IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ovdeia/295968.html

Institutionalising Farmer Participation In Adaptive Technology Testing With The `Cial'

Author

Listed:
  • Ashby, Jacqueline
  • Gracia, Teresa
  • Guerrero, Maria
  • Quiros, Carlos
  • Roa, Jose
  • Beltran, Jorge

Abstract

Public sector research and extension agencies are frequently unable (because of cost constraints) or unwilling to serve the needs of small farmers living in complex, diverse and risk-prone environments. This paper describes one attempt to increase these farmers' demand-pull on public sector and non-governmental technology-providing agencies by harnessing their capacity for local experimentation and combining it with some of the techniques of more formal agricultural research. The CIAT IPRA programme has provided resources, technical support and management training to locally elected committees (CIALs), composed of 'experimenting' farmers, which manage and conduct research on behalf of the community as a whole. The community is responsible not only for the election of the committee, but also for setting the agenda for research and helping to evaluate the results. The risks of conducting research are reduced by the existence of a fund — which is 'owned' by the community as a whole — on which the committees can draw should the experimentation result in financial losses. So far 55 of these committees have been established in Colombia since the programme began in 1990. A number of these have evolved into significant local seed production enterprises. The committees as a group have now formed their own corporation. This enhances the scope for information exchange and puts them on an independent financial footing. Other committees have been established in Bolivia, Ecuador, Honduras and Peru. The CIAT programme has monitored the progress of the Colombian CIALs and developed a range of training materials which can be used by others interested in establishing committees. This paper looks at the results of the programme, focusing in particular on the support needs of CIALs and the relative costs and quality of CIAL research. It also notes some of the distributional and institutional issues which are expected to be important to the future adoption of the CIAL approach to adaptive agricultural research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashby, Jacqueline & Gracia, Teresa & Guerrero, Maria & Quiros, Carlos & Roa, Jose & Beltran, Jorge, 1995. "Institutionalising Farmer Participation In Adaptive Technology Testing With The `Cial'," Overseas Development Institute Archive 295968, Overseas Development Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ovdeia:295968
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.295968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/295968/files/odi048.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.295968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashby, Jacqueline & Sperling, Louise, 1994. "Institutionalising Participatory, Client-Driven Research And Technology Development In Agriculture," Overseas Development Institute Archive 295957, Overseas Development Institute.
    2. Duncan, Alex, 1993. "Financing agricultural services in sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 463-465, December.
    3. Birkhaeuser, Dean & Evenson, Robert E & Feder, Gershon, 1991. "The Economic Impact of Agricultural Extension: A Review," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(3), pages 607-650, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Authors Femi Michael Oluwatusin, 2014. "The Perception of and Adaptation to Climate Change among Cocoa Farm Households in Ondo State, Nigeria," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 3, March.
    2. Chatterjee, Diti & Dinar, Ariel & González-Rivera, Gloria, 2019. "Impact of Agricultural Extension on Irrigated Agriculture Production and Water Use in California," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2019.
    3. Doris Läpple & Thia Hennessy & Carol Newman, 2013. "Quantifying the Economic Return to Participatory Extension Programmes in Ireland: an Endogenous Switching Regression Analysis," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 467-482, June.
    4. Edward Ebo ONUMAH & Bernhard BRÜMMER & Gabriele HÖRSTGEN-SCHWARK, 2010. "Productivity of the hired and family labour and determinants of technical inefficiency in Ghana's fish farms," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 79-88.
    5. Emerick, Kyle & Kelley, Erin & De Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 2019. "Endogenous Information Sharing and the Gains from Using Network Information to Maximize Technology Adoption," CEPR Discussion Papers 13507, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Leuveld, Koen & Nillesen, Eleonora & Pieters, Janneke & Ross, Martha & Voors, Maarten & Wang Sonne, Elise, 2018. "Agricultural extension and input subsidies to reduce food insecurity. Evidence from a field experiment in the Congo," MERIT Working Papers 2018-009, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. Stefan Dercon & Daniel O. Gilligan & John Hoddinott & Tassew Woldehanna, 2009. "The Impact of Agricultural Extension and Roads on Poverty and Consumption Growth in Fifteen Ethiopian Villages," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(4), pages 1007-1021.
    8. Tambo, Justice A. & Uzayisenga, Bellancile & Mugambi, Idah & Bundi, Mary & Silvestri, Silvia, 2020. "Plant clinics, farm performance and poverty alleviation: Panel data evidence from Rwanda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    9. Mattia Romani, 2004. "The impact of extension services in times of crisis: Côte d’Ivoire (1997-2000)," Development and Comp Systems 0409053, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Baidu-Forson, J., 1999. "Factors influencing adoption of land-enhancing technology in the Sahel: lessons from a case study in Niger," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 231-239, May.
    11. Anthony Cawley & Cathal O’Donoghue & Kevin Heanue & Rachel Hilliard & Maura Sheehan, 2018. "The Impact of Extension Services on Farm‐level Income: An Instrumental Variable Approach to Combat Endogeneity Concerns," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 585-612, December.
    12. Nava Ashraf & Xavier Giné & Dean Karlan, 2009. "Finding Missing Markets (and a Disturbing Epilogue): Evidence from an Export Crop Adoption and Marketing Intervention in Kenya," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(4), pages 973-990.
    13. Pemsl, Diemuth E. & Waibel, Hermann & Witt, Rudolf, 2006. "Diffusion of information among small-scale farmers in Senegal: the concept of Farmer Field Schools," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2006 30, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    14. James Roumasset, 2006. "The Economics of Agricultural Development: What Have We Learned? Processes," Working Papers 200604, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
    15. Arslan, Cansın & Wollni, Meike & Oduol, Judith & Hughes, Karl, 2022. "Who communicates the information matters for technology adoption," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Timothy G. Conley & Christopher R. Udry, 2005. "Learning about a new technology: pineapple in Ghana," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    17. Kondylis, Florence & Mueller, Valerie, 2012. "Seeing is Believing? Evidence from a Demonstration Plot Experiment in Mozambique," Mozambique Working Paper 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    18. Deschamps-Laporte, Jean-Philippe, 2013. "The impact of extension services on farming households in Western Kenya: A propensity score approach," Working Papers 2013:5, Örebro University, School of Business, revised 10 Jun 2013.
    19. Francisca Henriquez, 2009. "Microcrédito y su Impacto: Un Acercamiento con Datos Chilenos," OVE Working Papers 0309, Inter-American Development Bank, Office of Evaluation and Oversight (OVE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ovdeia:295968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.