IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/quedwp/273623.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Coordination Failure in Technological Progress, Economic Growth and Volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Mei

Abstract

Technological progress has long been posited to be crucial in a country’s economic growth. This paper argues that coordination failure in a country’s new technology investment can be one of the barriers in a country’s capital accumulation and economic growth. The global game established by Morris and Shin(2000) is extended to a two-sector Overlapping Generation model where capital goods can be produced by two different technologies. The first is a conventional technology with constant returns, which are perfectly revealed to economic agents. The second is a new technology exhibiting increasing return to scale due to technological externalities, whose returns economic agents only have incomplete information about. Economic agents have to choose which technology to invest. My model reveals that under certain circumstances coordination failure in the capital good sector will occur and be manifested as the under-investment in the new technology. In this way, I explain how coordination failure in a country’s technology updating process leads to slower capital accumulation and economic growth. More interestingly, the model generates a positive correlation between economic growth and volatility through a new channel associated with coordination failure. Policy implications are discussed as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Mei, 2007. "Coordination Failure in Technological Progress, Economic Growth and Volatility," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273623, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:273623
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.273623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/273623/files/qed_wp_1147.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.273623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:273623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.