IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333071.html

An Analysis of the Effects of Korea’s Energy Transition Using the GTAP-E-Power Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ko, Jong-Hwan

Abstract

The Korean government adopted its 8th Basic Plan for Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand for 2017-2031 (8th BPE) on December 29, 2017. The plan entails significant changes to the power mix, reflecting the challenges of raising the share of renewables, reducing nuclear and coal power, while, at the same time, keeping power tariffs under control. The 8th BPE aims to take into account the commitments made at the Paris Agreement on Climate and projects the share of gas at 18.8% in 2030 (16.9% in 2017) while those of coal and nuclear power are 36.1% and 23.9%, respectively (45.3% and 30.3% in 2017). The share of renewables will be raised to 20% by 2030 from 6.2% in 2017. Since the closure of the oldest nuclear reactor (Kori 1) in June 2017, Korea has been operating 24 nuclear reactors with a total capacity of 22.5 GW. Amid growing public concerns over nuclear safety, the government announced its nuclear phase-out roadmap in October 2017, which includes: a) the cancellation of plans to build the six planned nuclear reactors; b) no extension of the lifespan of 14 aging nuclear power reactors, totaling 12.5 GW of capacity; and c) the closure of Wolsong 1 (which is now the oldest reactor) earlier than scheduled. Korea will gradually reduce the number of nuclear reactors from 24 in 2017 to 18 in 2030. Nuclear power capacity will first increase to 27.5 GW by 2022, and then will gradually decline to 20.4 GW by 2030. This paper aims to quantify the economic and environmental impacts of Korea’s energy transition using the GTAP-E Power model (Peters, 2016). In this study, scenarios for Korea’s energy transition are formulated based on the 8th BPE. The potential macroeconomic and microeconomic effects and environmental impacts of the implementation of the 8th BPE are measured.

Suggested Citation

  • Ko, Jong-Hwan, 2019. "An Analysis of the Effects of Korea’s Energy Transition Using the GTAP-E-Power Model," Conference papers 333071, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333071/files/9273.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burniaux, Jean-Marc & Truong Truong, 2002. "GTAP-E: An Energy-Environmental Version of the GTAP Model," GTAP Technical Papers 923, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    2. Burniaux, Jean-March & Truong, Truong P., 2002. "Gtap-E: An Energy-Environmental Version Of The Gtap Model," Technical Papers 28705, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alvaro Calzadilla & Katrin Rehdanz & Richard S.J. Tol, 2008. "The Eonomic Impact Of More Sustainable Water Use In Agriculture: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," Working Papers FNU-169, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Dec 2008.
    2. Hoefnagels, Ric & Banse, Martin & Dornburg, Veronika & Faaij, André, 2013. "Macro-economic impact of large-scale deployment of biomass resources for energy and materials on a national level—A combined approach for the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 727-744.
    3. Arndt Feuerbacher & Jonas Luckmann, Humboldt-University of Berlin, 2017. "Modelling field operations in a computable general equilibrium model: An application to labour shortages in Bhutan," EcoMod2017 10464, EcoMod.
    4. Dihel, Nora, 2005. "Impact of services barriers on effective rates of protection in agriculture and manufacturing," Conference papers 331387, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. De Miguel, Carlos & Ludena, Carlos & Schuschny, Andres, 2009. "Climate Change and Reduction of CO2 Emissions: the role of Developing Countries in Carbon Trade Markets," Conference papers 331823, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Monge, Juan J. & Bryant, Henry L. & Gan, Jianbang & Richardson, James W., 2016. "Land use and general equilibrium implications of a forest-based carbon sequestration policy in the United States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 102-120.
    7. Scandizzo, Pasquale Lucio & Damania, Richard, 2025. "Modelling global water policies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 407-427.
    8. Tsung-Chen Lee & Hsiao-Chi Chen & Shi-Miin Liu, 2013. "Optimal strategic regulations in international emissions trading under imperfect competition," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 15(1), pages 39-57, January.
    9. Roberto Roson & Francesco Bosello, 2007. "Estimating a Climate Change Damage Function through General Equilibrium Modeling," Working Papers 2007_08, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    10. Doumax-Tagliavini, Virginie & Sarasa, Cristina, 2018. "Looking towards policies supporting biofuels and technological change: Evidence from France," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 430-439.
    11. Yujing Niu & Wenying Chen & Zongxin Wu, 2013. "The Economic and Environmental Impact on China of Carbon Tariffs Based on Gage Model," Energy & Environment, , vol. 24(7-8), pages 1295-1307, December.
    12. Ali, Tariq & Huang, Jikun & Yang, Jun, 2013. "Impact assessment of global and national biofuels developments on agriculture in Pakistan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 466-474.
    13. Yazid Dissou & Lilia Karnizova & Qian Sun, 2015. "Industry-level Econometric Estimates of Energy-Capital-Labor Substitution with a Nested CES Production Function," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 43(1), pages 107-121, March.
    14. Carmen Aina & Lorenzo Cappellari & Marco Francesconi, 2010. "Student Performance may not Improve when Universities are Choosier," CESifo Working Paper Series 3264, CESifo.
    15. Francesco Bosello & Andrea Bigano & Roberto Roson & Richard S.J. Tol, 2006. "Economy-Wide Estimates of the Implications of Climate Change: A Joint Analysis for Sea Level Rise and Tourism," Working Papers 2006.135, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    16. Alvaro Calzadilla & Katrin Rehdanz & Richard Betts & Pete Falloon & Andy Wiltshire & Richard Tol, 2013. "Climate change impacts on global agriculture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 357-374, September.
    17. Bosello, Francesco & Orecchia, Carlo & Parrado, Ramiro, 2013. "The additional contribution of non-CO2 mitigation in climate policy costs and efforts in Europe," Conference papers 332363, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    18. Maria Berrittella & Katrin Rehdanz & Roberto Roson & Richard S.J. Tol, 2006. "The Economic Impact Of Water Pricing: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," Working Papers FNU-96, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Jan 2006.
    19. Siriwardana, Mahinda & Meng, Sam & McNeill, Judith, 2013. "Border Adjustments under Unilateral Carbon Pricing: Are they Warranted in the Case of Australian Carbon Tax?," Conference papers 332357, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Mörsdorf, George, 2022. "A simple fix for carbon leakage? Assessing the environmental effectiveness of the EU carbon border adjustment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.