IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1508.02973.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the Effect of Bias Estimation on Coverage Accuracy in Nonparametric Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Calonico
  • Matias D. Cattaneo
  • Max H. Farrell

Abstract

Nonparametric methods play a central role in modern empirical work. While they provide inference procedures that are more robust to parametric misspecification bias, they may be quite sensitive to tuning parameter choices. We study the effects of bias correction on confidence interval coverage in the context of kernel density and local polynomial regression estimation, and prove that bias correction can be preferred to undersmoothing for minimizing coverage error and increasing robustness to tuning parameter choice. This is achieved using a novel, yet simple, Studentization, which leads to a new way of constructing kernel-based bias-corrected confidence intervals. In addition, for practical cases, we derive coverage error optimal bandwidths and discuss easy-to-implement bandwidth selectors. For interior points, we show that the MSE-optimal bandwidth for the original point estimator (before bias correction) delivers the fastest coverage error decay rate after bias correction when second-order (equivalent) kernels are employed, but is otherwise suboptimal because it is too "large". Finally, for odd-degree local polynomial regression, we show that, as with point estimation, coverage error adapts to boundary points automatically when appropriate Studentization is used; however, the MSE-optimal bandwidth for the original point estimator is suboptimal. All the results are established using valid Edgeworth expansions and illustrated with simulated data. Our findings have important consequences for empirical work as they indicate that bias-corrected confidence intervals, coupled with appropriate standard errors, have smaller coverage error and are less sensitive to tuning parameter choices in practically relevant cases where additional smoothness is available.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Calonico & Matias D. Cattaneo & Max H. Farrell, 2015. "On the Effect of Bias Estimation on Coverage Accuracy in Nonparametric Inference," Papers 1508.02973, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1508.02973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1508.02973
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susanne M. Schennach, 2015. "A bias bound approach to nonparametric inference," CeMMAP working papers CWP71/15, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. Matias D. Cattaneo & Richard K. Crump & Michael Jansson, 2013. "Generalized Jackknife Estimators of Weighted Average Derivatives," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(504), pages 1243-1256, December.
    3. Peter Hall & Joel L. Horowitz, 2013. "A simple bootstrap method for constructing nonparametric confidence bands for functions," CeMMAP working papers CWP29/13, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pietro Bonaldi & Mauricio Villamizar-Villegas, 2018. "An Auction-Based Test of Private Information in an Interdealer FX Market," Working papers 1, Red Investigadores de Economía.
    2. De Benedetto, Marco Alberto, 2018. "Quality of Politicians and Electoral System. Evidence from a Quasi-experimental Design for Italian Cities," MPRA Paper 89511, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Niklas Potrafke & Felix Roesel, 2019. "The urban-rural gap in health care infrastructure - does government ideology matter?," CESifo Working Paper Series 7647, CESifo Group Munich.
    4. Pellegrini, Guido & Tarola, Ornella & Cerqua, Augusto & Ceccantoni, Giulia, 2018. "Can regional policies shape migration flows?," MPRA Paper 87874, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Marlon Fritz, 2019. "Data-Driven Local Polynomial Trend Estimation for Economic Data - Steady State Adjusting Trends," Working Papers Dissertations 49, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    6. repec:tpr:restat:v:101:y:2019:i:2:p:264-278 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Yuanhua Feng & Thomas Gries, 2017. "Data-driven local polynomial for the trend and its derivatives in economic time series," Working Papers CIE 102, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    8. repec:kap:pubcho:v:177:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-018-0591-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:eee:econom:v:207:y:2018:i:1:p:129-161 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Cattaneo, Matias D. & Crump, Richard K. & Farrell, Max H. & Schaumburg, Ernst, 2016. "Characteristic-sorted portfolios: estimation and inference," Staff Reports 788, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, revised 01 Feb 2019.
    11. repec:eee:anture:v:74:y:2019:i:c:p:1-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Delis, Manthos & Fringuellotti, Fulvia & Ongena, Steven, 2019. "Credit and Income," CEPR Discussion Papers 13468, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Marco Alberto De Benedetto, 2018. "Quality of Politicians and Electoral System. Evidence from a Quasi-experimental Design for Italian Cities," BCAM Working Papers 1802, Birkbeck Centre for Applied Macroeconomics.
    14. Matias D. Cattaneo & Richard K. Crump & Max H. Farrell & Yingjie Feng, 2019. "Binscatter Regressions," Papers 1902.09615, arXiv.org.
    15. Matias D. Cattaneo & Michael Jansson & Xinwei Ma, 2018. "Simple Local Polynomial Density Estimators," Papers 1811.11512, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2019.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1508.02973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (arXiv administrators). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.