IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332135.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The marginal costs of funds in the VATTAGE model of Finland: a back of the envelope justification of the welfare effects of additional government revenue

Author

Listed:
  • Dixon, Peter B.
  • Honkatukia, Juha
  • Rimmer, Maureen T.

Abstract

This paper is part of a larger study on public finance aspects of population ageing in Finland. We are using the VATTAGE model to calculate the welfare effects of various tax increases designed to improve the budgetary position of the Finnish government, that is we are calculating the marginal cost of funds (MCF) raised by different taxes. VATTAGE has been extended to include leisure and savings choice in the specification of household behaviour. This extension is necessary for useful MCF calculations. The main contribution of this paper is the development of a back-of-the-envelope (BOTE) equation to guide the explanation of MCF results generated from a full-scale, dynamic CGE model.

Suggested Citation

  • Dixon, Peter B. & Honkatukia, Juha & Rimmer, Maureen T., 2011. "The marginal costs of funds in the VATTAGE model of Finland: a back of the envelope justification of the welfare effects of additional government revenue," Conference papers 332135, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332135/files/5324.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott McDonald & Sherman Robinson & Karen Thierfelder, 2007. "Globe: A SAM Based Global CGE Model using GTAP Data," Departmental Working Papers 14, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    2. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Wang, Zhi, 1995. "Beyond the Uruguay Round: The implications of an Asian free trade area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 35-90.
    3. Jaime de MELO & Sherman ROBINSON, 2015. "Product Differentiation And The Treatment Of Foreign Trade In Computable General Equilibrium Models Of Small Economies," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Modeling Developing Countries' Policies in General Equilibrium, chapter 2, pages 21-41, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2008. "Asian Growth and Trade Poles: India, China, and East and Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 210-234, February.
    5. Devaragan, Shantayanan & Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman, 1990. "Policy lessons from trade-focused, two-sector models," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 625-657.
    6. Walmsley, Terrie L. & Winters, L. Alan & Ahmed, S. Amer & Parsons, Christopher R., 2005. "Measuring the Impact of the Movement of Labour Using a Model of Bilateral Migration Flows," Conference papers 331440, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Russell King & Mark Thomson, 2008. "The Southern European model of immigration: do the cases of Malta, Cyprus and Slovenia fit?," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 265-291.
    8. N D Diamantides & S T Constantinou, 1989. "Modeling the Macrodynamics of International Migration: Determinants of Emigration from Cyprus, 1946–85," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(7), pages 927-950, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haita, Corina, 2011. "An Emissions Trading Scheme with Auctioning," Conference papers 332086, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2008. "Asian Growth and Trade Poles: India, China, and East and Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 210-234, February.
    3. McDonald, Scott & Willenbockel, Dirk, 2008. "India, Brazil, South Africa and China: Is the South Big Enough?," Conference papers 331723, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Sonmez, Yontem & McDonald, Scott, 2012. "An EU-ASEAN Free Trade Area with a focus on Singapore and Malaysia," Conference papers 332221, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Osman, Rehab Osman Mohamed, 2012. "The EU Economic Partnership Agreements with Southern Africa: a computable general equilibrium analysis," Economics PhD Theses 0412, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    6. Scott McDonald & Sherman Robinson & Karen Thierfelder, 2007. "Globe: A SAM Based Global CGE Model using GTAP Data," Departmental Working Papers 14, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    7. Ahmed, S. Amer & Baris, Enis & Go, Delfin S & Lofgren, Hans & Osorio Rodarte, Israel & Thierfelder, Karen, 2017. "Assessing the Global Economic and Poverty Effects of Antimicrobial Resistance," Conference papers 332903, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Sugiyarto, Guntur & Sinclair, M. Thea & Blake, Adam, 2001. "The Economic Effects and Distributional Implications of Globalisation and Foreign Tourism Boom in the Indonesian Economy: A CGE Assessment," Conference papers 330925, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Ahmed, Syud Amer & Barış, Enis & Go, Delfin S. & Lofgren, Hans & Osorio-Rodarte, Israel & Thierfelder, Karen, 2018. "Assessing the global poverty effects of antimicrobial resistance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 148-160.
    10. Gonzalez–Mellado, Aida, 2006. "Assessment of Poverty Impacts of Trade Liberalization by Integration of Household Analysis in CGE Models: Possibilities and Perspectives," Conference papers 331521, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Bamiere, Laure & Bureau, Jean Christophe & Guindé, Loïc & Guyomard, Hervé & Jacquet, Florence & Treguer, David, 2008. "Energy efficiency, environmental benefits and cost competitiveness of EU biofuels," Conference papers 331726, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Lee, Jong Eun, 2002. "Does Sequence Matter in Free Trade Area?," Conference papers 331010, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Adkins, Liwayway G. & Garbaccio, Richard F., 2007. "Coordinating Global Trade and Environmental Policy: The Role of Pre-Existing Distortions," Conference papers 331592, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. McDonald, Scott & Thierfelder, Karen & Walmsley, Terrie, 2014. "Factor Market Flexibility and the Implications of Trade Policy Reforms," Conference papers 332469, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2006. "Impact of switching production to bioenergy crops: The switchgrass example," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 243-265, March.
    16. Erwin Corong & Thomas Hertel & Robert McDougall & Marinos Tsigas & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2017. "The Standard GTAP Model, version 7," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 2(1), pages 1-119, June.
    17. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Wang, Zhi, 1995. "Beyond the Uruguay Round: The implications of an Asian free trade area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 35-90.
    18. Karov, Vuko & Roberts, Donna & Grant, Jason H. & Peterson, Everett, 2009. "An Empirical Assessment of Phytosanitary Regulations on US Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Imports," Conference papers 331832, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. repec:pra:mprapa:15377 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Go, Delfin & McDonald, Scott & Thierfelder, Karen & Walmsley, Terrie, 2014. "R-2-3: A Simple Global CGE Analysis Focusing on Macroeconomic Links," Conference papers 332452, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    21. Bruno Lanz & Thomas F. Rutherford, 2016. "GTAPINGAMS, version 9: Multiregional and small open economy models with alternative demand systems," IRENE Working Papers 16-08, IRENE Institute of Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Economics; Financial Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.