IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/utaeer/303914.html

Implications of COVID-19 on Tennessee Exports of Forest Products

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad, Andrew
  • Taylor, Adam

Abstract

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has spread across the globe since the first death in China in early January 2020. As COVID-19 began to spread across the U.S. in March 2020, businesses closed and individuals were asked to limit trips and comply with shelter-in-place or stay-at-home orders (Baker et al., 2020). Countries around the globe imposed similar measures. Consequently, the pandemic has negatively affected the global economy beyond anything experienced in nearly a century. Estimates so far indicate the virus could decrease global economic growth by 3.0 percent to 6.0 percent in 2020 (Jackson et al., 2020). While there have been extensive stories about the impact of COVID-19 on the U.S. food supply, little has been reported on how agriculture-related products primarily used in manufacturing have been impacted by COVID-19. In this report, we examine how the COVID-19 outbreak affected Tennessee forest product exports. The impacts of COVID-19 on forest products are due to supply and demand disruptions in both the finished wood products markets (e.g., furniture) and the interrelated market for raw materials and inputs (e.g., logs and lumber). Labor disruptions due to COVID-19 have resulted in decreased incomes, resulting in decreased demand for furniture and other finished wood products. Lockdowns and stay-at-home orders have limited shopping, also decreasing demand for these products. Given that labor is a primary resource for production, distribution and sales, stay-at-home and lockdown orders have also contributed to decreased sales due to limited product availability. Statista (2020) reported that U.S. furniture sales decreased by 21 percent in March and decreased by 49 percent in April when compared to previous months. U.S. imports of furniture and home furnishings were down $1.2 billion as of April 2020 when compared to same period (January-April) in 2019 (Census, 2020). This phenomenon is not limited to the U.S. (Jackson et al., 2020). Any decrease in demand for finished wood products in turn negatively affects the demand for forest products. It must also be noted that forest product sales, and exports in particular, have also been directly impacted by COVID-19. Labor disruptions have affected both production and distribution of forest products. Restrictions on movement have also affected transport and other trade-/market-facilitating activities (WTO, 2020), all of which have negatively affected Tennessee forest product exports. Like many forest-product exporting states, Tennessee exports mainly go to manufacturers in China. For instance, China accounted for almost half of Tennessee’s forest product exports in 2017 (Luppold et al., 2018; U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2020). Being so reliant on China for sales, Tennessee was particularly impacted by the U.S-China trade war, which is discussed briefly in this report and in a UT Extension report published earlier this year (Muhammad and Smith, 2020). More importantly, 2020 was expected to be a recovery year for U.S. exports due to the U.S.-China Phase One Trade Agreement (signed January 2020) and the announcement in February 2020 by China’s State Council Tariff Commission that U.S. commodities including forest products would be exempt from retaliatory tariffs (Inouye, 2020). Thus, it is conceivable that Chinese imports would have returned to pre-trade war levels in 2020. However, recent data show that not only did the COVID-19 outbreak thwart this potential recovery, but resulted in even greater losses when compared to 2019. In this report we examine how the COVID-19 outbreak impacted Tennessee forest product exports. To put this in context, we provide a background and overview of Tennessee production and exports and briefly discuss how the U.S.-China trade war impacted Tennessee. To assess the impacts of COVID-19, we examine the most recent trade data for 2020 and assess how Tennessee and U.S. exports in January-April 2020 compare to the same period in previous years. We close the report with a brief summary and implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad, Andrew & Taylor, Adam, "undated". "Implications of COVID-19 on Tennessee Exports of Forest Products," Extension Reports 303914, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:303914
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.303914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/303914/files/W913.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.303914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott R Baker & Robert A Farrokhnia & Steffen Meyer & Michaela Pagel & Constantine Yannelis & Jeffrey Pontiff, 0. "How Does Household Spending Respond to an Epidemic? Consumption during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(4), pages 834-862.
    2. Muhammad, Andrew & Smith, S. Aaron, "undated". "The U.S.-China Phase One Trade Agreement: Implications for U.S. Forestry," Extension Reports 302978, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad, Andrew & Hellwinckel, Chad M. & Nzayiramya, Savant & Taylor, Adam, "undated". "Economic Impact of Tennessee Forest Product Exports in 2021," Extension Reports 330847, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Muhammad, Andrew & Hellwinckel, Chad M. & Anosike, Ejimofor & Taylor, Adam, "undated". "Economic Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Tennessee Forest Product Exports," Extension Reports 319769, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Beer & Fabio Rumler & Joel Tölgyes, 2021. "Prices and inflation in Austria during the COVID-19 crisis – an analysis based on online price data," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q4/20-Q1/, pages 65-75.
    2. Sebastian Doerr & Leonardo Gambacorta & José María Serena Garralda, 2021. "Big data and machine learning in central banking," BIS Working Papers 930, Bank for International Settlements.
    3. Christopher D. Cotton & Vaishali Garga & Justin Rohan, 2021. "Consumption Spending during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Current Policy Perspectives 93430, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    4. George, Ammu & Li, Changtai & Lim, Jing Zhi & Xie, Taojun, 2021. "From SARS to COVID-19: The evolving role of China-ASEAN production network," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Karolina Perèiæ & Milica Slijepèeviæ & Pedja Ašanin Gole, 2023. "Factors influencing the purchase of fashion products before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: the example of Serbia," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 41(1), pages 65-89.
    6. Adarov, Amat & Guénette, Justin Damien & Ohnsorge, Franziska, 2022. "Another legacy of the COVID-19 pandemic: Income divergence," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 842-854.
    7. Bui, Dzung & Dräger, Lena & Hayo, Bernd & Nghiem, Giang, 2020. "Consumer Sentiment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Others‘ Beliefs," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-680, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, revised Apr 2021.
    8. Wang, Bingbing, 2022. "Housing market volatility under COVID-19: Diverging response of demand in luxury and low-end housing markets," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Muggleton, Naomi & Rahal, Charles & Reeves, Aaron, 2025. "Capitalizing on a crisis: a computational analysis of all five million British firms during the Covid-19 pandemic," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127228, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Steve Cicala, 2020. "Powering Work From Home," Working Papers 2020-147, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    11. Sungjo Hong & Seok-Hwan Choi, 2021. "The Urban Characteristics of High Economic Resilient Neighborhoods during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case of Suwon, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-39, April.
    12. Hugo S. Gonçalves & Sérgio Moro, 2023. "On the economic impacts of COVID‐19: A text mining literature analysis," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 375-394, February.
    13. Diane Alexander & Ezra Karger, 2023. "Do Stay-at-Home Orders Cause People to Stay at Home? Effects of Stay-at-Home Orders on Consumer Behavior," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(4), pages 1017-1027, July.
    14. Dang, Hai-Anh H. & Trinh, Trong-Anh, 2021. "Does the COVID-19 lockdown improve global air quality? New cross-national evidence on its unintended consequences," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Michael Christl & Silvia De Poli & Viginta Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė, 2025. "Correction: The rising tide lifts all boats? Income support measures for employees and self-employed during the COVID-19 pandemic," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 32(6), pages 1932-1933, December.
    16. Emanuela Ciapanna & Gabriele Rovigatti, 2022. "The Grocery Trolley Race in Times of Covid-19: Evidence from Italy," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 8(2), pages 471-498, July.
    17. Gu, Leilei & Liu, Zhongyang & Xu, Danyang, 2023. "The risk-mitigating role of corporate social responsibility in Chinese listed heavy-polluting companies: An extreme event experience perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    18. Carlomagno, Guillermo & Eterovic, Nicolás & Hernández-Román, Luis G., 2024. "Disentangling demand and supply inflation shocks from electronic payments data," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    19. Louis-Philippe Beland & Abel Brodeur & Taylor Wright, 2020. "COVID-19, Stay-at-Home Orders and Employment: Evidence from CPS Data," Carleton Economic Papers 20-04, Carleton University, Department of Economics, revised 19 May 2020.
    20. O’Connell, Martin & Smith, Kate & Stroud, Rebekah, 2022. "The dietary impact of the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:303914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.