudan options and their Greeks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 412-431.
    16. Denis Belomestny & John Schoenmakers & Fabian Dickmann, 2013. "Multilevel dual approach for pricing American style derivatives," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 717-742, October.
    17. Patrik Karlsson & Shashi Jain & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2016. "Fast and accurate exercise policies for Bermudan swaptions in the LIBOR market model," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(01), pages 1-22, March.
    18. R. Mark Reesor & T. James Marshall, 2020. "Forest of Stochastic Trees: A Method for Valuing Multiple Exercise Options," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, May.
    19. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    20. Dong, Wenfeng & Kang, Boda, 2019. "Analysis of a multiple year gas sales agreement with make-up, carry-forward and indexation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 76-96.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1901.03478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.