IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr10/207254.html

Operating characteristics of passenger screening processes and the development of a paced inspection system

Author

Listed:
  • Leone, Kelly
  • Das, Sanchoy

Abstract

The airport checkpoint security screening system is an important line of defense against the introduction of dangerous objects into the U.S. air transport system. Recently, there has been much interest in modeling these systems and to derive operating parameters which optimize performance. In general there are two performance measures of interest (i) the waiting time of the arriving entities, and (ii) the allocated screening resources and its utilization. Clearly, the traveling public would like a zero waiting time, while airports are limited both in terms of space and resource capital. The arrival and exit entity in the system are passengers. On arrival, passengers split into two sub-entities (i) bags or other carry-on items and (ii) passenger body and the two must rejoin prior to exit. There is a 1:M ratio between passengers and carry-on items with M≥0. The existing knowledge base related to the operating characteristics of ACSS processes is very limited. Almost all screening systems have a human interpretive component, as a result the screening behavior is highly variant and difficult to predict. This research studies the operating characteristics of the security screening process to develop proven relationships between inspection times and clearance rates. A descriptive model of the screening system, which identifies the design variables, operational parameters and performance measures, is defined. Screening data was collected from 18 U.S. airports (10 high volume, 5 medium volume, and 3 low volume). The data sets captured (i) passenger arrival times, (ii) X-ray inspection times, (iii) clearance decision, (iv) passenger physical inspection times, and (v) secondary carry-on item inspection times. An empirical analysis was used to generate a speed of inspection operating characteristic (SIOC) curve for each of the inspection processes. Mean inspection times are found to be much larger than what is frequently assumed in the literature. The findings showed that the inspection rate increases linearly with inspection time until the 7 second point, after which it describes a negative growth. The behavior of these relationships under different operating conditions was studied using a set of hypothesis. These include performance differences between airport types, between checkpoints within an airport, as well as the effect of increased passenger arrival rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Leone, Kelly & Das, Sanchoy, 2010. "Operating characteristics of passenger screening processes and the development of a paced inspection system," 51st Annual Transportation Research Forum, Arlington, Virginia, March 11-13, 2010 207254, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr10:207254
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207254/files/2010_82_Operating_Passenger_Screening_Paced_Inspection_Development.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leone, Kelly & (Rachel) Liu, Rongfang, 2005. "The key design parameters of checked baggage security screening systems in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 69-78.
    2. Ronald R. Gilliam, 1979. "An Application of Queueing Theory to Airport Passenger Security Screening," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 117-123, August.
    3. P. Daniel Wright & Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 2006. "A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 514-529, December.
    4. Olapiriyakul, Sun & Das, Sanchoy, 2007. "Design and analysis of a two-stage security screening and inspection system," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 67-74.
    5. Yoo, Kwang Eui & Choi, Youn Chul, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process approach for identifying relative importance of factors to improve passenger security checks at airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 135-142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zachary A. Marshall & John H. Mott & Adam J. Gottwald & Caleb A. Patrick & Luigi Raphael I. Dy, 2022. "Expediting airport security queues through advanced lane assignment," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 245-262, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olapiriyakul, Sun & Das, Sanchoy, 2007. "Design and analysis of a two-stage security screening and inspection system," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 67-74.
    2. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2018. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of an airport passenger and baggage security screening system," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 53-64.
    3. McLay, Laura A. & Boone, Edward L. & Brooks, J. Paul, 2012. "Analyzing the volume and nature of emergency medical calls during severe weather events using regression methodologies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 55-66.
    4. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2017. "A fuzzy model for evaluating metal detection equipment at airport security screening checkpoints," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 39-48.
    5. Zhonghua Wei & Sinan Chu & Zhengde Huang & Shi Qiu & Qixuan Zhao, 2020. "Optimization Design of X-ray Conveyer Belt Length for Subway Security Check Systems in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Sukanya Samanta & Goutam Sen & Soumya Kanti Ghosh, 2022. "A literature review on police patrolling problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 1063-1106, September.
    7. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2020. "Multi-criteria group decision-making approach to the modernization of hold baggage security screening system at an airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Nagarajan, Magesh & Shaw, Duncan & Albores, Pavel, 2012. "Disseminating a warning message to evacuate: A simulation study of the behaviour of neighbours," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 810-819.
    9. David Anderson, 2021. "Optimising multi-layered security screening," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 249-273, December.
    10. Jacobson, Sheldon H. & Kobza, John E. & Nakayama, Marvin K., 2000. "A sampling procedure to estimate risk probabilities in access-control security systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 123-132, April.
    11. Adedotun Joseph Adenigbo, 2024. "Assessment of airport security culture in Nigeria," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. P. Daniel Wright & Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 2006. "A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 514-529, December.
    13. Stuart Weele & Jose Ramirez-Marquez, 2011. "Optimization of container inspection strategy via a genetic algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 187(1), pages 229-247, July.
    14. Dean, Matthew D. & Nair, Suresh K., 2014. "Mass-casualty triage: Distribution of victims to multiple hospitals using the SAVE model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 363-373.
    15. Justin Yates & Sujeevraja Sanjeevi, 2012. "Assessing the impact of vulnerability modeling in the protection of critical infrastructure," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 415-435, October.
    16. Chiti, Francesco & Fantacci, Romano & Rizzo, Andrea, 2018. "An integrated software platform for airport queues prediction with application to resources management," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 11-18.
    17. Huang, Kai & Jiang, Yiping & Yuan, Yufei & Zhao, Lindu, 2015. "Modeling multiple humanitarian objectives in emergency response to large-scale disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-17.
    18. Salter, Mark B., 2007. "SeMS and sensibility: Security management systems and the management of risk in the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 389-398.
    19. N C Simpson & P G Hancock, 2009. "Fifty years of operational research and emergency response," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 126-139, May.
    20. Youzhi Zeng & Yongkang Qiang & Ning Zhang & Xiaobao Yang & Zhenjun Zhao & Xiaoqiao Wang, 2024. "An Influencing Factors Analysis of Road Traffic Accidents Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Minimum Discrimination Information Principle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr10:207254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.