IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332241.html

A General Equilibrium Analysis of Alternative Scenarios for Food and Energy Subsidy Reforms in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Gharibnavaz, M. Reza
  • Waschik, Robert

Abstract

In 1996 the government of Iran submitted its application to join the World Trade Organization (WTO). To meet WTO obligations, the government has launched several marketoriented reforms to deal with existing distortions such as heavily subsidized food and petroleum products. From the beginning of 2002, the Iranian government committed itself to implementing subsidy policy reform intended to adjust distortions and structural imbalances. However, the impact of the reform on needy and vulnerable households was a source of concern. In this paper we use the GTAP7inGAMS static CGE model with 20 household types in rural and urban areas, grouped according to income, to simulate the welfare impacts of subsidy policy reform in Iran. The static GTAP7inGAMS model is calibrated using the GTAP 7 database representing the world economy for 2004. Subsidy rates were adjusted by incorporating protection data prepared by Iranian statistical centers, and the Petroleum and Coal Products (p-c) sector in the GTAP7 database was disaggregated into four energy commodities: gasoline, diesel, kerosene and fuel oil, since the initial level of subsidies on these energy commodities reported by Iranian statistical centers are quite different from each other. Results indicate that removing food and energy subsidies and introducing compensating direct income payments to all income groups would significantly increase the welfare levels of lower income households in rural areas and all income households in urban areas reflecting the high level of distortions. However, the reform would make the highest income rural households worse off.

Suggested Citation

  • Gharibnavaz, M. Reza & Waschik, Robert, 2012. "A General Equilibrium Analysis of Alternative Scenarios for Food and Energy Subsidy Reforms in Iran," Conference papers 332241, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332241/files/6029.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao-guang Zhang, 2006. "Armington Elasticities and Terms of Trade Effects in Global CGE Models," Staff Working Papers 0601, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    2. de Boer, P.M.C., 2009. "Modeling household behavior in a CGE model: linear expenditure system or indirect addilog?," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-16, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    3. Capps, Oral, Jr., 1983. "Alternative Estimation Methods Of Nonlinear Demand Systems," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(01), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Thomas Rutherford, 1987. "A Modeling System for Applied General Equilibrium Analysis," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 836, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    5. Braithwait, Steven D, 1980. "The Substitution Bias of the Laspeyres Price Index: An Analysis Using Estimated Cost-of-Living Indexes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(1), pages 64-77, March.
    6. Mraz, Marian & Matthews, Alan, 2007. "Disaggregating the dairy sector in the GTAP database," Conference papers 331616, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandru Voicu & Michael L. Lahr, 2004. "Expenditure-based Interarea Cost of Living Index," Urban/Regional 0403006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Osbat, Chiara & Conflitti, Cristina & Eiglsperger, Martin & Goldhammer, Bernhard & Kuik, Friderike & Menz, Jan-Oliver & Rumler, Fabio & Moreno, Marta Saez & Segers, Lina & Wieland, Elisabeth & Bellocc, 2023. "Measuring inflation with heterogeneous preferences, taste shifts and product innovation: methodological challenges and evidence from microdata," Occasional Paper Series 323, European Central Bank.
    3. Michael J. Boskin, 1998. "Consumer Prices, the Consumer Price Index, and the Cost of Living," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 3-26, Winter.
    4. Ainura Uzagalieva & Antonio Menezes, 2009. "The poverty effect of remittance flows: evidence from Georgia," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 453-474.
    5. Lieu, Pang-Tien & Liang, Jung-Hui & Chen, Jui-Hui, 2008. "Consumer preferences and cost of living in Taiwan," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 224-235, June.
    6. Atuesta, Laura & Paredes, Araya, 2011. "A Spatial Cost of Living Index for Colombia using a Microeconomic Approach and Censored Data," MPRA Paper 30580, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Wesseh, Presley K. & Lin, Boqiang, 2019. "Environmental policy and ‘double dividend’ in a transitional economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Evans, David & Gasiorek, Michael & McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman, 2006. "Trade Liberalisation with Trade Induced Technical Change in Morocco and Egypt: Findings and Wider Research Implications," Conference papers 331529, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Hoffmann, Johannes, 1998. "Problems of inflation measurement in Germany," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 1998,01e, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    10. Shane Greenstein & Ryan C. McDevitt, 2009. "The Broadband Bonus: Accounting for Broadband Internet's Impact on U.S. GDP," NBER Working Papers 14758, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Phouphet Kyophilavong & Michael C. S. Wong & Somchith Souksavath & Bin Xiong, 2017. "Impacts of trade liberalization with China and Chinese FDI on Laos: evidence from the CGE model," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 215-228, July.
    12. Marshall Reinsdorf & Jack E. Triplett, 2009. "A Review of Reviews: Ninety Years of Professional Thinking About the Consumer Price Index," NBER Chapters, in: Price Index Concepts and Measurement, pages 17-83, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. R. A. Somerville, 2004. "Changes in Relative Consumer Prices and the Substitution Bias of the Laspeyres Price Index - Ireland, 1985-2001," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 35(1), pages 55-82.
    14. Alastair Cunningham, 1996. "Measurement Bias in Price Indices: An Application to the UK's RPI," Bank of England working papers 47, Bank of England.
    15. Natalia Vechiu & Oscar Kuikeu, 2009. "The impact of globalization on FDIs: an empirical assessment for Central and Eastern European Countries," Post-Print hal-01881848, HAL.
    16. Mérette Marcel & Georges Patrick, 2010. "Demographic Changes and the Gains from Globalisation: An Analysis of Ageing, Capital Flows, and International Trade," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-39, October.
    17. Cook, Jonathan Aaron, 2013. "Does Chinese Inflation Understate Cost of Living?," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150571, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Banse, Martin & Faaij, Andre & Hoefnagels, Ric & Dornburg, Veronika, 2009. "Analysis of the Economic Impact of Large-Scale Deployment of Biomass Resources for Energy and Materials in the Netherlands," Conference papers 331902, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Georges, Patrick & Lisenkova, Katerina & Mérette, Marcel, 2013. "Can the ageing North benefit from expanding trade with the South?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 990-998.
    20. Semieniuk, Gregor, 2024. "Inconsistent definitions of GDP: Implications for estimates of decoupling," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.