IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

"Economic Development": A Suitable Case for Treatment?


  • Nixson, Frederick


No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Nixson, Frederick, 1984. ""Economic Development": A Suitable Case for Treatment?," Manchester Discussion Papers in Development Studies 232615, University of Manchester, School of Economics, International Development Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:umandp:232615

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Chenery, Hollis B, 1975. "The Structuralist Approach to Development Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 65(2), pages 310-316, May.
    2. Flammang, Robert A, 1979. "Economic Growth and Economic Development: Counterparts or Competitors?," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(1), pages 47-61, October.
    3. Deane,Phyllis, 1978. "The Evolution of Economic Ideas," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521293150.
    4. Palma, Gabriel, 1978. "Dependency: A formal theory of underdevelopment or a methodology for the analysis of concrete situations of underdevelopment?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 6(7-8), pages 881-924.
    5. Lall, Sanjaya, 1976. "Conflicts of concepts: Welfare economics and developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 181-195, March.
    6. Nugent, Jeffrey B. & Yotopoulos, Pan A., 1979. "What has orthodox development economics learned from recent experience?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 7(6), pages 541-554, June.
    7. Arndt, H W, 1981. "Economic Development: A Semantic History," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(3), pages 457-466, April.
    8. Hicks, Norman & Streeten, Paul, 1979. "Indicators of development: The search for a basic needs yardstick," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 7(6), pages 567-580, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Public Economics;


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umandp:232615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.