IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332950.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this paper

Time Use and the Care Economy in Latin America: A General Equilibrium Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cicowiez, Martin

Abstract

In this paper, our interest is in assessing the impact of various policy measures on the care economy in Latin America. Specifically, we plan to quantify the macro and meso impacts of an increase in the government provision of goods and services related to the care economy. In terms of method, we extended GEM-Core, a recursive-dynamic CGE model documented in Cicowiez and Lofgren (2017), to make it gender-aware and single out aspects related to the care economy. Specifically, our model includes: (1) male and female labor categories, (2) formal and informal segments in the labor market, and (3) unpaid domestic and care work, and (4) labor-leisure choice or labor supply decision for men and women separately. In Latin America, female employment – both paid and unpaid -- predominates in unpaid domestic and care work. In terms of literature, our model contains the elements that Fontana (2013) describes as those required to analyze gender issues in general and the care economy in particular. In terms of results, we find relevant impacts from simulating changes in the government supply of services related to the care economy, such as childcare services. Furthermore, we single out the key parameter governing the impact of such shocks. In fact, we find that parameters such as the elasticity of substitution between male and female workers and the price-elasticity of domestic work have have a significant impact on our quantitative results. Therefore, we perform a sensitivity analysis regarding the value assigned to these particular parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Cicowiez, Martin, 2018. "Time Use and the Care Economy in Latin America: A General Equilibrium Analysis," Conference papers 332950, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332950/files/8908.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cicowiez,Martin & Lofgren,Hans & Cicowiez,Martin & Lofgren,Hans, 2017. "A GEM for streamlined dynamic CGE analysis : structure, interface, data, and macro application," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8272, The World Bank.
    2. Ferri, Javier & Moltó, María Luisa & Uriel, Ezequiel, 2005. "Time Use, Computable General Equilibrium and Tax Policy Analysis," Conference papers 331322, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Ismaël Fofana & John Cockburn & Bernard Decaluwé, 2005. "Developing Country Superwomen: Impacts of Trade Liberalisation on Female Market and Domestic Work," Cahiers de recherche 0519, CIRPEE.
    4. Fontana, Marzia & Wood, Adrian, 2000. "Modeling the Effects of Trade on Women, at Work and at Home," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1173-1190, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos Mabugu & Margaret Chitiga, 2009. "Liberalising Trade In South Africa: A Survey Of Computable General Equilibrium Studies," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 77(3), pages 445-464, September.
    2. Escalante, Luis Enrique & Maisonnave, Helene, 2022. "Impacts of climate disasters on women and food security in Bolivia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:427404 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Cicowiez, Martin & Akinyemi, Opeyemi & Sesan, Temilade & Adu, Omobola & Sokeye, Babajide, 2022. "Gender-differentiated impacts of a Rural Electrification Policy in Nigeria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Audi, Marc & Ali, Amjad, 2016. "Gender Gap and Trade Liberalization: An Analysis of some selected SAARC countries," MPRA Paper 83520, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Lofgren, Hans & Fontana, Marzia & Kim, Kijong, 2018. "Care in an Aging East Asian Economy: Policy options and impacts on households and labor markets," Conference papers 333004, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Arndt, Channing & Benfica, Rui & Thurlow, James, 2011. "Gender Implications of Biofuels Expansion in Africa: The Case of Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1649-1662, September.
    8. Maisonnave, Hélène & Mamboundou, Pierre Nziengui, 2022. "Agricultural economic reforms, gender inequality and poverty in Senegal," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 361-374.
    9. Diaz-Bonilla, Eugenio & Robinson, Sherman & Thomas, Marcelle, 2002. "On boxes, contents, and users: Food security and the WTO negotiations," TMD discussion papers 82, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Birhanu Megersa Lenjiso & Jeroen Smits & Ruerd Ruben, 2016. "Smallholder Milk Market Participation and Intra-household Time Allocation in Ethiopia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(5), pages 808-825, November.
    11. Fofana, Ismaël & Corong, Erwin & Chatti, Rim & Bouazouni, Omar, 2012. "Taxation policy and gender employment in the Middle East and North Africa Region: A comparative analysis of Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia," IFPRI discussion papers 1227, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Diaz-Bonilla, Carolina & Robinson, Sherman & Lofgren, Hans & Ahmed, Hashim A., 2006. "Growth Strategies to Reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in Ethiopia," Conference papers 331522, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Acheampong, Alex O. & Opoku, Eric Evans Osei & Amankwaa, Afua & Dzator, Janet, 2024. "Energy poverty and gender equality in education: Unpacking the transmission channels," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    14. Ikhide, Emily Edoisa & Umaru, Ezra K. & Oyebola, Fehintola & Omoju, Oluwasola E., 2021. "A CGE Analysis of the Gender Productivity Gap in Nigeria’s Agriculture Sector," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315922, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Ezequiel Uriel & Javier Ferri & Maria Luisa Molto, 2005. "Estimation of an Extended SAM with household production for Spain 1995," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 255-278.
    16. Hafsa Qaiser & Hafeez ur Rehman & Noman Arshed, 2023. "Role of institutional quality on women's empowerment—A case of highly gender unequal Asian countries," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 48-75, March.
    17. Emran, Shahe & Shilpi, Forhad, 2018. "Agricultural Productivity, Hired Labor, Wages, and Poverty: Evidence from Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 470-482.
    18. Ostry, Jonathan D. & Espinoza, Raphael & Papageorgiou, Chris, 2019. "The Armistice of the Sexes: Gender Complementarities in the Production Function," CEPR Discussion Papers 13792, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Ojeaga, Paul & Odejimi, Deborah, 2013. "Do Institutions Reduce Gender Discrimination? Evidence from Labor Market Participation Rate in Some Selected African Countries," MPRA Paper 55574, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Escalante, Luis Enrique & Maisonnave, Helene, 2021. "Evaluating the Regional Impacts of Climate Change on Women's Well-Being, Domestic Burdens and Food Security in Bolivia," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315851, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    21. Chen, Zhihong & Ge, Ying & Lai, Huiwen & Wan, Chi, 2013. "Globalization and Gender Wage Inequality in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 256-266.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.