IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332620.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EU agricultural domestic support in GTAP: a proposal for an alternative approach

Author

Listed:
  • Boulanger, Pierre H
  • Philippidis, George
  • Jensen, Hans Grinsted

Abstract

The engagement of JRC IPTS in the GTAP contributing team to the EU domestic support has opened up the opportunity to use the CATS database when compiling EU domestic support payments by member state, which are subsequently calibrated into the GTAP database. To maintain consistency, the GTAP version 9 includes EU domestic support which follows the approach adopted in the previous releases (Jensen, 2009, 2010). The difference is for pillar 1 support for which the CATS data are used (in previous GTAP database releases, pillar 1 support was based on EAGF financial reports). All together EU domestic support amounts to 66,530 million euros in 2011 (i.e. pillar 1 expenditures from CATS, pillar 2 and national expenditures from Producer Support Estimate (PSE) by OECD). In addition, minor improvements to the allocation of payments have been proposed for the version 9 release. On the other hand previous research at JRC IPTS (Boulanger and Philippidis, 2014, 2015) showed that when comparing with the CATS database, the GTAP database was incomplete, particularly in its representation of CAP rural development payments, or so called pillar 2 payments. This paper compares the EU domestic support approach adopted in the GTAP database version 9 with an alternative one in order to make the representation of CAP expenditures more transparent and comprehensive. Such an alternative allocation includes more payments than the traditional method employed (e.g. the proposed classification includes support currently defined as General Services Support Estimate (GSSE) by the OECD). Finally, introducing this new accounting convention for the EU domestic support in the GTAP database would lead to data discrepancies with other non-EU countries and/or regions, jeopardising robust comparative analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Boulanger, Pierre H & Philippidis, George & Jensen, Hans Grinsted, 2015. "EU agricultural domestic support in GTAP: a proposal for an alternative approach," Conference papers 332620, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332620/files/7725.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boulanger, Pierre & Philippidis, George, 2014. "Modelling the Common Agricultural Policy. General equilibrium effects of the 2014-2020 budget agreement," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182789, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Boulanger, Pierre & Philippidis, George, 2015. "The EU budget battle: Assessing the trade and welfare impacts of CAP budgetary reform," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 119-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boulanger, Pierre H & Dudu, Hasan & Ferrari, Emanuele & M'barek, Robert & Philippidis, George, 2017. "2030 European agricultural policy: A new CAP at a crossroad between market competitiveness and sustainability," Conference papers 332882, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Hasan Dudu & Emanuele Ferrari, 2018. "Estimation and Modelling Impacts of Pillar 2 Measures on the Agricultural Sector: Workshop proceedings," JRC Research Reports JRC111756, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Piotr Bórawski & Marta Guth & Andrzej Parzonko & Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & James William Dunn, 2021. "Price volatility of milk and dairy products in Poland after accession to the EU," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(3), pages 111-119.
    4. Marcin Pigłowski, 2021. "The Intra-European Union Food Trade with the Relation to the Notifications in the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Mark Christopher Navin & J. M. Dieterle, 2018. "Cooptation or solidarity: food sovereignty in the developed world," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(2), pages 319-329, June.
    6. Garrone, Maria & Emmers, Dorien & Olper, Alessandro & Swinnen, Johan, 2019. "Jobs and agricultural policy: Impact of the common agricultural policy on EU agricultural employment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Artiom Volkov & Tomas Balezentis & Mangirdas Morkunas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "In a Search for Equity: Do Direct Payments under the Common Agricultural Policy Induce Convergence in the European Union?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Freund, Florian & Soisontes, Sakson & Laquai, Verena & Banse, Martin, 2025. "Global land-use implications of preference shifts towards regional feed and sustainable diets in Germany and the European Union," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    9. Gohin, Alexandre & Zheng, Yu, 2015. "Assessing the Market Impacts of the Common Agricultural Policy: Does Farmers’ Risk Attitude Matter?," 2015: Trade and Societal Well-Being, December 13-15, 2015, Clearwater Beach, Florida 229235, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    10. Urban, Kirsten & Jensen, Hans G. & Brockmeier, Martina, 2016. "How decoupled is the Single Farm Payment and does it matter for international trade?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 126-138.
    11. Ole Boysen & Kirsten Boysen‐Urban & Alan Matthews, 2023. "Stabilizing European Union farm incomes in the era of climate change," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1634-1658, September.
    12. Boysen-Urban, Kirsten & Boysen, Ole & Matthews, Alan & Brockmeier, Martina, "undated". "EU Common Agricultural Policy Post-2020: Exploring the Effects of Safety-Net Policy Instruments," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276200, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Alexandre Gohin & Yu Zheng, 2016. "Assessing the Market Impacts of the Common Agricultural Policy: Does Farmers' Risk Attitude Matter?," FOODSECURE Working papers 46, LEI Wageningen UR.
    14. Piotr Bórawski & Adam Pawlewicz & Andrzej Parzonko & Jayson, K. Harper & Lisa Holden, 2020. "Factors Shaping Cow’s Milk Production in the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Marlen Haß, 2022. "Coupled support for sugar beet in the European Union: Does it lead to market distortions?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 86-111, February.
    16. Joanna Sredzinska & Pawel Sieminski & Monika Godek, 2021. "Income Situation of Dairy Farms in European Union Countries: A Synthetic Approach," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3 - Part ), pages 993-1011.
    17. George Philippidis & Robert M’barek & Emanuele Ferrari, 2016. "Is ‘Bio-Based’ Activity a Panacea for Sustainable Competitive Growth?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Pierre Boulanger & George Philippidis, 2015. "The End of a Romance? A Note on the Quantitative Impacts of a ‘Brexit’ from the EU," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 832-842, September.
    19. George Philippidis & Robert M’barek & Emanuele Ferrari, 2016. "Drivers of the European Bioeconomy in Transition (BioEconomy2030): an exploratory, model-based assessment," JRC Research Reports JRC98160, Joint Research Centre.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.