IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ualbpr/232114.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Future Directions for the Alberta Sheep Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan, M.M.
  • Hawkins, M.H.

Abstract

The primary focus of this study is to examine the short term, medium term and long term supply response for lamb, wool and cull sheep for the Alberta sheep industry. The sensitivity of supply to changes in market prices in estimated using two alternative analytical techniques. The first technique used is the repressentative farm linear programming procedure. This technique involves the estimation of medium term supply response fro the three products from farm level information. The industry level supply response is then derived by summation of the individual farm level supply estimates. The alternative procedure relates to the estimation of short-run and long-run supply response directly from industry level data using an econometric procedure. The results from both procedures indicate that lamb supply is sensitive to changes in market prices in the medium and long term, but that the supply of wool and cull sheep are relatively stable over large price ranges. Furthermore, the stability of the sheep industry is examined using a Markov chain process. This analytical technique examines the movement of farms between different size groups over a thirty-five year period from the early 1950s to the mid 1980s. The results indicate that there is a trend toward increased concentration in the industry with medium and large size sheep producers accounting for an ever increasing share of the industry. Small sheep producers over the same time period however, have shown a dramatic decline in terms of absolute number and industry share. A minor focus of this tudy involves a preliminary analysis of the demand for fresh and frozen lamb in Alberta. The empirical estiamtes of demand indicate that the price may not be as important a variable in fluencing the demand for lamb as is the case with other red meats. This may be attributed to the special characteristics of the lamb market. These characteristics relate to the low volume, low frequency and seasonality associated with lamb consumption. In general, kamb is regarded as a speciality mean with peak consumption occurring at Easter and Christmas. For lamb, demographic and socioeconomic variables are key variables in terms of influencing aggregate demand. The marketing strategies available to the sheep industry include demand expansion programs, supply management boards and centralized selling agencies. A centralized selling agency could have a significant positive impact on the industry in terms of increasing operational efficiency and perhaps pricing efficiency. Finally, a strategically oriented demand expansion program may be a mroe useful approach to increasing the aggregate demand for lamb.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan, M.M. & Hawkins, M.H., 1990. "Future Directions for the Alberta Sheep Industry," Project Report Series 232114, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ualbpr:232114
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.232114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/232114/files/ualberta-projectreports-90-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.232114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Powell, Alan A. & Gruen, Fred H.G., 1967. "The Estimation Of Production Frontiers: The Australian Livestock/Cereals Complex," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 11(01), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Hall, Nigel H. & Menz, Kenneth M., 1985. "Product Supply Elasticities for the Australian Broadacre Industries, Estimated with a Programming Model," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(01), pages 1-8, April.
    3. Richard H. Day, 1963. "On Aggregating Linear Programming Models of Production," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 45(4), pages 797-813.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Faminow, Merle D., 2012. "Presentation By The Manitoba Red Meat Forum To The Wdo Steering Committee," Research Bulletins 124308, University of Manitoba, Department of Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John D. Mullen & Julian M. Alston & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "The Impact Of Farm And Processing Research On The Australian Wool Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 33(1), pages 32-47, April.
    2. George Verikios, 2004. "A Model of the World Wool Market," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 04-24, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    3. Hall, Nigel H. & Menz, Kenneth M., 1985. "Product Supply Elasticities for the Australian Broadacre Industries, Estimated with a Programming Model," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(01), pages 1-8, April.
    4. Sriram Shankar & John Quiggin, 2013. "Production under uncertainty: a simulation study," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 207-215, June.
    5. Gomez-Limon, Jose A. & Riesgo, Laura, 2004. "Irrigation water pricing: differential impacts on irrigated farms," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 47-66, July.
    6. John O.S. Kennedy, 1975. "Using Regression Analysis To Reduce Aggregation Bias In Linear Programming Supply Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Gomez-Limon, Jose Antonio & Berbel, Julio & Arriaza Balmón, Manuel, 2005. "MCDM Farm System Analysis for Public Management of Irrigated Agriculture," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24676, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Li, Kuo & Griffith, Garry & Kingwell, Ross & Malcolm, Bill, 2017. "Measuring the Returns to Investment in Research and Development in the Australian Grains Industry," 2017 Conference (61st), February 7-10, 2017, Brisbane, Australia 258674, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Riesgo, Laura & Gómez-Limón, José A., 2005. "Multi-Criteria Policy Scenarios Analysis for Public Management of Irrigated Agriculture," 89th Seminar, February 2-5, 2005, Parma, Italy 239276, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Richard H. Day & Inderjit Singh, 1975. "A Dynamic Model of Regional Agricultural Development," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 1(1), pages 27-48, April.
    11. McKay, Lloyd & Lawrence, Denis & Vlastuin, Chris, 1982. "Production Flexibility and Technical Change in Australia's Wheat-Sheep Zone," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(01), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Bartolini, F. & Bazzani, G.M. & Gallerani, V. & Raggi, M. & Viaggi, D., 2007. "The impact of water and agriculture policy scenarios on irrigated farming systems in Italy: An analysis based on farm level multi-attribute linear programming models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 93(1-3), pages 90-114, March.
    13. José A. Gómez-Limón & Yolanda Martínez Martínez, 2004. "Multicriteria Modelling of Irrigation Water Market at Basin Level," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2004/26, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
    14. Mitter, Hermine & Schmid, Erwin, 2021. "Informing groundwater policies in semi-arid agricultural production regions under stochastic climate scenario impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    15. Freebairn, John W., 1992. "Dairy Industry Policy," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 60(01), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Kingwell, Ross S., 1995. "Effects of Tactical Responses and Risk Aversion on Farm Wheat Supply," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(01), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Ali Ferjani & Albert Zimmermann, 2013. "Estimating Agricultural Supply Response with the dynamic sectormodel SILAS-dyn," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 6(1), pages 155-176.
    18. Chai, Andreas & Stepanova, Elena & Moneta, Alessio, 2023. "Quantifying expenditure hierarchies and the expansion of global consumption diversity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 860-886.
    19. Kingwell, Ross, 1996. "Programming models of farm supply response: The impact of specification errors," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 307-324.
    20. Hardaker, J. Brian & Anderson, Jock R. & Dillon, John L., 1984. "Perspectives On Assessing The Impacts Of Improved Agricultural Technologies In Developing Countries," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 28(2-3), pages 1-22, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ualbpr:232114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/drualca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.