IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umaesp/14119.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Potential Impacts Of Bst On The Minnesota Milk Supply

Author

Listed:
  • Helming, John F.M.
  • Hammond, Jerome W.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Helming, John F.M. & Hammond, Jerome W., 1991. "Potential Impacts Of Bst On The Minnesota Milk Supply," Staff Papers 14119, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:14119
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/14119/files/p91-40.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.14119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaiser, Harry M., 1990. "A User's Guide to NEMPIS: National Economic Milk Policy Impact Simulator," Research Bulletins 183287, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Bruce A. Larson & Fred Kuchler, 1990. "The Simple Analytics of Technology Adoption: Bovine Growth Hormone and the Dairy Industry," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 12(1), pages 109-123.
    3. Alfons J. Weersink & Loren W. Tauer, 1989. "Comparative Analysis of Investment Models for New York Dairy Farms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(1), pages 136-146.
    4. Fallert, Richard & McGuckin, Tom & Betts, Carolyn & Bruner, Gary, 1987. "bST and the Dairy Industry: A National, Regional, and Farm-Level Analysis," Agricultural Economic Reports 308035, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Lazarus, William F., 1990. "Midwest Pork Producers' Characteristics And Planned Use Of Somatotropin," Staff Papers 14247, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Weersink, Alfons & Tauer, Loren, 1989. "The Distributional Impacts of Technical Change on the U.S. Dairy Sector," Staff Papers 187071, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    7. William B. Magrath & Loren W. Tauer, 1988. "New York Milk Supply with Bovine Growth Hormone," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 233-241.
    8. Penson, John B. & Chen, Dean T., 1988. "Design and Application of a Structural General Equilibrium Model to Farm Policy Analysis," Staff Reports 257926, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    9. Bruce W. Marion & Robert L. Wills, 1990. "A Prospective Assessment of the Impacts of Bovine Somatotropin: A Case Study of Wisconsin," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(2), pages 326-336.
    10. Milligan, Robert & Lesser, William H. & Magrath, William B. & Tauer, Loren & Bauman, Dale, 1985. "Biotechnology and Dairy Industry: Production costs, Commercial Potential, and the Economic Impact of the Bovine Growth Hormone," Research Bulletins 183730, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    11. Harry M. Kaiser & Loren W. Tauer, 1989. "Impact of Bovine Somatotropin on U.S. Dairy Markets under Alternative Policy Options," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 59-73.
    12. Westcott, Paul C., 1986. "A Quarterly Model of U.S. Dairy Sector and Some of Its Policy Implications," Technical Bulletins 157018, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Sellschopp, Jork & Kalter, Robert J., 1989. "Bovine Somatotropin: Its Impact on the Spatial Distribution of the U.S. Dairy Industry," Research Bulletins 183315, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    14. Tauer, Loren W., 1985. "The Impact of Bovine Growth Hormone on the New York Sector: An Example using Sector Linear Programming," Staff Papers 185987, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    15. Butler, L. J. & Carter, H. O., 1988. "Potential Economic Impacts of Bovine Somatotropin on the U.S. Dairy Industry--A West Coast Perspective," Agricultural Issues Center (AIC) Working Papers 228802, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bauman, Ronda & Hammond, Jerome W., 1993. "Feed Procurement Methods For Southeastern Minnesota Dairy Farms: A Comparison Using Lp Analysis," Staff Papers 13705, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caswell, Margriet F. & Fuglie, Keith O. & Klotz, Cassandra A., 1994. "Agricultural Biotechnology: An Economic Perspective," Agricultural Economic Reports 262025, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Kaiser, Harry M., 1990. "Bovine Somatotropin and Milk Production: Potential Impacts for the U.S," Staff Papers 121538, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    3. Kaiser, Harry M., 1992. "Market Impacts Of Bovine Somatropin: A Supply And Demand Analysis," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Tauer, Loren W., 1990. "Ex-ante Economic Assessment of Agriculture Biotechnology," Staff Papers 121528, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    5. McGuirk, Anya M. & Preston, Warren P. & Jones, Gerald M., 1992. "Introducing Foods Produced Using Biotechnology: The Case Of Bovine Somatotropin," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Lazarus, William F., 1990. "Midwest Pork Producers' Business Characteristics, Performance And Technology," Economic Reports 13042, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    7. Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G. & Bjornson, Bruce, 1997. "Vertical And Horizontal Coordination In The Agro-Biotechnology Industry: Evidence And Implications," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-11, July.
    8. Zdenko Stefanides & Loren W. Tauer, 1999. "The Empirical Impact of Bovine Somatotropin on a Group of New York Dairy Farms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(1), pages 95-102.
    9. Elbehri, Aziz & Yonkers, Robert D., 1995. "Economic Analysis Of The Impacts Of Bovine Somatotropin On The Profitability Of Representative Dairy Farms In The Northeast," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Tauer, Loren W. & Kaiser, Harry M., 1989. "Optimal Government Policy In Response To Bovine Somatotropin," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270658, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Zepeda, Lydia & Butler, Leslie J. & Carter, Harold O., 1991. "Simulating Bst Introduction In California For Dairy Policy Analysis," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Jarvis, Lovell S., 2000. "THE POTENTIAL EFFECT OF RECOMBINANT BOVINE SOMATOTROPIN (rbST) ON WORLD DAIRYING," Transitions in Agbiotech: Economics of Strategy and Policy, June 24-25, 1999, Washington, D.C. 26003, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    13. An, Henry, 2008. "The Adoption and Disadoption of Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin in the U.S. Dairy Industry," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6278, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Kaiser, Harry M. & Scherer, Clifford W. & Barbano, David M., 1992. "Consumer Perceptions And Attitudes Towards Bovine Somatotropin," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, April.
    15. Butler, Leslie J. & Henriques, Irene, 2001. "Adoption and Diffusion of Biotechnology: rbST in California," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 125548, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Fabienne Femenia & Laure Latruffe & Jean-Paul Chavas, 2021. "Responsiveness of farm investment to price changes: evidence from the French crop sector," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(34), pages 3972-3983, July.
    17. Zepeda, Lydia, 1989. "An Ex Ante Adoption Model Of Bovine Somatotropin By California Milk Producers," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270659, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Perrin, Richard K., 1990. "Economic Analysis Of Biotechnology Research," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-4, July.
    19. Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald J. & Kliebenstein, James B., 1993. "Impacts Of Pst On Optimal Production And Marketing Decisions Of A Grow-Finish Hog Farm Operation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-9, October.
    20. Kinnucan, Henry & Hatch, Upton & Molnar, Joseph J. & Venkateswaran, Meenakshi, 1990. "Scale Neutrality of Bovine Somatotropin: Ex Ante Evidence from the Southeast," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:14119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.