Evaluating The Impact Of Integrated Pest Management On Agriculture And The Environment In The Texas Panhandle
Agricultural producers in the Texas High Plains are facing the worst comparative economic conditions since 1913. Under these circumstances it is desirable to evaluate which programs are beneficial to agricultural producers and which ones are not. The concept of Integrated Pest Management was introduced to the Texas High Plains in 1976 and since then many IPM practices have been adopted for the four major crops; corn, cotton, sorghum, and wheat. The reduction in production cost is used as a measure of economic benefit and contingent valuation is used to estimate the value of the environmental benefits. The IPM practices, which have been adopted, reduce the production cost by more than $173 million per year. In addition the practices reduce environmental cost, as estimated by contingent valuation, by more than $99 million per year. The total value of the economic and environmental benefits accruing to the Texas High Plains exceeds $272 million per year.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Mullen, Jeffrey D. & Norton, George W. & Reaves, Dixie Watts, 1997.
"Economic Analysis Of Environmental Benefits Of Integrated Pest Management,"
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,
Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(02), December.
- Mullen, Jeffrey D. & Norton, George W. & Reaves, Dixie W., 1997. "Economic Analysis of Environmental Benefits of Integrated Pest Management," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(02), pages 243-253, December.
- Darwin C. Hall & Gregory M. Duncan, 1984. "Econometric Evaluation of New Technology with an Application to Integrated Pest Management," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(5), pages 624-633. Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:waealo:36136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.