IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1411.1103.html

Utility maximization in pure-jump models driven by marked point processes and nonlinear wealth dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Mauricio Junca
  • Rafael Serrano

Abstract

We explore martingale and convex duality techniques to study optimal investment strategies that maximize expected risk-averse utility from consumption and terminal wealth. We consider a market model with jumps driven by (multivariate) marked point processes and so-called non-linear wealth dynamics which allows to take account of relaxed assumptions such as differential borrowing and lending interest rates or short positions with cash collateral and negative rebate rates. We give suffcient conditions for existence of optimal policies for agents with logarithmic and CRRA power utility. We find closed-form solutions for the optimal value function in the case of pure-jump models with jump-size distributions modulated by a two-state Markov chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauricio Junca & Rafael Serrano, 2014. "Utility maximization in pure-jump models driven by marked point processes and nonlinear wealth dynamics," Papers 1411.1103, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1411.1103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1411.1103
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Jarrow & Dilip Madan, 1995. "Option Pricing Using The Term Structure Of Interest Rates To Hedge Systematic Discontinuities In Asset Returns1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(4), pages 311-336, October.
    2. Tomas Björk & Yuri Kabanov & Wolfgang Runggaldier, 1997. "Bond Market Structure in the Presence of Marked Point Processes," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(2), pages 211-239, April.
    3. He, Hua & Pearson, Neil D., 1991. "Consumption and portfolio policies with incomplete markets and short-sale constraints: The infinite dimensional case," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 259-304, August.
    4. Mark Schroder & Costis Skiadas, 2008. "Optimality And State Pricing In Constrained Financial Markets With Recursive Utility Under Continuous And Discontinuous Information," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 199-238, April.
    5. Goll, Thomas & Kallsen, Jan, 2000. "Optimal portfolios for logarithmic utility," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 31-48, September.
    6. Jakv{s}a Cvitani'c & Robert Liptser & Boris Rozovskii, 2006. "A filtering approach to tracking volatility from prices observed at random times," Papers math/0612212, arXiv.org.
    7. Domenico Cuoco & Hong Liu, 2000. "A Martingale Characterization of Consumption Choices and Hedging Costs with Margin Requirements," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(3), pages 355-385, July.
    8. Hua He & Neil D. Pearson, 1991. "Consumption and Portfolio Policies With Incomplete Markets and Short‐Sale Constraints: the Finite‐Dimensional Case1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 1-10, July.
    9. Tina Hviid Rydberg & Neil Shephard, 2003. "Dynamics of Trade-by-Trade Price Movements: Decomposition and Models," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 2-25.
    10. Jan Kallsen, 2000. "Optimal portfolios for exponential Lévy processes," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 51(3), pages 357-374, August.
    11. Helyette Geman & Dilip B. Madan & Marc Yor, 2001. "Asset Prices Are Brownian Motion: Only In Business Time," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Marco Avellaneda (ed.), Quantitative Analysis In Financial Markets Collected Papers of the New York University Mathematical Finance Seminar(Volume II), chapter 4, pages 103-146, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Rüdiger Frey & Wolfgang J. Runggaldier, 1999. "Risk-minimizing hedging strategies under restricted information: The case of stochastic volatility models observable only at discrete random times," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 50(2), pages 339-350, October.
    13. Jean-Luc Prigent, 2001. "Option Pricing with a General Marked Point Process," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 50-66, February.
    14. I. Klein & L. C. G. Rogers, 2007. "Duality In Optimal Investment And Consumption Problems With Market Frictions," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 225-247, April.
    15. Rüdiger Frey, 2000. "Risk Minimization with Incomplete Information in a Model for High‐Frequency Data," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 215-225, April.
    16. Robert J. Elliott & Tak Kuen Siu, 2013. "Option Pricing and Filtering with Hidden Markov-Modulated Pure-Jump Processes," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Oscar Lopez & Rafael Serrano, 2014. "Martingale approach to optimal portfolio-consumption problems in Markov-modulated pure-jump models," Papers 1406.3112, arXiv.org.
    18. Claudia Ceci & Anna Gerardi, 2006. "A Model For High Frequency Data Under Partial Information: A Filtering Approach," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(04), pages 555-576.
    19. Claudia Ceci & Anna Gerardi, 2009. "Pricing For Geometric Marked Point Processes Under Partial Information: Entropy Approach," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(02), pages 179-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Serrano & Camilo Castillo, 2018. "ALM for insurers with multiple underwriting lines and portfolio constraints: a Lagrangian duality approach," Papers 1810.08466, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    2. Ceci, Claudia & Colaneri, Katia & Cretarola, Alessandra, 2014. "A benchmark approach to risk-minimization under partial information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 129-146.
    3. Gerrard, Russell & Kyriakou, Ioannis & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Vodička, Peter, 2023. "On optimal constrained investment strategies for long-term savers in stochastic environments and probability hedging," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 948-962.
    4. Thijs Kamma & Antoon Pelsser, 2019. "Near-Optimal Dynamic Asset Allocation in Financial Markets with Trading Constraints," Papers 1906.12317, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    5. Oscar Lopez & Rafael Serrano, 2014. "Martingale approach to optimal portfolio-consumption problems in Markov-modulated pure-jump models," Papers 1406.3112, arXiv.org.
    6. Claudia Ceci & Anna Gerardi, 2011. "Utility indifference valuation for jump risky assets," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 34(2), pages 85-120, November.
    7. Paul Glasserman & S. G. Kou, 2003. "The Term Structure of Simple Forward Rates with Jump Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 383-410, July.
    8. Christoph Belak & An Chen & Carla Mereu & Robert Stelzer, 2014. "Optimal investment with time-varying stochastic endowments," Papers 1406.6245, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    9. Haluk Yener & Fuat Can Beylunioglu, 2017. "Outperforming A Stochastic Benchmark Under Borrowing And Rectangular Constraints," Working Papers 1701, The Center for Financial Studies (CEFIS), Istanbul Bilgi University.
    10. Ioannis Karatzas & Gordan Zitkovic, 2007. "Optimal consumption from investment and random endowment in incomplete semimartingale markets," Papers 0706.0051, arXiv.org.
    11. Yan Li & Baimin Yu, 2012. "Portfolio selection of a closed-end mutual fund," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 75(3), pages 245-272, June.
    12. Suresh M. Sundaresan, 2000. "Continuous‐Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1569-1622, August.
    13. Wahid Faidi & Hanen Mezghanni & Mohamed Mnif, 2019. "Expected Utility Maximization Problem Under State Constraints and Model Uncertainty," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 1123-1152, December.
    14. Julien Hugonnier & Dmitry Kramkov, 2004. "Optimal investment with random endowments in incomplete markets," Papers math/0405293, arXiv.org.
    15. Christoph Czichowsky & Rémi Peyre & Walter Schachermayer & Junjian Yang, 2018. "Shadow prices, fractional Brownian motion, and portfolio optimisation under transaction costs," Post-Print hal-02373296, HAL.
    16. Romain Deguest & Lionel Martellini & Vincent Milhau, 2018. "A Reinterpretation of the Optimal Demand for Risky Assets in Fund Separation Theorems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4333-4347, September.
    17. Wiesemann, Thomas, 1996. "Managing a value-preserving portfolio over time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 274-283, June.
    18. X. Chao & K. Lai & Shou-Yang Wang & Mei Yu, 2005. "Optimal Consumption Portfolio and No-Arbitrage with Nonproportional Transaction Costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 211-221, March.
    19. Christoph Czichowsky & Walter Schachermayer, 2014. "Duality Theory for Portfolio Optimisation under Transaction Costs," Papers 1408.5989, arXiv.org.
    20. Alev{s} v{C}ern'y & Johannes Ruf, 2020. "Simplified stochastic calculus via semimartingale representations," Papers 2006.11914, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1411.1103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.