IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/quedwp/273625.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investment Complementarities, Coordination Failure and Systemic Bankruptcyd’

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Mei

Abstract

I argue that systemic bankruptcy of firms can originate from coordination failure in an economy with investment complementarities. This new explanation about the origin of systemic bankruptcy promotes better understanding of how financial fragility arises, and provides theoretical guidance for central banks to establish an “early warning system” to prevent the occurrence of financial crises. In a global game setup, investment decisions of firms are studied in the presence of uncertainty and investment complementarities. Uncertainty is twofold here: first, firms are uncertain about economic fundamentals; second, firms are also uncertain about other firms’ investment decisions. I demonstrate that even small uncertainty about economic fundamentals can be magnified through the uncertainty about other firms’ investment decisions and can lead to coordination failure, which may be manifested as systemic bankruptcy. Moreover, my model reveals that systemic bankruptcy tends to arise when economic fundamentals are in the middle range where coordination matters. High financial leverage of firms greatly increases the severity of systemic bankruptcy. Optimistic beliefs of firms and banks can alleviate coordination failure, but can also increase the severity of systemic bankruptcy once it happens.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Mei, 2007. "Investment Complementarities, Coordination Failure and Systemic Bankruptcyd’," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273625, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:273625
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.273625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/273625/files/qed_wp_1149.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.273625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:273625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.